1. Brook RH. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. In: McCormick KA, Moore SR, Siegel RA, editors. Clinical practice guidelines development:methodology perspectives. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994.
2. Hemingway H, Crook A, Feder G et al. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med 2001;344(9):645-654.
3. Kravitz RL, Park RE, Kahan JP. Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Policy 1997;42(2):135-143.
4. Shekelle PG, Chassin MR, Park RE. Assessing the predictive ability of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998;14(4):707-727.
5. McGlynn EA, Kosecoff J, Brook RH. Format and conduct of consensus development conferences: a multi-nation comparison. In: Goodman C, Baratz S, editors. Improving consensus development for health technology assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1990.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section