Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

Funding		FY 2008 Appropriated	FY 2009 Omnibus	FY 2009 Recovery Act	FY 2010 President's Budget Request	FY 2010 +/- FY 2009 Omnibus
Total	Budget Authority (BA)	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	Public Health Service (PHS) Evaluation Funds	$55,300,000	$55,300,000	$0	$55,300,000	$0
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)		NA	NA	NA	NA	NA

FY 2009 Authorization: Title III and IX and Section 937(c) of the Public Health Service Act.
Allocation Method: Contracts, and Other.

A. Program Description and Accomplishments

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), first funded in 1995, is the only national source for annual data on how Americans use and pay for medical care. It supports all of AHRQ's research related strategic goal areas. The survey collects detailed information from families on access, use, expense, insurance coverage and quality. Data are disseminated to the public through printed and Web-based tabulations, microdata files and research reports/journal articles.

The data from the MEPS have become a linchpin for the public and private economic models projecting health care expenditures and utilization. This level of detail enables public and private sector economic models to develop national and regional estimates of the impact of changes in financing, coverage, and reimbursement policy, as well as estimates of who benefits and who bears the cost of a change in policy. No other surveys provide the foundation for estimating the impact of changes on different economic groups or special populations of interest, such as the poor, elderly, veterans, the uninsured, or racial/ethnic groups. Government and nongovernmental entities rely upon these data to evaluate health reform policies, the effect of tax code changes on health expenditures and tax revenue, and proposed changes in government health programs such as Medicare. In the private sector (e.g., RAND, Heritage Foundation, Lewin-VHI, and the Urban Institute), these data are used by many private businesses, foundations, and academic institutions to develop economic projections. These data represent a major resource for the health services research community at large. Since 2000, data on premium costs from the MEPS Insurance Component have been used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis to produce estimates of the gross domestic product (GDP) for the Nation.

Because of the need for timely data, performance goals for MEPS have focused on providing data in a timely manner. The MEPS program has met or exceeded all of its data timeliness goals. These performance goals require the release of the MEPS Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) tables within 7 months of data collection; the release of MEPS Use and Demographic Files within 12 months of data collection; the release of MEPS Full Year Expenditure data within 12 months of data collection. In addition, the program has expanded the depth and breadth of data products available to serve a wide range of users. To date, over 200 statistical briefs have been published. The MEPS data table series has expanded to include eight topic areas on the household component and nine topic areas on the Insurance Component. In addition, specific large State and metro area expenditure and coverage estimates have been produced, further increasing the utility of MEPS within the existing program costs. In 2008, further advances in the timeliness of the MEPS Insurance Component data have been initiated through a change in the questionnaire to obtain employer sponsored coverage information that is in force at the time of data collection, rather than for a prior year retrospective reference period. Further advances in data accessibility have also been achieved by expanding the number of Data Centers across the Nation to permit access to MEPS restricted data through a collaboration with the Bureau of the Census to utilize nine additional Research Data Centers for approved projects. Since its inception in 1996, MEPS has been used in several hundred scientific publications, and many more unpublished reports to inform health policy decisions and practice.

