Characteristic |
Prognostic Factor |
Studies Indicating an Association and Quality |
Strength of Association with Tumor Response |
Strength of Association with Survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|
c-kit mutation |
c-kit mutation present vs. absent |
Debiec-Rychter, et al., 2004 |
TTP: patients with C kit mutations less likely to progress (p = 0.03) |
patients with c-kit mutations with longer OS (p = 0.015) |
Exon 11 mutation |
Debiec-Rychter, et al., 2004 Heinrich, et al., 2003 |
EFS: c-kit exon 11 mutation with median EFS 849d; all other mutations EFS 327d HR 0.17 (0.10-0.29) p < 0.0001a |
HR 0.04 (0.01-0.12) |
|
Exon 9 mutation |
Heinrich, et al., 2003 |
HR 0.31(0.11-0.89) |
||
Other genes |
Gene SPRY4 (found to be downregulated by imatinib in in vitro pre-clinical studies) |
Frolov, et al., 2003 |
SPRY4 was "dramatically" decreased in 4/5 patients with PR, expressed at high levels in the 2/2 non-responders, and initially decreased then returned to high levels in the 1/5 PR patient who had an early relapse |
|
Gene MAFbx (found to be upregulated by imatinib in in vitro pre-clinical studies) |
Frolov, et al., 2003 |
Variable responses (2/5 PR patients had included levels of MAFbx; initially increased and then returned to pre-treatment levels in the patient with PR but early relapse; not changed at all in the one PD patient) |
||
Pathology |
GIST vs. other STS |
Verweij, et al., 2003 |
GIST with 73% DFS at 1yr Median TTP STS = 58d |
Abbreviations: TTP = time to progression; OS = overall survival; EFS = event free survival; HR = hazard ratio; STS = soft tissue sarcomas; DFS = disease-free survival.
Note:
a. In this
study hazard rations greater than one are predictive of poorer prognosis.