What Effects Will Cost-Sharing Have
on Enrollment, Access, and Satisfaction with SCHIP?
Background
The Federal Medicaid program has traditionally targeted
families with low or no income. Because of this, policymakers
have customarily limited the amounts of cost-sharing that
Medicaid programs can impose in order to minimize barriers
to enrollment and utilization. As government-subsidized
health insurance programs have expanded to serve the "working
poor," however, cost-sharing issues have become more
relevant and more States have begun instituting cost-sharing
policies.
Cost-sharing options such as premium contributions
have been used in family-based expansion programs like TennCare
and Washington's
Basic Health Plan
and are being permitted in Title XXI programs as well. Under
SCHIP, States choosing to implement new State-run programs
are granted additional flexibility to impose cost-sharing
requirements on participating families well beyond those traditionally
permitted under Medicaid. Because of this additional
flexibility, new concerns surrounding the level and extent
to which cost-sharing will present a barrier to families'
utilization of SCHIP services are emerging.
Cited articles from Families USA Foundation
about cost-sharing:
Related Questions
Give me more details
Who presented this material?
- Judith
Arnold, Leighton
Ku, Ph.D., M.P.H., and Rose
M. Naff addressed the issue of cost-sharing at SCHIP
seminar held in Sanibel Island, Florida, June 29-July 1,
1998. At the SCHIP seminar held later in the year
in Portland, Oregon, September 14-16, 1998, Rose Naff again
addressed this issue.
|