Screening Administrative Data To Assess the Accuracy Of Present-on-Admission (POA) Coding Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 9, 2008, Michael Pine, M.D., M.B.A., made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (430 KB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Screening Administrative Data To Assess the Accuracy Of Present-on-Admission (POA) CodingMichael Pine, M.D., M.B.A.Michael Pine and Associates, Inc.Chicago, Illinois773-643-1700mpine@aol.comSlide 2OverviewRationale for Development of POA ScreensDevelopmental Database and Selection of CasesDescription and Aggregate Performance of 12 ScreensEvaluation of Coding By Individual HospitalsComputation of Composite Scores for HospitalsSlide 3Rationale for Development of POA ScreensPOA Code Identifies Hospital-Acquired Complications: Important in Computing Rates of Adverse OutcomesImportant in Risk-Adjusting Performance MeasuresAccurate Coding Requires Expertise and TeamworkInaccurate Coding: Affects Assessments of Clinical QualityAffects ReimbursementChart Reviews to Detect Coding Errors Are ExpensiveWell-Designed Screens Can Detect Problems EfficientlySlide 4Developmental DatabaseNew York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) Data from 2003 through 20058,388,179 Discharges from 246 HospitalsSecondary Diagnosis Codes Have POA Modifiers: "1" = Present on Admission"2" = Hospital-Acquired"9" = Status on Admission UnknownSlide 5Selection of Cases for ScreeningHigh-Risk Conditions By Principal Diagnosis: 33 Categories (e.g., septicemia, respiratory failure)Mortality = 9.2%; 70% of Deaths; 22% of DischargesElective Admissions for Selected Surgical Procedures: 7 Procedures (e.g., hysterectomy, knee replacement)Principal Diagnosis Consistent with ProcedureOperation During First 2 Days of HospitalizationInpatient Childbirth By Diagnosis or Procedure CodesSlide 6Diagnoses Almost Always Present on Admission231 Diagnosis Groups (e.g., malignancy, osteoporosis)Analyzed for Each of the 3 Sets of Cases ScreenedAggregate Data for Each Set: High-Risk Conditions: Number of Codes: 5,506,043Percent Inpatient: 1.13%Percent Unknown: 5.75%Elective Surgery: Number of Codes: 588,874Percent Inpatient: 0.63%Percent Unknown: 4.52%Inpatient Childbirth: Number of Codes: 112,987Percent Inpatient: 1.85%Percent Unknown: 8.93%Slide 7Complications in High-Risk ConditionsChronic Diagnoses with and without Acute Components: 21 Pairs (e.g., hernia with and without obstruction)Rates At Which Coded As Hospital-Acquired: Chronic without Acute: 1.06% of 1,612,079 DiagnosesChronic with Acute: 3.34% of 222,641 DiagnosesDiagnoses Frequently Hospital-Acquired (e.g., anuria): 3 Categories Based on Frequency Hospital-Acquired27 Diagnosis Groups in Category A; 59 in B; 54 in C: Category A—63.5% of 172,472 Codes Hospital-AcquiredCategory B—34.7% of 469,970 Codes Hospital-AcquiredCategory C—24.8% of 772,049 Codes Hospital-AcquiredSlide 8Mortality with Hospital-Acquired ComplicationsOnly for High-Risk ConditionsMortality Greater When Diagnosis Hospital-Acquired: 3 Categories Based on Ratio of Mortality Rates66 Diagnosis Groups in Category A; 54 in B; 64 in CAggregate Data for Each Category: A: Number POA Dx: 348,860Percent Dead:12.6%Number Hosp Dx: 27,406Percent Dead: 27.0%Odd Ratio: 2.57B: Number POA Dx: 747,172Percent Dead: 15.3%Number