Table 2. Counseling to Increase Intake of Fruit or Vegetables: Study Descriptions

Author
Year
Sample Population Level of Risk Baseline Patient Numbers Retention Rate Setting Intervention and Control Group
Counseling Provider and Resources
Intensity
Campbell et al., 199412

Tailored msg vs. control

Adult men and women of family practices: 2 urban and 2 rural in North Carolina, USA Unselected Intv: NR
Cont: NR
82% Mailings and computer-generated messages Intv: Self-administered surveys in office delivered by staff; messages mailed home

Cont: self-administered surveys only; no messages

Low
Coates et al., 199913 Post-menopausal in research clinics of Women's Health Trial
28% black, 16% Hispanic
At risk Intv: 1,324
Cont: 883
75% to 85% Research clinic Intv: RD-delivered group sessions weekly x 6 weeks, biweekly x 6 weeks, monthly x 9 months

Cont: given Dietary Guidelines for Americans; no counseling

High
Delichatsios, Friedman et al., 200114 Adult men and women in a large multisite, multi-specialty group practice—Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates in Massachusetts, USA; 72% women, 45% white, 45% black Unselected NR NR Mailings and computer-generated messages: home Intv: weekly diet-related educational feedback, advice, and behavioral counseling for 5-7 minutes by a totally automated, telephone-linked computer-based voice communication system

Cont: weekly physical activity-related educational feedback, advice, and behavioral counseling for 5-7 minutes by a totally automated, telephone-linked computer-based voice communication system

Medium
Delichatsios, Hunt et al., 200115 Adult men and women patients from 6 group HMO practices in the primary care research network of Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Massachusetts, USA Unselected Intv: 230
Cont: 274
Intv: 85%
Cont: 92%
Mailings and computer-generated messages Intv: mailed personalized dietary recommendations and 2 educational booklets; endorsement by 1 hour-trained MD or NP; 2 motivational phone counseling sessions by trained MPH student telephone counselors. RD consultation if needed.

Cont: NR

Medium
Knutsen and Knutsen, 199121 Adult men at increased risk for CVD and their families
Tromso, Norway
At risk 2,838 39% Research clinic Intv: MD or RD each made 1 home visit for CHD risk factor counseling and diet assessment and counseling

Cont: NR

Medium
Kristal et al., 200022 Adult men and women enrollees of Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound HMO, Washington, USA Unselected Intv: 729
Cont: 730
86.5% Mailings and computer-generated messages Intv: self-help materials, dietary analysis with behavioral feedback, and semi-monthly newsletters mailed home; trained health educator-delivered motivational phone call

Cont: usual care - no intervention

Medium
Lutz et al., 199931

Tailored msg w/ goal vs. control

Adult men and women Unselected Intv: 177
Cont: 180
81% Mailings and computer-generated messages Intv: self-administered assessment mailed home; tailored messages were mailed home

Cont: no newsletter

Low
Maskarinec et al., 199932 Healthy adult women over age 35 consuming less than 5 servings of fruit and vegetables daily in a study center
Hawaii, USA
Unselected Intv: 13
Cont: 16
88% Research clinic Intv: RD delivered monthly counseling sessions (1st 2 individual, next 3 group) with phone F/U as needed to increase fruits and vegetables

Cont: RD delivered general healthy eating counseling based on the USDA Dietary Guidelines

High
Roderick et al., 199728 Adult men and women with hypercholesterolemia in general practice from 4 regions,
United Kingdom
Unselected Intv: 473
Cont: 483
Intv: 86%
Cont: 74%
Primary care Intv: RNs on-site (trained for intv by RD) delivered dietary assessment, advice and F/U

Cont: standard health education materials

Small
Siero et al., 200033

Group education and tailored msg vs. control

Low income adult men and women at increased risk for CVD in primary care practices and at home,
The Netherlands
At risk Intv: NR
Cont: NR
NR Research clinic Intv: messages were mailed home; group sessions 2 hr each led by group instructor, not otherwise specified

Cont: received printed leaflet with the Dutch nutritional guidelines

High

Note: Cont indicates control; F/U, followup; Intv, intervention; msg, message; NP, nurse practitioner; NR, not reported; RD, registered dietician; RN, registered nurse.

 

Table 2. Counseling to Increase Intake of Fruit or Vegetables: Study Outcomes

Author
Year
Main Outcome Baseline
Values
Duration of
Followup
Final
Followup
Values
Change from
Baseline to
Final Followup
Net Difference
in Changea
or Difference at
Final Followup
P-value Relative
Changeb
Effect
Size
Campbell et al., 199412

Tailored msg vs. control

Servings of fruit and vegetables per day Intv: 3.6
Cont: 3.6
4 mo Intv: 3.3
Cont: 3.3
Intv: -0.3
Cont: -0.3
0 servings P = 0. 817 0% Small
Coates et al., 199913 Servings of fruit per day Intv: 1.53
Cont: 1.52
18 mo NR Intv: +0.54
Cont: +0.02
0.53 servings NR 35% Medium

Servings of vegetables per day

Intv: 1.62
Cont: 1.65

Intv: +0.35
Cont: +0.08

0.27 servings NR 16%
Delichatsios, Friedman et al., 200114 Combined fruits and vegetables Intv: 6.6
Cont: 5.9
6 mo Intv: 7.7
Cont: 5.6
Intv: +1.1
Cont: -0.3
1.4 servings NR 24% Large
Delichatsios, Hunt et al., 200115 Servings of fruit and vegetables per day Intv: 2.9
Cont: 3.3
Intv: 2.9
Cont: 3.3
Intv: 4.0
Cont: 3.7
Intv: +1.1
Cont: +0.4
0.7 servings NR 21% Medium
Knutsen and Knutsen, 199121 % of subjects eating > 4 fruits per week NR 6 yrs

Intv: 43%
Cont: 39%

NR 4% NR NA Small
% of subjects eating vegetables with dinner NR NR

Intv: 51%
Cont: 53%

NR 2% NR NA Small
Kristal et al., 200022 Servings of fruit and vegetables per day Intv: 3.62
Cont: 3.47
12 mo Intv: 4.09
Cont: 3.61
Intv: +0.47
Cont: +0.14
0.33 servings P < 0.001 10% Medium
Lutz et al., 199931

Tailored msg w/ goal vs. control

Mean servings of fruits and vegetables per day Intv: 3.5
Cont: 3.5
6 mo Intv: 4.4
Cont: 3.6
Intv: +0.9
Cont: +0.1
0.8 servings P < 0.002 23% Medium
Maskarinec et al., 199932 Servings of fruit and vegetables per day Intv: 3.2
Cont: 3.3
6 mo Intv: 7.4
Cont: 4.1
Intv: 4.2
Cont: 0.8
3.4 servings P = 0.0001 100% Large
Roderick et al., 199728 Servings of fruit and vegetables per week NR 12 mo NR Intv: 1.09
Cont: 0.03
0.94 servings NR NA Medium
Siero et al., 200033

Group education and tailored msg vs. control

Fruits and vegetables grams/day Intv: 426 g
Cont: 416 g
16 wks Intv: 494 g
Cont: 395 g
Intv: +68g
Cont: -21 g
+99 g NR 24% Medium

aBaseline minus followup value for the intervention group minus baseline minus followup value for the control group.
bAbsolute change in the intervention group from baseline to followup divided by the baseline value of the control group.

Note: Cont indicates control; Intv, intervention; msg, message; NA, not available; NR, not reported.

Return to Document