Advantages

• Can be tailored to accomplish specific purposes, e.g., high copayment for ER, but none for preventive services.
• Can supplement provider payments.

Disadvantages

• May cause reductions in use of cost-effective services in addition to expensive services.
• Could reduce provider payments if copayments constitute a portion of the provider’s fee and the provider is responsible for collecting payment.

Related Questions

Compare or contrast this information

• How Cost-Sharing Experiences Under SCHIP May Be Different

Give me an example

• Background About New York State's Child Health Plus Program

• Results of the Study "The Use of Sliding Scale Premiums in Subsidized Insurance Programs"

• Details of the Florida Healthy Kids Corporation's Experience

Show me some lessons learned

• What's the Effect of Copayments and Premium Cost-Sharing on Access and Utilization in State Expansion Programs?

What led to this?

• What Are the Implications of Instituting Copayments and Premium Cost-Sharing?

What other issues are talked about in this section?

Who presented this material?

[Top of Page]