Online Performance Appendix: Performance Detail, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

Budget Estimates for Appropriations Committees, Fiscal Year 2011

This appendix provides more detailed performance information for all HHS measures related to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's budget.

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), first funded in 1995, is the only national source for annual data on how Americans use and pay for medical care. It supports all of AHRQ's research related strategic goal areas. The survey collects detailed information from families on access, use, expense, insurance coverage and quality. Data are disseminated to the public through printed and Web-based tabulations, microdata files and research reports/journal articles.

The MEPS is designed to provide annual estimates at the national level of the health care utilization, expenditures, sources of payment and health insurance coverage for the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population. The MEPS consists of a family of interrelated surveys, which include a Household Component (HC), a Medical Provider Component (MPC), and an Insurance Component. In addition to collecting data to yield annual estimates for a variety of measures related to health care use and expenditures, MEPS provides estimates of measures related to health status, demographic characteristics, employment, access to health care and health care quality. Estimates can be provided for individuals, families and population subgroups of interest. The data collected in this ongoing longitudinal study also permit studies of the determinants of the use of services and expenditures, and changes in the provision of health care in relation to social and demographic factors such as employment or income; the health status and satisfaction with health care of individuals and families; and the health needs of specific population groups such as the elderly and children.

The data from the MEPS have become a linchpin for the public and private economic models projecting health care expenditures and utilization. This level of detail enables public and private sector economic models to develop national and regional estimates of the impact of changes in financing, coverage, and reimbursement policy, as well as estimates of who benefits and who bears the cost of a change in policy. No other surveys provide the foundation for estimating the impact of changes on different economic groups or special populations of interest, such as the poor, elderly, veterans, the uninsured, or racial/ethnic groups. Government and non-governmental entities rely upon these data to evaluate health policies, the effect of tax code changes on health expenditures and tax revenue, and proposed changes in government health programs such as Medicare. In the private sector (e.g., RAND, Heritage Foundation, Lewin-VHI, and the Urban Institute), these data are used by many private businesses, foundations, and academic institutions to develop economic projections. These data represent a major resource for the health services research community at large. Since 2000, data on premium costs from the MEPS Insurance Component have been used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis to produce estimates of the GDP for the Nation.

Because of the need for timely data, performance goals for MEPS have focused on providing data in a timely manner. The MEPS program has met or exceeded all of its data timeliness goals. These performance goals require the release of the MEPS Insurance Component tables within 6 months of data collection; the release of MEPS Use and Demographic Files within 11 months of data collection; the release of MEPS Full Year Expenditure data within 11 months of data collection. In addition, the program has expanded the depth and breadth of data products available to serve a wide range of users. To date, over 275 statistical briefs have been published. The MEPS data table series has expanded to include eight topic areas on the household component and nine topic areas on the Insurance Component. In addition, specific large State and metro area expenditure and coverage estimates have been produced, further increasing the utility of MEPS within the existing program costs.

Further advances in the timeliness of the MEPS Insurance Component data have been initiated through a change in the questionnaire to obtain employer sponsored coverage information that is in force at the time of data collection, rather than for a prior year retrospective reference period. Due to such changes in the Insurance Component survey design and processing, the calendar year 2008 estimates of employer-based health insurance costs and availability are now provided a full year earlier than in previous years. In FY 2009, this timely advance in the provision of national and state level health insurance premium estimates served to improve the accuracy of the cost implications associated with health initiatives. In addition, advances in data accessibility have also been achieved by expanding the number of Data Centers across the Nation to permit access to MEPS restricted data through collaboration with the Bureau of the Census to utilize nine additional Research Data Centers for approved projects. Since its inception in 1996, MEPS has been used in several hundred scientific publications, and many more unpublished reports to inform health policy decisions and practice.

