Table B-1. Priority Groups of Survey Measures Based on Feasibility and Degree of Focus on Care Coordination
||Degree of Focus on Care Coordination*
|Minimal (50% map)
||Strong (≥50% map)
|Short (≤50 items)
||Priority Group 1: Highest priority for further review. These measures likely have both good feasibility and strong relevance.
||Priority Group 3: Lower priority for further review, but potentially useful if higher priority measures are inadequate.
|Long (>50 items)
||Priority Group 2: Second priority for further review. These measures are likely highly relevant, but may have some feasibility concerns.
||Priority Group 4: Lowest priority for further review. These measures are likely less feasible and less relevant.
* Measures close to cut-points along both dimensions (length, focus) were elevated to next higher priority category than what categorization criteria specify here.
Return to Document