Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov/
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov/

Table 2. Studies of Universal Newborn Hearing Screeninga

Author,
Year
Description (Quality Rating) Screening Tests #Screened/ #Available (%Screened) Yield & NNS to find 1 case of bilateral PHL #Positive Screen (%) #Followup %Lost to Followup Definition of High-Risk #Low-Risk Identified/ #Screened NNS #High-Risk Identified/ #Screened NNS
Wessex,
199838
Controlled, nonrandomized trial at 4 hospitals from 10/93 to 10/96 (Good) TEOAE followed by ABR 21,279/
25,609 (83)
23/21,279 925 342 (1.6)
NR
NR
NIH Criteria 7/19,555 2,794 20/1,724 86
Prieve,
200042
State-wide demonstration project at 7 perinatal centers, 8 hospitals in New York (Good) TEOAE followed by TEOAE or ABR in birth admission; TEOAE, ABR at 4-6 weeks (stage 2) 69,766/
71,922 (97)
49/69,736 1,422 4,699 (6.5%) 1st stageb 43.4 NICU infants 33/NR 2,041c 52/NR 208c
Vohr,
199824
Cohort from 8 maternity hospitals in Rhode Island from 1/93 to 12/96 (Fair) TEOAE followed by: ABR (HR infants) TEOAE and ABR in 2-6 weeks (LR infants) 52,659/
53,121 (99)
79/52,659 666c 5,397 (10.2%)
1st stage
677 (1.3%)
2nd stage
4,575 15.2
NICU infants 61/47,529 779d 50/5,130 103d
Finitzo,
199841
Cohort from 9 Texas hospitals from 1/94 to 6/97 (Fair) ABR or TEOAE in birth admission followed by either ABR or TEOAE at 1-8 weeks 52,508/
54,228 (97)
20/17,105 855c,e 1,787 (3.4%) 1,224 31.5 NR NR NR
Barsky-
Firsker,
199743
Hospital-based series at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, New Jersey 1/93 to 12/95 (Fair) ABR by audiologists. (One-stage) 15,749/
16,229 (97%)
NR 485 (3.1%) NR NR NICU infants 29/14,014 483 23/1,735 75
Watkin,
199644
Hospital-based series at Whipps Cross Hospital, England (Fair) TEOAE followed by TEOAE and ABR within 4 weeks 11,606/
14,353 (81)
19/11,606 755 337 (2.9%) 290 14 Risk Factors and/or NICU infants 7/NR 13/NR
Mehl,
199840
Cohort from 26 hospitals in Colorado from 1992 to 1996 (Poor) 19 ABR, 1 TEOAE, 6 ABR followup screen not reported 41,796/
NR
NR 2,709 (6.5%) 1,296 52.2 NR NR NR
Aidan,
199945
Hospital-based series in Paris, France of infants in normal newborn nursery (Poor) TEOAE in 48 hours; TEOAE within 4 weeks 1,421/
1,727 (82)
2/1,421
711
238 (16.7%)
123
48.3
Hypoxemia, hyperbili-
rubinemia, FH
2/1,421
711
NR
Clemens,
200046
Hospital-based series in North Carolina (Women's Hospital of Greensboro) from 7/98 to 6/99 (Poor) ABR followed by re-test for fails (stage 1a) or ABR (stage 1b); outpatient ABR and diagnostic ABR (stage 2) 5,010/
5,034 (99.5)
NR 103/5,054 85 17.5 NICU infants NR 4/454 114
Mason,
199839
Series of infants born at Kaiser, Honolulu from 3/92 to 2/97 (Poor) ABR 10,372/
10,773 (96)
12/10,372 864 415 (4.0%) 362 12.8 NICU infants 5/8,971 1,794 7/1,401 200

a ABR indicates automated auditory brainstem response; FH, family history; HR, high-risk; LR, low-risk; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; NIH, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference; NNS, number needed to screen; NR, not reported; PHL, permanent hearing loss (moderate or worse); TEOAE, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
b Reported different rates for misses and fails.
c Includes mild, bilateral hearing loss.
d Includes unilateral hearing loss.
e Data reported for 1996 only.


Return to Document

 

AHRQAdvancing Excellence in Health Care