Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov

Table 2. Studies of Universal Newborn Hearing Screeninga

Author,
Year
Description (Quality Rating) Screening Tests #Screened/ #Available (%Screened) Yield & NNS to find 1 case of bilateral PHL #Positive Screen (%) #Followup %Lost to Followup Definition of High-Risk #Low-Risk Identified/ #Screened NNS #High-Risk Identified/ #Screened NNS
Wessex,
199838
Controlled, nonrandomized trial at 4 hospitals from 10/93 to 10/96 (Good) TEOAE followed by ABR 21,279/
25,609 (83)
23/21,279 925 342 (1.6)
NR
NR
NIH Criteria 7/19,555 2,794 20/1,724 86
Prieve,
200042
State-wide demonstration project at 7 perinatal centers, 8 hospitals in New York (Good) TEOAE followed by TEOAE or ABR in birth admission; TEOAE, ABR at 4-6 weeks (stage 2) 69,766/
71,922 (97)
49/69,736 1,422 4,699 (6.5%) 1st stageb 43.4 NICU infants 33/NR 2,041c 52/NR 208c
Vohr,
199824
Cohort from 8 maternity hospitals in Rhode Island from 1/93 to 12/96 (Fair) TEOAE followed by: ABR (HR infants) TEOAE and ABR in 2-6 weeks (LR infants) 52,659/
53,121 (99)
79/52,659 666c 5,397 (10.2%)
1st stage
677 (1.3%)
2nd stage
4,575 15.2
NICU infants 61/47,529 779d 50/5,130 103d
Finitzo,
199841
Cohort from 9 Texas hospitals from 1/94 to 6/97 (Fair) ABR or TEOAE in birth admission followed by either ABR or TEOAE at 1-8 weeks 52,508/
54,228 (97)
20/17,105 855c,e 1,787 (3.4%) 1,224 31.5 NR NR NR
Barsky-
Firsker,
199743
Hospital-based series at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, New Jersey 1/93 to 12/95 (Fair) ABR by audiologists. (One-stage) 15,749/
16,229 (97%)
NR 485 (3.1%) NR NR NICU infants 29/14,014 483 23/1,735 75
Watkin,
199644
Hospital-based series at Whipps Cross Hospital, England (Fair) TEOAE followed by TEOAE and ABR within 4 weeks 11,606/
14,353 (81)
19/11,606 755 337 (2.9%) 290 14 Risk Factors and/or NICU infants 7/NR 13/NR
Mehl,
199840
Cohort from 26 hospitals in Colorado from 1992 to 1996 (Poor) 19 ABR, 1 TEOAE, 6 ABR followup screen not reported 41,796/
NR
NR 2,709 (6.5%) 1,296 52.2 NR NR NR
Aidan,
199945
Hospital-based series in Paris, France of infants in normal newborn nursery (Poor) TEOAE in 48 hours; TEOAE within 4 weeks 1,421/
1,727 (82)
2/1,421
711
238 (16.7%)
123
48.3
Hypoxemia, hyperbili-
rubinemia, FH
2/1,421
711
NR
Clemens,
200046
Hospital-based series in North Carolina (Women's Hospital of Greensboro) from 7/98 to 6/99 (Poor) ABR followed by re-test for fails (stage 1a) or ABR (stage 1b); outpatient ABR and diagnostic ABR (stage 2) 5,010/
5,034 (99.5)
NR 103/5,054 85 17.5 NICU infants NR 4/454 114
Mason,
199839
Series of infants born at Kaiser, Honolulu from 3/92 to 2/97 (Poor) ABR 10,372/
10,773 (96)
12/10,372 864 415 (4.0%) 362 12.8 NICU infants 5/8,971 1,794 7/1,401 200

a ABR indicates automated auditory brainstem response; FH, family history; HR, high-risk; LR, low-risk; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; NIH, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference; NNS, number needed to screen; NR, not reported; PHL, permanent hearing loss (moderate or worse); TEOAE, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
b Reported different rates for misses and fails.
c Includes mild, bilateral hearing loss.
d Includes unilateral hearing loss.
e Data reported for 1996 only.


Return to Document

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care