Human Factors in Prescription Medication Management (Text Version) Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 8, 2008, Jonathan R. Nebeker, MS, MD, made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (1.2 MB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Human Factors in Prescription Medication ManagementJonathan R. Nebeker, MS, MDVA Salt Lake City GRECCSlide 2AcknowledgementsCharlene R. Weir, PhDFrank Drews, PhDMolly Leecaster, PhDRand Rupper, MPH MDKenneth Boockvar, MDBrittany Mallin, MS MPHAHRQ R18 HS017186VA Salt Lake City GRECCVA Salt Lake City IDEAS CenterSlide 3OverviewThe Electronic Health Record (EHR) context: CurrentFutureHow theory gets us to futureTheoretical FrameworkStudy designPreliminary FindingsSlide 4Current Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) Veterans Health Information Systems & Technology Architecture (VistA)The diagram shows:Access, presentation, and inputs: Tables, charts, lists, graphs, text fieldsLogical relationships: RemindersStorage of basic clinical information: Lab, pharmacy, vitals, reports/notes, demographicsEmphasis on accessInformation siloed in tabsSlide 5Future CPRS VistAThe diagram shows:Access, presentation, and inputs: Integrated tables, charts, lists, graphs, controls, text fieldsLogical relationships: Diagnoses and supporting evidence; treatments, conditions, and goals; prescriptive decision supportStorage of basic clinical information: Ontologies of lab, pharmacy, vitals, reports/notes, demographicsEmphasis on controlInformation integratedSlide 6Goal: EHR of futureThe colored photograph shows Star Trek characters Capt. Kirk, Dr. McCoy, and Spock watching over a sleeping Vulcan character in the medical wing.Slide 7Decision Support v. Sense MakingComputerized decision support is typically normative and targets the right decision.The CPRS of the future will emphasize an information-rich environment that targets sense making to support higher quality decisions in the highly variable context of patient care.Slide 8ProgressThe Electronic Health Record contextTheoretical Framework: (The pathway to the future)Joint Cognitive Systems or Cognitive Systems EngineeringContextual Control ModelStudy DesignPreliminary FindingsSlide 9Towards the FutureApply Cognitive Systems EngineeringHuman Factors in this talk: Not about usabilityAbout the human-computer systemSlide 10Joint Cognitive SystemsErik Hollnagel and David WoodsSystem of artifact(s) + human(s) that accomplishes work. Not what do human and computer do bestControl is a measure of the work's quality.Examples of JCS: ScissorsFighter jetsCombat robotsSlide 11Contextual Control Model (CoCoM)Performance in contextDifferent types of behaviors predict better outcomesFunctional not structural approachNot about information processing models: Memory, programs, etc.Used in engineered systems: ABS at SaabNuclear Power PlantsSlide 12CoCoM Main ConceptsCompetencies: possible actions in contextConstructs: assumptions about situationControl modes: characteristics of performance that govern quality of performanceFeed forward and feedback: anticipatory versus reactive controlSlide 13Control Cycle in HealthcareThe diagram shows a circle comprised of arrows rotating in a counter clockwise rotation which presents:Physician, Patient, Nurse, Pharmacist, Social Worker, etc. asking "What is going on?"Healthcare of PatientConstruct/Shared understanding of patient health: DeterminesAction/Care PlanProducesEvents/Feedback: DisturbancesModifiesAn inner red arrow suggests that the cycle repeats.Slide 14Control ModesScrambled: Lack of purposeful activityOpportunistic: Addressing salient characteristicsTactical: Following procedure, limited scopeStrategic: Broader scope and higher-level goalsSlide 15Control CharacteristicsGoal Complexity (Number and Interaction)Perceived Time PressureEvaluation of OutcomeSelection of ActionExpertiseMotivationFamiliaritySlide 16ProgressThe Electronic Health Record contextJoint Cognitive Systems Contextual Control ModelStudy DesignPreliminary Findings: Control characteristicsSlide 17Study GoalsImmediate Aim: Translate CoCoM to medication management for chronic diseasesExplore associations between control characteristics and surrogate outcomesNext Aim: Establish validity of adapted CoCoM control characteristics as predictor of higher quality outcomes through simulationNotes:Need to do formative workSome work done in medicine by Cook, Woods, and Cuschieri.Slide 18Study DesignSubjects: 40-50 physicians, mid-levels, residents, nurses, pharmacists in 5 outpatient clinics/4 States. Focus on hypertension (HTN).Think-aloud protocol + Interview.Saturation coding for control characteristics.Content analysis.Multi-dimensional scaling.Slide 19Preliminary FindingsSemi-QualitativeStories of control modes: ScrambledOpportunisticTacticalStrategicSlide 20Scrambled ModeType: Trial and error performance.Case of the new intern and forgetful patient.Low information quality and availability plus.Low experience.Slide 21Opportunistic ModeType: Reaction to salient characteristicsHave not seen yet for HTN: Reaction to systolic blood pressure (SBP) onlyPain syndromes even among experienced: Poor construct of problemLow information qualityVague goals: difficult to resolve competitionVague evaluation of outcome: not mentioned, then OK.Slide 22TacticalType: Following procedureDominant mode for HTNUse of protocolFocus on procedure* (forget clinical goal)Minimal consideration of interacting goalsLow use of feed-forward controlProblem with information quality-clinical inertiaLess common in highly experienced MDsSlide 23StrategicType: Broad consideration of contextAlmost exclusively with experienced MDsAwareness of protocols but deviation to accomplish conflicting patient goalsFamiliarity with past therapy a key factorFeed forward strategies account for physiologic and organizational factorsStill, incomplete use of explicit control limitsSlide 24ConclusionsCoCoM reveals interesting characteristics of system performance.High-mode characteristics have face validity for predicting better outcomes.Implications for software design: Need to support efficient, rich reconstruction of mental model of patientNeed to highlight interaction of goals and therapiesNeed to increase time horizon including feed forwardSlide 25The screen shot of medical software first shows Interventions, Conditions, and Goals for Spironolactone 25 mg po qday and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg po qday for Hypertension and then the line graphs for both Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure and K+ for Goals, and the line graphs for Lisinopril, Spironolactone, and Hydrochlorothiazide for Interventions. Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Human Factors in Prescription Medication Management (Text Version). February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Nebeker.html