• The MEPS data have been used extensively by the Congressional Budget Office, Congressional Research Service, Department of Treasury, Joint Taxation Committee, and Department of Labor to inform Congressional inquires related to health care expenditures, insurance coverage and sources of payment and to analyze potential tax and other implications of Federal Health Insurance Policies.
• MEPS data on health care quality, access, and health insurance coverage have been used extensively in the Department's two annual reports to Congress, the National Healthcare Disparities Report and the National Healthcare Quality Report.
• The MEPS was awarded the American Association for Public Opinion Research's 2008 Policy Impact Award in recognition of their extraordinary, long-term group effort in contributing timely data and research that has informed U.S. health care policy decisions.
• The MEPS has been used in Congressional testimony on the impact of health insurance coverage rate increases on small businesses.
• The MEPS data have informed studies of the value of health insurance in private markets and the effect of consumer payment on health care.
• The MEPS data have been extensively used to inform Congressional inquiries tied to State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) reauthorization, with particular emphasis on the change in take-up rates among Medicaid eligible children over the implementation period of SCHIP and the percent of all uninsured children who are eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP.
• The MEPS-IC has been used by a number of States in evaluating their own private insurance issues including eligibility and enrollment by the State of Connecticut and by the Maryland Health Care Commission; and community rating by the State of New York. As part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's State Coverage Initiative, MEPS data was cited in 69 reports, representing 27 States.
• The MEPS data have been used extensively by the Government Accountability Office to determine trends in Employee Compensation, with a major focus on the percentage of employees at establishments that offer health insurance, the percentage of eligible employees who enroll in the health insurance plans, the average annual premium for employer-provided health insurance for single workers, and the employees' share of these premiums.
• MEPS data have been used in HHS Reports to Congress on expenditures by sources of payment for individuals afflicted by conditions that include acute respiratory distress syndrome, arthritis, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, and heart disease.
• MEPS data are used to develop estimates provided in the Consumers Checkbook Guide to Health Plans, of expected out of pocket costs (premiums, deductibles and copayments) for Federal employees and retirees for their health care. The Checkbook is an annual publication that provides comparative information on the health insurance choices offered to Federal workers and retirees.
• The MEPS has been used to estimate the impact of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (the effect of the MMA on availability of retiree coverage), by the Iowa Rural Policy Institute (effect of the MMA on rural elderly) and by researchers to examine levels of spending and co-payments.
• MEPS data have been used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and others to evaluate the cost of common conditions including arthritis, injuries, diabetes, obesity, and cancer.

Before AHRQ reorganized research portfolios, MEPS was part of the Data Collection and Dissemination portfolio. This portfolio underwent a program assessment in 2002, and was found to be moderately effective. The review cited MEPS as a strong attribute of the program. As a result of the program assessment, the program continues to take actions to reduce the number of months that MEPS data is made available after the date of completion of the survey, increase the number of MEPS data users, and increase the number of topical areas tables included in the MEPS Tables Compendia.

B. Funding History

Funding for the MEPS budget activity during the last five years has been as follows:

Year	Dollars
2005	$55,300,000
2006	$55,300,000
2007	$55,300,000
2008	$55,300,000
2009	$55,300,000

C. Budget Request

The FY 2010 President's Budget Request for the MEPS totals $55,300,000 in PHS evaluation funds, maintaining the FY 2009 Omnibus level. The funding allocation in FY 2010 for the three core MEPS Component Surveys follows: MEPS Household Component ($33,300,000); MEPS Medical Provider Component ($12,000,000); and the MEPS Insurance Component ($10,000,000).

The FY 2010 funding for MEPS will be used to support the sample size and content of the MEPS Household and Medical Provider Surveys necessary to satisfy the congressional mandate to submit an annual report on national trends in health care quality and to prepare an annual report on health care disparities. The MEPS Household Component sample size is specified at 14,000 households in 2010 with full calendar year information. These sample size specifications for the MEPS permit detailed analyses of the quality of care received by special populations meeting precision specifications for survey estimates. This design, in concert with the survey enhancements initiated in prior years, significantly enhances AHRQ's capacity to report on the quality of care Americans receive at the national and regional level, in terms of clinical quality, patient satisfaction, access, and health status both in managed care and fee-forservice settings.

The MEPS Household Component: These funds will also permit the continuation of an oversample in MEPS of Asian and Pacific Islanders and an over-sample of African Americans. These enhancements, in concert with the existing MEPS capacity to examine differences in the cost, quality and access to care for minorities, ethnic groups and low income individuals, will provide critical data for the National Healthcare Quality Report and the National Healthcare Disparities Report.

