Appendix Figure 3. Risky/Harmful Alcohol Use: Quality Re-Check Instrument
Study Authors: _______________________________________________________
Project Name: _______________________________________________________
Study Year: ___________ Journal: ________________________________________
Reviewer: ____________________________________ Date: __________________
| Criteria/Question |
Response |
1. Type of Randomization
- Was there definite allocation concealment:
(from CDAG Guidelines to Assess Study Quality) |
Mark best category:
__ Adequate measures taken, such as central randomization, computerized
systems, other strategies
__ Unclear concealment measures, either not reported by authors
or reported and not included in above
__ Inadequate concealment measures, such as alternation, sequential
assignment, dates of birth, day of week or any other such approach |
| 2. Attrition Bias
(from CDAG Guidelines to Assess Study Quality)
|
What is overall loss to followup?
Choose the category below that best describes the study:
__ The trial presents an intention-to-treat analysis and very few
losses to followup
__ There is intention-to-treat analysis AND are followup losses
equal to or less than 20% or there is replacement of missing values
__ There is no reporting of dropouts, more than 20-25% loss to followup,
or wide differences in losses to followup between groups
(Circle all that apply)
|
3. Were the patients and outcomes blinded?
(from CDAG Guidelines to Assess Study Quality) |
Choose the category below that best describes the study:
__ Adequate blinding measures for participants (placebo) and in assessment
of outcomes
__ Unclear blinding for participants or in outcome assessment
__ Inadequate blinding especially in outcome assessment
|
4. Were there clear a priori outcomes, similar
baseline characteristics between intervention group & control
group, groups treated equally except for intended intervention? |
Choose the category below that best describes the study:
__ All criteria met (or at least the latter 2)
__ Groups differ in some way but differences are handled in
analysis/non-critical
__ Groups differ and raise concerns about validity |
5. Was the intervention clearly delivered? (How sure
are we that the intervention patients received the intended protocol?) |
__ YES
__ NO
__ UNSURE |
6. Overall Quality Impression |
__ GOOD-all criteria met and no significant concerns with 4 or 5
__ FAIR-criteria 1-3 at least partly met and no significant concerns
with 4 or 5
__ POOR-at least one of first 3 criteria clearly not met
Comments:
|
Return to Document
Return to Appendix