  • MEPS data on national and state estimates of the percentage of employees enrolled in high cost health insurance plans were used by the Senate Finance Committee to develop their legislation.
  • MEPS data produced detailed estimates of children eligible for S-CHIP who were uninsured. The information provided on number of children who were eligible for such coverage but remained uninsured had a significant impact on the Reauthorization of the Child Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
  • MEPS data on national estimates of gaps and trends in health insurance coverage over two year period was used by Secretary Sebelius in a speech on Insurance Insecurity and the related HHS Report.
  • The MEPS data have been used extensively by the Congressional Budget Office, Congressional Research Service, Department of Treasury, Joint Taxation Committee, and Department of Labor to inform Congressional inquires related to health care expenditures, insurance coverage and sources of payment and to analyze potential tax and other implications of Federal Health Insurance Policies.
  • MEPS data on health care quality, access, and health insurance coverage have been used extensively in the Department's two annual reports to Congress, the National Healthcare Disparities Report and the National Healthcare Quality Report.
  • The MEPS was awarded the American Association for Public Opinion Research's 2008 Policy Impact Award in recognition of their extraordinary, long-term group effort in contributing timely data and research that has informed U.S. health care policy decisions.
  • The MEPS has been used in Congressional testimony on the impact of health insurance coverage rate increases on small businesses.
  • The MEPS data have informed studies of the value of health insurance in private markets and the effect of consumer payment on health care.
  • The MEPS data have been extensively used to inform Congressional inquiries tied to State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) reauthorization, with particular emphasis on the change in take-up rates among Medicaid eligible children over the implementation period of SCHIP and the percent of all uninsured children who are eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP.
  • The MEPS -IC has been used by a number of States in evaluating their own private insurance issues including eligibility and enrollment by the State of Connecticut and by the Maryland Health Care Commission; and community rating by the State of New York. As part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's State Coverage Initiative, MEPS data was cited in 69 reports, representing 27 States.
  • The MEPS data have been used extensively by the Government Accountability Office to determine trends in Employee Compensation, with a major focus on the percentage of employees at establishments that offer health insurance, the percentage of eligible employees who enroll in the health insurance plans, the average annual premium for employer-provided health insurance for single workers, and the employees' share of these premiums.
  • MEPS data have been used in HHS Reports to Congress on expenditures by sources of payment for individuals afflicted by conditions that include acute respiratory distress syndrome, arthritis, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, and heart disease.
  • MEPS data are used to develop estimates provided in the Consumers Checkbook Guide to Health Plans, of expected out of pocket costs (premiums, deductibles and copayments) for Federal employees and retirees for their health care. The Checkbook is an annual publication that provides comparative information on the health insurance choices offered to Federal workers and retirees.
  • The MEPS has been used to estimate the impact of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (the effect of the MMA on availability of retiree coverage), by the Iowa Rural Policy Institute (effect of the MMA on rural elderly) and by researchers to examine levels of spending and co-payments.
  • MEPS data have been used by CDC and others to evaluate the cost of common conditions including arthritis, injuries, diabetes, obesity and cancer.

Before AHRQ reorganized research portfolios in 2007, MEPS was part of the Data Collection and Dissemination portfolio. This portfolio underwent a program assessment in 2002, and was found to be moderately effective. The review cited the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) as a strong attribute of the program. As a result of the program assessment, the program continues to take actions to reduce the number of months that MEPS data is made available after the date of completion of the survey, increase the number of MEPS data users, and increase the number of topical areas tables included in the MEPS Tables Compendia.

Performance Targets

In terms of performance targets, measures 1.3.16 in FY 2011, and measure 1.3.17 in FY 2010 cannot be more ambitious than the prior year. The MEPS program recently re-engineered its interviewing system. At the same time, our sample design changed as a result of the new sample design of the National Health Interview Survey. Because of these changes, additional quality control measures are needed to insure the integrity of survey estimates. Once this process is stable, we will evaluate whether continued efficiencies are possible, and what resources would be required to attain them.

Performance Trends: The MEPS Program has met or exceeded all program assessment data timeliness goals. In addition, due to modifications to the MEPS Insurance Component survey design and data processing, calendar year estimates of employer-based health insurance costs and availability were provided a full year earlier than in previous years.