The MEPS Insurance Component: These funds will also permit the continuation of an oversample in MEPS of Asian and Pacific Islanders and an over-sample of African Americans. These enhancements, in concert with the existing MEPS capacity to examine differences in the cost, quality and access to care for minorities, ethnic groups and low income individuals, will provide critical data for the National Healthcare Quality Report and the National Healthcare Disparities Report.

The Medical Provider Component: FY 2010 funds will also support the MEPS Medical Provider Component, a survey of medical providers, facilities and pharmacies that collects detailed data on the expenditures and sources of payment for the medical services provided to individuals sampled for the MEPS. Such data are essential to improve the accuracy of the national medical expenditure estimates derived from the MEPS and to correct for the item non-response on expenditures by household sample participants.

Recent enhancements to the estimation capabilities of the MEPS Household Component have also been realized and permit the generation of health care utilization, expenditure, and health insurance coverage estimates for some large metropolitan areas and for the ten largest States. This has resulted in visible improvements in the analytic capacity of the survey without any additional increments to the sample size.

MEPS—Marginal Cost

The Baseline MEPS sample consists of approximately 14,000 households and 32,000 individuals, and includes over-sampling of African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and low income households. With respect to desired levels of precision for survey estimates, a relative standard error (RSE) specification of less than or equal to 10 percent is recommended for survey estimates that characterize policy relevant population subgroups, which include racial and ethnic minorities (RSE (X) = standard error (X) divided by the estimate X). This precision target is not currently being met for estimates of the health care utilization and expenditure patterns for American Indians/Alaskan Natives, subgroups of individuals of multiple races (e.g. race classifications of both African American and other race), specific Hispanic subgroups (e.g., Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican) and Asian population subgroups (e.g., Chinese, Vietnamese, Asian Indian). The FY 2010 cost estimate for MEPS—at an average cost of $6,971 per household for the household and medical provider components of the MEPS survey—would allow for the following sample yields for these racial and ethnic minority population subgroups in MEPS.

MEPS Over-sampling

Subgroup		Baseline—FY 2010 President’s Budget Request
		Individuals	Relative Standard Error (for mean expenditures)
Asians		1,300	7.8%
Chinese		160	16%
Hispanic Subgroups	Puerto Ricans	700	11.5%
	Cuban	300	33.2%
	Dominican	225	19.0%%
American Indian/Alaskan Native		400	13.2%
Multiple Race		575	9.0%

The baseline cost components related to the household and medical provider component of MEPS for a full panel of 7,000 households over 3 years are provided below:

Cost Components	Baseline
Households	Full MEPS consists of 14,000 households
(1) Sample Selection	$0.6 M
(2) Management	$1.1 M
(3) Hire/Train Household/Medical Provider Survey Staff	$3.4 M
(4.a) Conduct Household Interviews	$20.7 M
(4.b) Data Collection—Medical Providers	$10.9 M
(5) Data Processing/Production of Analytical Files	$12.1 M
Total Cost	$48.8 M
Cost per Household	$6,971

Costs associated with (1) the sample frame preparation and sample selections for the MEPS Household and Medical Provider Surveys and (2) the management tasks are fixed, while costs associated with the remaining data collection and data processing components are variable.

In 2007, a marginal cost analysis was completed to determine the marginal cost of increasing the degree of oversampling in the MEPS sample among certain minority sub-groups. This oversampling would allow estimates for these subgroups to be more precise, allowing the implications of program and policies to be more accurately estimated for these groups using MEPS data. As indicated, many estimates for these subgroups have relative standard errors that are higher than the recommended maximum threshold of 10 percent. The marginal cost to reach the recommended RSE of 10 percent for these minority subgroups in 2010 and 2011 is $4,300 per additional minority household surveyed, which is lower than the current average cost per household of $6,971.

The table below indicates the percent reduction in relative standard errors in survey estimates that could be achieved by a targeted MEPS sample augmentation of 1,000 additional households.

