Methodological Issues in Systematic Review: Formulating Questions (Text Version) Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 10, 2008, Joseph Lau, made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (195 KB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Methodological Issues in Systematic Review—Formulating QuestionsJoseph Lau, MDTufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC)AHRQ Annual MeetingSeptember 10, 2008Slide 2Evidence Report/Technology AssessmentCover of Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease.Slide 3Analytic framework for omega-3 Fatty Acid (FA) intake and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)Diagram depicts relationships among: Target populations.Omega-3 Fatty Acid Consumption.Adverse Events.Tissue/Plasma Levels.Modifiers.Intermediate Outcomes/Biological Effects.Clinical Outcomes.Slide 4Specific Key QuestionsWhat is the efficacy or association of omega-3 fatty acids (DHA, EPA or ALA supplements, and fish consumption) in reducing CVD events (including all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, non-fatal CVD events, and new diagnosis of CVD)? In patients without known CVD (primary prevention) and with known CVD (secondary prevention).Slide 5Specific Key QuestionsRelative effects of omega-3 fatty acid sources, with specific emphasis on compositions, dosages, the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids, and potential interactions due to duration of intervention or exposure. What adverse events related to omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplements are reported in studies?Slide 6ParticipantsPrimary Prevention—patients without prior history of cardiovascular disease. Country.Background diet.Secondary Prevention—patients with prior history of cardiovascular disease.Slide 7InterventionsFish: Different kinds, preparation, amount, how intake was estimated.Fish oil supplements: Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/ Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).α-linolenic acid [ALA] (walnut, canola oil, flax seed, etc.)Slide 8Outcomes (endpoints)Clinical outcomes (events). Overall mortality.Stroke.Myocardial infarction.Sudden death.Revascularization.Surrogate/intermediate outcomes (biomarkers, measurements). Blood pressure.Lipid levels.Slide 9The PICO method to formulate research question on interventionsTable lists Participants—Interventions—Comparator—Outcomes (PICO): Primary prevention—Fish, fish oil, ALA—Placebo—Overall mortality.Secondary prevention—Dosage—No control—Sudden death.(Blank)—Background intake—Active comparator—Revascularization.(Blank)—Duration—(blank)—Stroke.(Blank)—(blank)—(blank)—Blood pressure.Slide 10Study designRandomized controlled trial (RCT).Cohort.Case-control.Cross-sectional.Other criteria. Study size.Year, language, etc.Slide 11Additional inclusion criteriaPublished English language literature.Experimental or observational studies.Reported original CVD outcome data and evaluated any potential source of omega-3 fatty acids.At least 5 human subjects.At least 1-year duration.Slide 12Issues in formulating a questionNarrow versus broad (for individual or population).Clinically meaningful and useful (based on sound biological and epidemiological principles).Very broadly defined questions may be criticized for mixing apples and oranges.Very narrowly focused questions may have no data or have limited generalizability and sometimes may lead to misinterpretations. Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Methodological Issues in Systematic Review: Formulating Questions (Text Version). February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Lau.html