A picture of four small children in a row
monitoring/evaluation gifMonitoring/Evaluation Title gif AHRQ User Liaison Program
  Skip Navigation | Home Monitoring/Eval.  Federal Reporting Requirements pt. 2 of 3

previous page Previous  -  Next next page

top of nav bar

Target Population Link Outreach Enrollment link Benefit Design and Service Delivery link Cost Sharing Link Crowd Out Link Monitoring and Evaluation link
Space saver image Site map link link legend link questions and comments acronyms list workshop materials link how to use this site link

Federal Reporting Requirements: Quality Provisions

States must describe methods to:

  • Assure the quality and appropriateness of care, particularly with respect to well-baby care, well-child care, and immunizations.
  • Assure access to covered services, including emergency services.

States must evaluate the effectiveness of their plans including "the quality of health coverage provided." To do so, HCFA (now CMS) indicates that specific information on the number of children covered by age, income, and type of delivery system is essential to assessment of the program.

HCFA (now CMS) has outlined standard data elements necessary to monitor and evaluate SCHIP while taking deliberate caution not to overburden States with new requirements, given that many States are using existing Medicaid data and reporting systems.

Information States are expected to provide to HCFA (now CMS) includes, but is not limited to:

  • Baseline estimates of the number of uninsured children in their State.
  • A description of the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured, low-income children in the State.
  • An assessment of progress toward the State's identified strategic objectives, performance goals, and performance measures.

States are expected to report on a number of structural and process indicators collected through a variety of sources, such as:

  • Administrative data.
  • Enrollee mail or telephone surveys.
  • Population surveys.
  • Disenrollee surveys.
  • Surveys of employers.
  • Site visits to eligibility determination locations.

Related Questions

Take me to related sites

What led to this?

Where else is HCFA (now CMS) guidance discussed?

Who presented this material?

arrow up