Key Question |
Studies, n |
Study Designs
(Reference) |
Quality |
Conclusions |
1. Penetrance of
hemo- chromatosis |
11 |
1 retrospective
cohort study46 |
Good: Genotyping of surviving
Brusselton, Australia, cohort;
potential selective mortality bias
appears minimal. Small
numbers. |
17 y of clinical data for 10 screening-detected
general population C282Y homozygotes
illustrates variable disease expression and
incomplete penetrance. Incomplete
followup into older age where disease
penetrance increases. |
| 1 retrospective and
prospective
cohort study47 |
Fair: Genotyping of representative
Danish cohort during third
examination. Results are likely
to be compromised by selective
mortality bias due to 35% loss
of followup. Even accounting
for potential bias, disease
penetrance about 60%. |
Additional 23 screening-detected C282Y
homozygotes from the general population
also illustrates variable disease penetrance
and variable patterns of iron accumulation.
No liver biopsies to confirm iron overload
or disease. |
| 9 cross-sectional
studies32,51-58 |
Fair to good: Studies compromised
by frequent inclusion of already-identified
C282Y homozygotes (not clearly screening-detected),
by different standards for
disease, and by potential
selection bias due to
non-protocol-based selection for
further clinical work-up. |
Estimates of disease in newly identified
C282Y homozygotes at screening are too
limited to provide confident estimates of
penetrance. |
2. Efficacy of
phlebotomy treatment |
5 |
4 case series25,58-60 |
Fair to poor: Studies compromised
by selective samples, reporting
on cases not clearly comparable
to current diagnosis and
treatment, incomplete followup
on all cases, and failure to
account for possible
confounders in analyses. |
Total number of reported cases is quite small
and represents disease experience over 50
y. There are no data to determine the
benefit of earlier treatment among
screening-detected compared with
contemporarily diagnosed clinical cases. |
| 1 retrospective
survey55 |
Fair: Possible recall bias in
determining response to
treatment. |
Treatment is recalled to relieve some but not
all symptoms in a survey of patients with
hereditary hemochromatosis. |
3. High-risk groups |
7 |
7 cross-sectional
studies51,57,61-63,65,66 |
Fair to good: Studies examined
prevalence of C282Y
homozygotes in various selective
populations for possible targeted
screening. |
Patients selected on basis of certain signs and
symptoms, in combination with phenotypic
testing, may be at increased risk; data are
still fairly limited. |