Medical Device Registries: Multiple Applications (Text Version) Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 9, 2008, Thomas P. Gross, M.D., M.P.H, made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (216 KB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Medical Device Registries: Multiple ApplicationsThomas P. Gross, MD, MPHDirectorDivision of Postmarket SurveillanceOffice of Surveillance & BiometricsCenter for Devices & Radiological HealthAHRQ Annual ConferenceRegistries for Evaluating Patient OutcomesBethesda, MDSeptember 9, 2008Slide 2Registry as a Vehicle: Regulatory ApplicationsThe slide shows an image of a driver in a car with a large cloud of smoke containing:Pre- & PostmarketSafety &/or EffectivenessDiscretionary & MandatorySurveillance & Observational StudyDescriptive & AnalyticSlide 3Registries: Premarket Perspective Potential ApplicationsProvide data to support development & design of clinical trials.Provide historical comparator data (if rigorous).Enhance safety assessments via broader analysis of adverse events.Provide access to product (outside of Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] trial).Expedite approval of device modifications or labeling.Slide 4Registries: Premarket Perspective Safety AssessmentAdhesion Barrier Device RegistryVoluntary, European experience, 4K patients.Adjunct to U.S. pivotal, randomized trial.Assess safety profile.Self-reported events, "reassuring" profile.Slide 5Registries: Premarket PerspectiveProduct AccessPFO Occluder Device RegistryWithdrawal of Humanitarian Device Exemption status.Submission of Premarket Approval Applications required (supported by clinical trials).Access to device for those outside of clinical trials.Voluntary, U.S., 2K patients.Slide 6Registries: Premarket PerspectiveDevice/Labeling ChangesIntra-ocular Lens (IOLs) RegistryAssess performance of IOLs in adults <60 years.Established by American Academy of Ophthalmology.Post-IOL acuity & adverse events on 7K eyes.Indications changed allowing for younger age use.Slide 7Registries: Postmarket PerspectivePotential ApplicationsProvide surveillance for "real-world" events.Assess generalizability of new technologies.Expedite time to market with reliable postmarket data.Provide vehicle for Post-approval Studies (PAS).Promote evidence development for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) national coverage decisions (NCDs).Slide 8INTERMACS: Enhanced SurveillanceData typeFood and Drug Administration (FDA) ReportsINTERMACSComplete informationNoYesValidated dataNoYesAdjudicated dataNoYesStandard definitionsNoYesRepresentativeNoWe hope soUnder-reportedYesWe hope notDenominator dataNoYesSlide 9INTERMACS: Post-approval StudiesProvides the necessary infrastructure: Patient consent, Institutional Review Board (IRB) sign-off, data acquisition & quality.Is cost efficient & allows for enhanced oversight.Accommodates different study designs: Temporary total artificial heart: single-arm registry; 30-day & 1 year survival, time on device, transplant rates, adverse events & product problems.Left ventricular assist device (LVAD): cohort design (recipients of designated device vs. concurrent recipients of other LVADs); similar outcome measures & including quality of life.Slide 10Registries: Postmarket Perspective Early "Real-World" Experience & Patient Assessment Survey (PAS)Drug-eluting Coronary Stent RegistryAssess "real-world" experience.Multiple sites (~50), 2K patients.Sites vary by private/academic, implanting volume, geographic distribution.Outcomes of interest: MACE, unanticipated events.Descriptive findings.Periodic follow-up at 1, 6, 12 months.Slide 11Registries: Postmarket Perspective Food and Drug Administration (FDA) PAS & CMS NCDCarotid Stent RegistryCarotid Stents: Initial: Vehicle for post-approval study.Assess "real-world" experience & training (3 levels).Multiple sites, 1K patients, 30-day follow-up.Adjudicated neurological events.Carotid Stents: Extension: Expand under CMS coverage.Explore risk factors associated with stenting.Multiple sites, 10K patients, 30-day follow-up.Slide 12Registries: Postmarket PerspectiveDiscretionary StudyHemostasis Device RegistryCollaborative effort with American College of Cardiology (use of National Cardiovascular Data Registry).~60 sites, 14K patients.Assess gender differences & device-specific risk of hemorrhagic complications.Slide 13Registries: From a Disease PerspectiveToxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS): Non-infectious inflammation post-surgery (mostly cataract removal).Results in blurred vision to glaucoma or corneal transplant.Outbreaks periodically reported.Device relatedness is an issue: Viscoelastics?Surgical instruments?Registry maintained at University of Utah & cases also accrued via American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) Web site.Augment TASS registry with spontaneous reports & assess utility for identifying suspect causative agents.Slide 14FDA Registry InitiativesExpand existing registries: National ICD registry (American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry [ACC NCDR] & Heart Rhythm Society [HRS]): add lead safety fields (lead revision, extraction, abandonment & reasons for failure).Conduct linkage studies with Medicare data: Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database: study long-term morbidity & mortality of transmyocardial revascularization.ACC NCDR: study long-term cardiac morbidity & mortality of drug-eluting coronary stents.Slide 15FDA Registry Initiatives (continued)Compare registry performance: Medicare claims vs. prospectively collected registry data from the Vascular Disease Study Group of Northern New England.Morbidity & mortality associated with endovascular vs. open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Nest investigational study within registry: Uses PAS to expand indications.Rigorous investigational study design.Slide 16FDA Registry InitiativesSentinel Initiative*: an effort to develop a national, integrated infrastructure of electronic healthcare data systems for medical product safety surveillance.Identify & characterize existing U.S. orthopedic implant registries. Explore potential for establishing distributed system.*http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/sentinelSlide 17Thanks for Your Attention!For further information: thomas.gross@fda.hhs.gov Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Medical Device Registries: Multiple Applications (Text Version). February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Gross.html