HomeCost-SharingCost-Sharing as a Barrier to Utilization

«-- Previous  -  Next --»

[Site Map] [Questions & Comments]
[Related Questions] [Acronyms List] [Workshop Materials] [How to Use This Site]

What Effects Will Cost-Sharing Have on Enrollment, Access, and Satisfaction with SCHIP?

Background

The Federal Medicaid program has traditionally targeted families with low or no income. Because of this, policymakers have customarily limited the amounts of cost-sharing that Medicaid programs can impose in order to minimize barriers to enrollment and utilization. As government-subsidized health insurance programs have expanded to serve the "working poor," however, cost-sharing issues have become more relevant and more States have begun instituting cost-sharing policies.

Cost-sharing options such as premium contributions have been used in family-based expansion programs like TennCare [http://www.state.tn.us/tenncare/] and Washington's Basic Health Plan [http://www.basichealth.hca.wa.gov/] and are being permitted in the new Title XXI programs as well. Under SCHIP, States choosing to implement new State-run programs are granted additional flexibility to impose cost-sharing requirements on participating families well beyond those traditionally permitted under Medicaid. Because of this additional flexibility, new concerns surrounding the level and extent to which cost-sharing will present a barrier to families' utilization of SCHIP services are emerging.

Cited articles from Families USA Foundation about cost-sharing:


Related Questions

Give me more details

Who presented this material?

[Top of Page]