Hosp Dx: 80,856Percent Dead: 25.2%Odd Ratio: 1.87C: Number POA Dx: 1,335,879Percent Dead: 21.2%Number Hosp Dx: 247,144Percent Dead: 30.5%Odd Ratio: 1.64Slide 9Complications in Elective Surgical AdmissionsDiagnoses Frequently Hospital-Acquired Complications: 64 Diagnosis Groups (e.g., septicemia, shock)Of 138,655 Codes, 68.3% Hospital-AcquiredChronic Diagnoses with and without Acute Components: 21 Pairs (e.g., asthma with and without exacerbation)Rates At Which Coded As Hospital-Acquired Chronic without Acute: 0.39% of 187,453 DiagnosesChronic with Acute: 18.72% of 2,174 DiagnosesSlide 10Risk-Adjusted Post-Op Lengths of Stay (LOS)High Rates of Prolonged LOS in Uncomplicated CasesDevelop Predictive Equations for Routine Post-Op LOS: Compute Observed (OBS) Minus Predicted (PRED) Post-Op LOSFor All Live Discharges at Each Hospital: Create XmR Control Charts of OBS minus PRED LOSRemove Outliers with Prolonged Post-Op LOSRepeat Process Until No Further Outliers IdentifiedSet Upper Bound at Median Outlier Rate for All HospitalsRepeat Process Using Only Uncomplicated Cases: Compute Outlier Rates for Each HospitalIdentify Hospitals with Rates Greater Than Upper BoundSlide 11Risk-Adjusted Post-Op Lengths of Stay: Live Discharges with and without Reported ComplicationsThe graph measures the "Average," "3 Std Dev," "Normal LOS," "Long LOS with Cpl," and "Long LOS without CPL." The graph's vertical axis, "OBS LOS minus PRED LOS-days," goes from -10 to 60 and the horizontal axis, "Sequence Identifier," goes from 1 to 511. "Average" was 0 days; "3 Std Dev" was 5 days; "Normal LOS" had a range between -4 to 6 days; "Long LOS with Cpl" had a range between 6 to 42 days; and "Long LOS without Cpl" was recorded only three times at 5, 6, and 16 days.Slide 12Risk-Adjusted Post-Op Lengths of Stay: Live Discharges with and without Reported ComplicationsThe graph measures the "Average," "3 Std Dev," "Normal LOS," and "Long LOS without CPL." The graph's vertical axis, "OBS LOS minus PRED LOS-days," goes from -10 to 60 and the horizontal axis, "Sequence Identifier," goes from 1 to 491. "Average" was 0 days; "3 Std Dev" was 5 days; "Normal LOS" had a range between -3 to 4 days, and "Long LOS without Cpl" was recorded only six times at 7, 6, 5, 16, 6, and 5 days.Slide 13Complications in Obstetrical AdmissionsDiagnoses Usually Present on Admission: 7 Diagnosis Groups (e.g., multiple gestation)Of 448,242 Codes, 5.19% Hospital-AcquiredFifth Digit Codes Incompatible with Inpatient Delivery: 737,125 Inpatient DeliveriesFifth Digit = "0" or "3" or "4" in 0.27%Inpatient Post-Partum Complications: 74,669 Cases with Obstetrical Fifth Digit = "2"No Diagnosis Coded As Hospital-Acquired in 36.5%Slide 14Initial Analyses of Hospital Coding226 Hospitals Screened with One or More Measures22 Hospitals Have More Than 10% UnknownsDiagnoses Almost Always Present on Admission: Less Than 2% of Diagnoses Hospital-Acquired: High-Risk Conditions: Number of Hospitals: 200Percent Meeting Criterion: 91.5%Elective SurgeryNumber of Hospitals: 123Percent Meeting Criterion: 89.4%Inpatient Delivery: Number of Hospitals: 48Percent Meeting Criterion: 45.8%Slide 15Hospital Coding for High-Risk ConditionsChronic Diagnoses with Acute Components: Hospital-Acquired Rate Greater Than 2% AND Greater Than Twice Rate for Chronic CodesOf 145 