Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov

Table 2. Summary of Studies Evaluating Counseling to Increase the Use of Occupant Restraints among Children Age 4 Years or Older, Adolescents, and Adultsa

Study, Year (Reference) USPSTF Qualityb Study Design Sample Size, n Timing and Setting Groups and Intervention Components
Age 4-8 y
Gittleman et al., 200633 Fair to poor RCT 225 During ED visit; ED IG1: Certified car seat technician delivered a 5-min instruction on importance of booster seats, correct use, how to obtain a booster seat, and where to go for a fitting station
IG2: Same as IG1, plus received free booster seat with proper installation and instructions
CG: Standard discharge instructions from the ED
Age 9-19 y
Stevens et al., 200234 Fair Group RCT (cluster randomization) 12 clinics (3145 children) 34 contacts over 36 mo; WCC visits to pediatrician office IG: Received counseling from pediatrician, contract for family policy, letter, reminders at follow-up visits, biannual telephone calls alternating parent and child, brochure, newsletters for parents (12) and children (12) on gun safety, seat belt use, bicycle helmet use
CG: Received all the same contacts as the IG with the information targeting alcohol and tobacco use
Macknin et al., 198743 Fair CCT 385 Single contact; WCC visits IG: Physician-pediatrician asked a screening question about seat belt use; if yes—positive reinforcement; if no—give facts about seat belt use, and a contract promising use was signed patient and physician
CG: No mention of seat belt
Adults
Hempel, 199235 Fair to poor RCT 360 Single contact, Primary care center IG: Viewed a 6-min film explaining why one should wear seat belts; nurse practitioner gave an appeal to wear seat belts based on her personal conviction
CG: Viewed a 6-min film on general preventive health care guidelines with no mention of seat belts

(Table 2 continued)

Study, Year (Reference) Outcome Measured for Assessment Observation Time Point Results (IG vs. CG) Absolute Difference (IG vs. CG) (95% CI), percentage points Comments
Age 4-8 y
Gittleman et al., 200633 Self-reported booster seat use 1-mo post-ED visit IG1 vs. CG: 8.7% vs. 1.3% (P = NS)
IG2 vs. CG: 98.2% vs. 1.3% (P = NR)
IG2 vs. IG1 and CG: 98.2% vs. 5.5% (P < 0.001)
7.4 (-3 to 16)
96.9 (90 to 100)
92.7
Families who used booster seats at baseline were excluded from trial; study families all resided in low SES ZIP codes;
71%–77% African American; 35% attrition at 1 mo; differential attrition across groups
Age 9-19 y
Stevens et al., 200234 Self reported use 12 mo
24 mo
36 mo
OR (CG vs. IG), 0.87 (CI, 0.73 to 1.04) (P = 0.12)
OR (CG vs. IG), 0.96 (CI, 0.79 to 1.15) (P = 0.65)
OR (CG vs. IG), 0.89 (CI, 0.73 to 1.09) (P = 0.27)
Unable to calculate because use was NR for either CG or IG at any follow-up time point Children were in 5th or 6th grade when enrolling in study; baseline use 72%-74% in both groups; 31% attrition reported at all 3 time points; cannot calculate attrition at individual follow-up time points
Macknin et al., 198743 Observed use
Self-reported seat belt use
Postvisit
1 y
Those not wearing previsit vs. wearing postvisit:
IG, 38%; CG, 5% (P <0.001)
IG, 62%; CG, 67% (P = NS)
Unable to calculate
-5 (-20 to 10)
Enrolled children age 5-19 y; baseline use was 61%-63% in both groups; predominantly white, middle class; 0% attrition at postvisit, 35% attrition at 1 y
Adults
Hempel, 199235 Seat belt use assessed through questionnaire using a linear scale Baseline
6 mo
22% vs. 20%
37.3 vs. 33.6% (P = NS)
3.7 (-8 to 16) Rural, primarily indigent population; 25% attrition at 6 mo

Notes:
a. CCT = controlled clinical trial; CG = control group; ED = emergency department; IG = intervention group; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; OR = odds ratio; RCT = randomized, controlled trial; SES = socioeconomic status; USPSTF = U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; WCC = well-child care.
b. The USPSTF quality criteria are described in Appendix Table 5.

Return to Document

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care