Subgroup		RSE (for mean expenditures) with MEPS Sample Augmentation	Reduction in RSE (for mean expenditures) with MEPS Sample Augmentation
Asians		5.9%	24%
Chinese		12.0%	24%
Hispanic Subgroups	Puerto Ricans	9.6%	15%
	Cuban	25.7%	23%
	Dominican	24%	13.8%
American Indian/Alaskan Native		10.0%	24%
Multiple Race		7.6%	16%

D. Outputs and Outcomes Tables

Program: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

Long-Term Objective: Achieve a wider access to effective health care services and reduce health care costs.

Measure	FY	Target	Result
1.3.16: Insurance Component tables will be available within months of collection (Output)	2010	TBD	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	Set Baseline	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	6	6 (Target Met)
	2007	6	6 (Target Met)
	2006	N/A	6 (Historical Actual)
	2005	N/A	7 (Historical Actual)
1.3.17: MEPS Use and Demographic Files will be available months after final data collection (Output)	2010	11	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	11	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	11	11 (Target Met)
	2007	11	11 (Target Met)
	2006	N/A	11
	2005	N/A	12 (Historical Actual)
1.3.18: Number of months after the date of completion of the MEPS data will be available (Output)	2010	10.8	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	11	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	11	11 (Target Met)
	2007	11	11 (Target Met)
	2006	12 months	12 months (Target Met)
	2005	12 months	12 months (Target Met)
1.3.19: Increase the number of topical areas tables included in the MEPS Tables Compendia (TC) (Output)	2010	Add additional variables to MEPS Net	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	Update State level tables	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	Add Prescribed Drug Tables	Prescribed Drug Tables Added (Target Met)
	2007	Add Insurance Tables	Insurance Tables Added (Target Met)
	2006	Add State Tables	State Tables Added (Target Met)
	2005	Add Access Tables	Access Tables added (Target Met)
1.3.20: Increase the number of MEPS data users Baseline FY 2005: 10 Data Center Projects (DCP), 15,900 TC, 13,101 Household Component/Insurance Component (HC/IC) (Outcome)	2010	Exceed baseline standard	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	Exceed baseline standard	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	Exceed baseline standard	41 DCP (Target Met)
	2007	Exceed baseline standard	23 DCP 19,989 TCP 14,809 HC/IC (Target Met)
	2006	Exceed Baseline standard	14 DCP 16,200 TCP 11,600 HC/IC (Target Met)
	2005	Maintain Baseline standard	10 Data Center Projects (DCP) 15,900 Tables Compendia (TC) 13,101 Household Component/Insurance Component (HC/IC)
1.3.21: The number of months required to produce MEPS data files (i.e., point-in-time, utilization, and expenditure files) for public dissemination following data collection (Outcome)	2010	10.8 months	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	11 months	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	11 months	11 months (Target Met)
	2007	11 months	11 months (Target Met)
	2006	12 months	12 months (Target Met)
	2005	N/A	N/A
1.3.49: The average number of field staff hours required to collect data per respondent household for the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (at level funding) (Annual Efficiency Measure)	2010	12.8 hours	Oct. 31, 2010
	2009	13.0 hours	Oct. 31, 2009
	2008	13.5 hours	13.5 hours
	2007	Baseline	14.2 hours
	2006	N/A	N/A
	2005	N/A	N/A

 

Measure	Data Source	Data Validation
1.3.16	MEPS Web site	Data published on Web site
1.3.17 1.3.18 1.3.21	MEPS Web site	Monthly meetings with contractor, careful monitoring of field progress and instrument design, quality control procedures including benchmarking with other national data sources.
1.3.19	MEPS Web site	Data published on Web site
1.3.20	MEPS data: List of ongoing projects	Publications
1.3.49		The number of field staff hours required to collect data per respondent household for the MEPS is logged by field staff in an automated system. Data quality and validation is monitored in several ways: (1) Validation interviews are conducted for a sample of respondents, in which questions concerning the interview process are asked; (2) Response rates are monitored to ensure that they stay high; and (3) the duration of interviews are tracked to ensure that interviewers are following proper protocol and not skipping questions during the interview.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section