Long-Term Objective: Achieve a wider access to effective health care services and reduce health care costs.

MeasureFYTargetResult
1.3.16: Insurance Component tables will be available within months of collection.
(Output)
20116Oct 31, 2011
20106Oct 31, 2010
2009Set Baseline6
(Target Met)
200866
(Target Met)
200766
(Target Met)
2006N/A6
(Historical Actual)
1.3.17: MEPS Use and Demographic Files will be available months after final data collection.
(Output)
201110.5Oct 31, 2011
201011Oct 31, 2010
20091111
(Target Met)
20081111
(Target Met)
20071111
(Target Met)
2006N/A11
1.3.18: Number of months after the date of completion of the MEPS data will be available.
(Output)
201110.5 monthsOct 31, 2011
201010.8 monthsOct 31, 2010
200911 months11 months
(Target Met)
200811 months11 months
(Target Met)
200711 months11 months
(Target Met)
200612 months12 months
(Target Met)
   
1.3.19: Increase the number of topical areas tables included in the MEPS Tables Compendia (TC).
(Output)
2011Add additional variables to MEPS netOct 31, 2011
2010Add additional variables to MEPS netOct 31, 2010
2009Update State-level tablesUpdated State Level Estimates (Target Met)
2008Add Prescribed Drug TablesPrescribed Drug Tables Added
(Target Met)
2007Add Insurance TablesInsurance Tables Added
(Target Met)
2006Add State TablesState Tables Added
(Target Met)
1.3.20: Increase the number of MEPS data users .

Baseline FY 2005: 10 Data Center Projects (DCP), 15,900 TC, 13,101 Household Component/Insurance Component (HC/IC). (Outcome)
2011Exceed baseline standardOct 31, 2011
2010Exceed baseline standardOct 31, 2010
2009Exceed baseline standard41 DCP
(Target Met)
2008Exceed baseline standard41 DCP
(Target Met)
2007Exceed baseline standard23 DCP 

19,989 TCP 

14,809 HC/IC
(Target Met)
2006Exceed Baseline standard14 DCP

16,200 TCP

11,600 HC/IC
(Target Met)
1.3.21: The number of months required to produce MEPS data files (i.e., point-in-time, utilization, and expenditure files) for public dissemination following data collection. (Outcome)201110.6 monthsOct 31, 2011
201010.8 monthsOct 31, 2010
200911 months11 months
(Target Met)
200811 months11 months
(Target Met)
200711 months11 months
(Target Met)
200612 months12 months
(Target Met)
1.3.49:  The average number of field staff hours required to collect data per respondent household for the MEPS (at level funding).
(Annual Efficiency Measure)
201112.7 hoursOct 31, 2011
201012.8 hoursOct 31, 2010
200913.0 hours13.0 hours
(Target Met)
200813.5 hours13.5 hours
2007Baseline14.2 hours
2006N/AN/A

MeasureData SourceData Validation
1.3.16MEPS Web siteData published on Web site
1.3.17
1.3.18
1.3.21
MEPS Web siteMonthly meetings with contractor, careful monitoring of field progress and instrument design, quality control procedures, including benchmarking with other national data sources.
1.3.19MEPS Web siteData published on Web site.
1.3.20MEPS data: List of ongoing projectsPublications.
1.3.49 The number of field staff hours required to collect data per respondent household for the MEPS is logged by field staff in an automated system. Data quality and validation is monitored in several ways: 1) validation interviews are conducted for a sample of respondents, in which questions concerning the interview process are asked; 2) response rates are monitored to ensure that they stay high; and 3) the duration of interviews are tracked to ensure that interviewers are following proper protocol and not skipping questions during the interview.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section

Current as of February 2010
Internet Citation: Online Performance Appendix: Performance Detail, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS): Budget Estimates for Appropriations Committees, Fiscal Year 2011. February 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/about/mission/budget/2011/opa12.html