A picture of four small children in a row
Cost Sharing gifCost Sharing Title gif AHRQ User Liaison Program
  Skip Navigation | Home Cost-Sharing Implications of Past State Experiences

previous page Previous  - Next next page

top of nav bar

Target Population Link Outreach Enrollment link Benefit Design and Service Delivery link Cost Sharing Link
Crowd Out Link Monitoring and Evaluation link
Space saver image Site map link link legend link questions and comments acronyms list workshop materials link how to use this site link

Implications of Past State Experiences for Effect of Cost-Sharing on SCHIP Access and Utilization

In summary, overall lessons learned in States’cost-sharing experiences were:

  • As premiums rise, participation levels fall.
  • Even when the program is free, some families will not participate.
  • There is no universally "right" level of cost-sharing.
  • There are cost-sharing trade-offs between budget and participation goals.
  • Cost-sharing should be monitored through a variety of data collection methods, such as participant surveys and tracking of contributions made and services accessed, in order to assess the impact of cost-sharing on enrollment and utilization.

Related Questions

Give me an example

Give me an overall context

Give me details

<Who presented this material?

arrow up