Chapter 5. Research on Health Care for Priority Populations

As part of the Agency's overall research portfolio, AHRQ supports and conducts research and evaluations of health care delivery for priority populations. These include individuals who live in inner city and rural areas (including frontier areas), low-income groups, minorities, women, children, elderly individuals, and people with special health care needs, including those with disabilities and those who need chronic or end-of-life care. Further, the Agency supports the generation and dissemination of health services research to promote equitable access to health care services for all Americans and the elimination of health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. This section of the report is focused on AHRQ's activities with regard to three of these priority populations: minorities, women, and children.

Health Care for Minorities, Women, and Children

AHRQ's research emphasizes the needs of priority populations, who generally are underserved by the health care system and underrepresented in research. Disparities in health care for minorities, women, and children have been well-documented in recent years. These disparities span a broad range of medical conditions and health care delivery issues. For example:

Return to Contents

Minority Health

Although the overall health of Americans has improved dramatically over the last century, racial and ethnic minorities have in the past experienced poor health and challenges in accessing high quality care. Findings from the 2000 Census indicate continued diversification of the U.S. population and growth in some groups considered to be at high risk for missing the benefits of health care.

This will become even more problematic, since some racial and ethnic minority populations are growing at a much more rapid pace than the majority white population. By the year 2050, it is estimated that nearly one in two Americans will be a member of a racial or ethnic minority group—that is, black, Hispanic, Asian, or American Indian.

Despite the high quality of care available, research has suggested that a gap exists between ideal health care and the actual care that Americans sometimes receive. For example:

AHRQ Focus on Minority Health

Closing the gap for minority populations is a major priority for the Department of Health and Human Services and for AHRQ. Indeed, AHRQ has been funding and conducting research on topics relevant to minority health for many decades.

In FY 2003 alone, AHRQ funded about $42 million in research with a major emphasis on minority health. This commitment includes continued funding of the Excellence Centers to Eliminate Ethnic/Racial Disparities (EXCEED) grants, a major research effort to improve our understanding of the factors that contribute to ethnic and racial inequities in health care, and the Minority Research Infrastructure Support Program (M-RISP), which was established to increase the capacity of institutions that serve racial and ethnic minorities to conduct rigorous health services research.

Current and Recently Completed Research on Minority Health

Examples of other current and recently completed research projects focused on minority health include:

Recent Research Findings Related to Minority Health

Examples of recent findings from AHRQ-supported research on minority health include:

Return to Contents

Women's Health

The life expectancy of U.S. women has nearly doubled in the past 100 years, from 48 years in 1900 to nearly 80 years in 2000, compared with an average of 74 years for men in 2000. Although women have a longer life expectancy than men, they do not necessarily live those extra years in good physical and mental health. On average, women experience 3.1 years of disability at the end of life.

AHRQ supports research on all aspects of health care provided to women, including quality, access, outcomes, and cost. AHRQ is particularly interested in studies that examine ways to enhance active life expectancy for older women.

AHRQ's women's health research agenda supports studies that are designed to:

Examples of current AHRQ-supported research on women's health include:

In addition to these projects, other studies underway focus on:

Recent Findings From AHRQ Research on Women's Health

  • Insurance status does not explain male/female differences in heart attack treatments and outcomes. This study involved more than 327,000 men and women who suffered heart attacks between 1994 and 1997. Women received fewer cardiac treatments and procedures and had worse outcomes than men, but insurance status was not the reason.
  • Lumpectomy followed by radiation and mastectomy are equally effective for treating early-stage breast cancer. Two studies from Georgetown University examined the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatments for early-stage breast cancer and patients' quality of life after surgery. They found that giving older women with early-stage breast cancer a choice between breast-conserving surgery and radiation and mastectomy is cost effective. They also found that how older women are treated during their care, not the therapy itself, is the most important determinant of long-term quality of life.
  • Telecolposcopy can enhance diagnostic accuracy for women with abnormal Pap smears or other indications for colposcopy who are examined at rural clinics. The study was carried out by researchers at the Medical College of Georgia.
  • Researchers at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, interviewed 1,300 women to assess urinary incontinence before and after hysterectomy and found that UI improves for the first 2 years after surgery for most women who have moderate or severe incontinence.

Return to Contents

Children's Health

Childhood is a unique developmental stage of life, childhood health may affect adult health, and the child health care system is distinctive. For these and other reasons, children's health has been a research and policy priority in the United States for many years.

The following four distinguishing characteristics have important implications for policymakers, clinicians, and others who are involved in health care for children:

A unique set of health care financing and organizational arrangements has evolved for U.S. children. Poor children have been a mandatory population for the Medicaid program from the beginning, and adolescents were added gradually over time to the program. In 1997, the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was created to provide coverage to certain uninsured low-income children who are not eligible for Medicaid. Other health care financing mechanisms for children include the Maternal and Child Health Block Grants and Social Security, which provides cash benefits to eligible families to help pay for health care for some disabled children.

AHRQ's Child Health Research Agenda

A special research focus is necessary to improve the delivery of health care services to children and adolescents. AHRQ's child health research agenda is focused on finding ways to improve outcomes, quality, and access to health care for America's 70 million children and adolescents. The goal is to improve the quality and safety of care provided to children, enhance their access to care, and improve the delivery of care to children with special needs, those living in rural and underserved areas, and children from poor or near poor families.

AHRQ's work helps to fill the major gap that exists in evidence-based information on the health care needs of children and adolescents. In FY 2003, AHRQ committed nearly $10 million in total support for new child health services research projects and training grants, contracts, and interagency agreements relating directly to health care issues affecting children and adolescents.

Examples of Ongoing Research and Recent Findings

Examples of current AHRQ-supported research on health care for children and adolescents include:

Child Health Insurance Research Initiative (CHIRI™) Studies

In 1999, AHRQ—in partnership with the Health Resources and Services Administration and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation—funded nine 3-year projects for more than $9 million to examine ways to improve health care for low-income children receiving care through publicly funded programs, including SCHIP. The projects were dispersed around the country and focused on identifying which features work best for low-income, minority, and special-needs children. Five of the projects have been completed; the following four projects are still in progress:

  • Evaluation of Kansas Healthwave, Kansas Health Institute.
  • Medicaid versus Premium Subsidy: Oregon's CHIP Alternatives, Center for Health Economics Research, Waltham, MA.
  • New York's SCHIP: What Works for Vulnerable Children, University of Rochester.
  • Provider Participation and Access in Alabama and Georgia, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Examples of findings from recently completed AHRQ-funded studies on health care for children and adolescents include:

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section