Models to Inform Recommendations about Preventive Services (Text Version) Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 8, 2008, this presentation was made at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (146 KB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Models to Inform Recommendations about Preventive Services Perspective of the United States Preventive Services Task Force.Slide 2An RCT for Every Topic is an Unattainable Goal: TechnicalBehavioral interventions. Inability to maintain fidelity with treatment.Inability to control provider effects.Quality improvement interventions. Inconsistency of implementation.Difficulty in withholding interventions with what is viewed as high face validity.Contamination.Slide 3An RCT for Every Topic is an Unattainable Goal: TechnicalCommunity programs. Insufficient number of communities willing to be randomized.Inability to maintain fidelity with program parameters.Need for adaptability to gain cooperation.Need for adaptability to achieve effectiveness.Contamination.Slide 4The Parachute ProblemDo we really NEED an RCT? "....the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials....we think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence-based medicine organized and participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo- controlled crossover trial of the parachute...."Sackett. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2003;327:1459-61.Notes:In the upper right hand corner is an image of a man parachuting.Slide 5But Even More ImportantlyIt is not feasible to conduct an RCT for every topic for which clinical decisions must be made.Slide 6CRC: Options in 2008Something found in stool. Occult blood using guaiac (gFOBT). Un-rehydrated.Rehydrated.Occult blood using test that is more sensitive than guaiac.Fecal DNA.Something "seen" in the colon. Visual. Flexible sigmoidoscopy. Alone.With FOBT (several options).Colonoscopy.Radiographic. Dual contrast barium enema (DCBE).CT colonography (CTC).Slide 7Number of RCTs: CRC Screening Type of Test9 strategies against no screening.Would require 8 two-arm trials or a very large 8-arm trial (unrehydrated gFOBT already done).9 strategies against all other possible strategies alone.E.g. more sensitive FOBT versus unrehydrated FOBT. FOBT versus optical colonoscopy.Optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography.Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus fecal DNA etc. etc. etc.Would require 35 two-arm trials or a very large 8-arm trial.Slide 8It May be Impossible or Nearly Impossible To Conduct a Valid RCTStarting age. Age 40 or 50 or something else for CRC.Age 16 or 21 or something else for cervical cancer.Stopping age. Stop age 75 versus 85 for CRC.Stop age 65 versus 75 for cervical cancer.Screening interval. Every 5 years versus every 10 years versus once in a lifetime for CRC.Every year versus every 3 years versus every 5 years for cervical cancer.Slide 9Models: What If...Long-Term Financial Planning. What if I live to age 95, how much money will I need to live comfortably considering inflation and the rate of return on my investments? (Make a model).What do you recommend to assure that I don't run out of money? (Use the model to inform the recommendation).Slide 10Models: What If...Short-Term Financial Decisions. What if I buy a car that gets 65 miles per gallon, how much money will I save over five years considering the number of miles I drive? (Make a model).Should I buy a car that costs $34,000? (Use the model to inform the decision).Slide 11Models: What If...Policies. What if people in developing economies use the same number of barrels of crude oil per capita as people in the United States, in what year will the world supply of crude oil be exhausted? (Make a model).What does the committee recommend to assure that there is sufficient availability of energy for future generations? (Use the model to inform the recommendation).Slide 12Models: What If...Daily Decisions. What if I leave the office at 3 o'clock instead of 5 o'clock, how long will it take to get back home over the Bay Bridge considering the month, the day of the week and the weather? (Make a model).Should I leave early today to be sure that I am not late to dinner at the Smiths? (Use the model to inform the decision).Slide 13Models in the Context of Evidence-Based MedicineConscientious: careful, thorough, meticulous. Good models meet this criterion.Explicit: open, clear, plain. Modelers need to do this better.Judicious: sensible, well thought out. Good models meet this criterion.Slide 14Results From Good Models: Does This Information Help Make a Recommendation? The USPSTF Thinks the Answer is Yes.The table shows the results for testing for Cancer A.Test for cancer A. Start age: 20Stop age: 65Interval: 5 yrs.Estimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 265Test for cancer A. Start age: 25Stop age: 65Interval: 5 yrs.Estimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 263Test for cancer A. Start age: 30Stop age: 65Interval: 5 yrs.Estimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 243Slide 15Results From Good Models: Does This Information Help Make a Recommendation? The USPSTF Thinks the Answer is Yes.The table shows the results for testing for Cancer B.Test for cancer B. Start age: 40Stop age: 85Interval: 8 yrs.Estimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 301Test for cancer B. Start age: 40Stop age: 85Interval: 15 yrs.Estimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 267Test for cancer B. Start age: 40Stop age: 85Interval: onceEstimated number of life-years gained per 1,000 screened: 244Slide 16Models: the PushbackNot taught in most medical schools.Generalized antipathy; many people hate anything called a model.Assumptions are made; these often look like guesses.The model assumptions are often opaque.Slide 17ModelsInformation from models reduces bounds estimates.Information from models is better than information obtained by guessing, even informed guessing.A recommendation based on a good model is better than silence and is often the best we will ever do.Slide 18All models are wrong, some are useful.—George Box 1979Slide 19Discussion Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Models to Inform Recommendations about Preventive Services (Text Version). February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Models.html