Hospitals, 71.7% Met CriteriaDiagnoses Frequently Hospital-Acquired: Hospital-Acquired Rate Greater Than 15% for Category B Diagnoses AND Rate Monotonically Decreasing from Category A to Category COf 181 Hospitals, 83.4% Met CriteriaSlide 16Hospital Mortality Rates for High-Risk ConditionsCompute Predicted Mortality Rates: Indirect Standardization within Each CategoryBased on Rates for Diagnoses Present on AdmissionOdds Ratio of Observed to Predicted Mortality Rates: Greater Than 1.60 for All Diagnoses ORGreater Than 1.30 for All Diagnoses AND Greater Than 1.60 for Diagnoses in Categories A and BOf 184 Hospitals, 82.6% Met CriteriaSlide 17Hospital Coding for Elective Surgical AdmissionsDiagnoses Frequently Hospital-Acquired Complications: Hospital-Acquired Rate Greater Than 65%Of 175 Hospitals, 61.1% Met CriterionChronic Diagnoses with Acute Components: Compute 2 Standard Deviation Lower Bounds for Hospital-Acquired Rates: Hospital-Acquired Rate Greater Than 12% AND Greater Than Three Times Rate for Chronic Codes ORLower Bound Greater Than Twice Rate for Chronic CodesOf 93 Hospitals, 96.8% Met CriteriaSlide 18Prolonged Risk-Adjusted Post-Op Length of StayMedian Outlier Rate for All Live Discharges = 5.36%Outlier Rates for Uncomplicated Cases Less Than Upper Bound: In 81.5% of 178 HospitalsIn 98.4% of 64 Reference HospitalsIn 71.9% of 114 Remaining HospitalsSlide 19Hospital Coding for Obstetrical AdmissionsDiagnoses Usually Present on Admission: Hospital-Acquired Rate Less Than 3%Of 134 Hospitals, 63.4% Met CriterionFifth Digit Codes Incompatible with Inpatient Delivery: Less Than 0.5% of Obstetrical Codes IncompatibleOf 134 Hospitals, 87.3% Met CriterionCases with Inpatient Post-Partum Complications: Less Than 20% without Hospital-Acquired DiagnosisOf 123 Hospitals, 41.5% Met CriterionSlide 20Composite Hospital ScoringRange of Points Assigned to Each Measure: Range from 1 to N with N = 4, 5, 8, or 10Score Only for 204 Hospitals with Adequate DataScore Measure Only When Volume Criteria MetFor Each Hospital, Compute: Total of Points Scored for Each MeasureMaximum and Minimum Possible PointsFor Each Measure, Compute Average of Points ScoredObtain Final Adjusted Hospital Scores By InterpolationSlide 21Final Adjusted Hospital ScoresHospital Average: Total: 77.8Maximum: 96Minimum: 12Adjusted Score: 77.8Adjusted Score percent: 81.1%Hospital A: Total: 96Maximum: 96Minimum:12Adjusted Score: 96.0Adjusted Score percent: 100%Hospital B: Total: 61Maximum: 61Minimum: 8Adjusted Score: 96.0Adjusted Score percent: 100%Hospital C: Total: 66Maximum: 96Minimum: 12Adjusted Score: 66.0Adjusted Score percent: 68.8%Hospital D: Total: 61Maximum: 68Minimum: 8Adjusted Score: 82.7Adjusted Score percent: 86.2%Hospital E: Total: 54Maximum: 57Minimum: 7Adjusted Score: 88.8Adjusted Score percent: 92.5%Hospital F: Total: 48Maximum: 82Minimum: 10Adjusted Score: 55.7Adjusted Score percent: 58.0%Slide 22Screening and Improvement of POA CodingThe flow chart shows the cycle:POA ScreeningPerformance EvaluationProcess AnalysisIdentification of Opportunities for ImprovementPlan for ImprovementIntervention in Process Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Screening Administrative Data To Assess the Accuracy Of Present-on-Admission (POA) Coding. February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Pine.html