A picture of four small children in a row
Crowd Out gifCrowd Out Title gif AHRQ User Liaison Program
  Skip Navigation | Home Crowd-Out Regulations Crowd-Out Prevention Strategies

previous page Previous  - References next page

top of nav bar

Target Population Link Outreach Enrollment link Benefit Design and Service Delivery link Cost Sharing Link Crowd Out Link Monitoring and Evaluation link
Space saver image Site map link link legend link questions and comments acronyms list workshop materials link how to use this site link

Strategies to Prevent Crowd-Out

What Can States Do to Prevent Crowd-Out?

  • Institute waiting periods (3, 6, or 12 months).
  • Limit eligibility to uninsured or under-insured.
  • Subsidize employer-based coverage.
  • Impose premium contributions for families above 150 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL).
  • Set premiums and coverage at levels comparable to employer-sponsored coverage.
  • Monitor crowd-out and implement prevention strategies if crowd-out becomes a problem.
Strategy* States
3-Month Waiting Period California, Colorado, Maine, Montana, Utah
6-Month Waiting Period Connecticut, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Wisconsin
12-Month Waiting Period New Jersey
Denial of Coverage if Access to Insurance Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Rhode Island, Wisconsin
Subsidize Employer Coverage Massachusetts, Maryland, New York, North Carolina
Premium Contributions (Above 150 percent FPL) Michigan, Rhode Island, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, Nevada, California, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, Maine, Colorado, Tennessee, Wisconsin

*Note:  Most States requiring waiting periods make exceptions under certain conditions.

Challenges States Face in Addressing Crowd-Out

While crowd-out prevention strategies can be effective in reducing or preventing substitution of public for private coverage, States face several challenges implementing them.  There is concern that crowd-out strategies may:

  • Create inequities in the program that reduce participation among the uninsured.
  • Be difficult to administer.
  • Be difficult to implement given constraints on funds available for crowd-out prevention in many States.

To overcome these challenges, States will need a delicate balance of policies that will allow for an adequate focus on crowd-out, given its importance from a budget perspective, while not drawing attention away from other critical challenges, such as getting uninsured children to participate in the SCHIP program and providing access to high-quality, effective medical care in order to realize improvements in child health.  Each State will need to consider the extent to which crowd-out is likely to be a problem given their program structure and population demographics and utilize that information to develop the State's crowd-out strategies.


Related Questions

Give me an overall context

Show me other SCHIP Workshop presenter-suggested strategies

Tell me some known or potential problems

Who presented this material?

arrow up