Selecting Indicators for Public Reporting: The Ohio Experience (Text Version) Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 9, 2008, Michele Shipp, M.D., Dr.P.H., made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (1 MB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Selecting Indicators for Public Reporting: The Ohio ExperienceAHRQ Annual Conference 2008AHRQ Quality Indicators (QI) Users MeetingWednesday, September 9, 2008Hospital Measures Reporting in OhioMichele Shipp, M.D., Dr.P.H.Slide 2Ohio Department of Health Hospital Performance Measures SelectionAlvin Jackson, M.D. Dr. Jackson, the Director of the Health Department, served as the Chair of the Hospital Measures Advisory CouncilMadelyn Dile, J.D. Madelyn Dile—Assistant Chief for the Division of Quality Assurance—facilitated the meetingsJodi Govern, J.D. Jodi Govern J.D., also at the Division of Quality Assurance, filled in in case of Madelyn's absence and facilitated the Infection Control Group meetingKaliyah Shaheen, M.P.H. Kaliyah Shaheen, Data Manager for the Division of Quality Assurance, was appointed by Dr. Jackson as his Data Expert and served as a member on the Data Expert Group along with serving as a member of the Infection Control Group and has been the contact for Council members. Also, Ms. Shaheen has been the main data person involved in the process at ODH; she also will be managing the reporting Web siteSlide 3BackgroundNo textSlide 4House Bill (HB) 197HB 197 became law in November 2006: Requires Ohio hospitals to report performance measure data to the Ohio Department of Health for the purpose of public reportingThe intent of the Bill has always been to assist with consumer decision-making through public reporting, and to promote transparency among hospitals.Slide 5HB 197 Required Measure SetsCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)The Joint Commission (JC)National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed measuresAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Slide 6Creation of Advisory CouncilA Hospital Measures Advisory Council was created by statute and consisted of: Director of Health (Council Chair)Two members of the House of RepresentativesTwo members of the SenateSuperintendent of InsuranceExecutive Director of the Commission on Minority HealthRepresentatives from several agenciesSlide 7Creation of other GroupsMandated Groups: A Data Expert GroupAn Infection Control GroupAd Hoc Groups: The Advisory Council created Pediatric and Perinatal workgroupsSlide 8Process for Measures SelectionData Expert Group monthly meetingsCreation of set criteria as guidelinesExamination of measure specificationsSelection of measuresRecommendations to Advisory Council on selected measuresSlide 9Measure Selection CriteriaImportance: Do the measures reflect unequivocally important aspects of patient care?Preventability: Can a poor score be prevented through proper care?Is excess variation in the data accounted for by factors unrelated to hospital quality?Genuine quality improvement: Can a hospital's rate be improved without improving quality?Slide 10Measure Selection Criteria (cont.)Data integrity: Can a hospital accurately collect the data from its records?Does the measure adequately measure the construct it attempts to measure?Ability to publicly report: Is the measure of use to consumers?Is the measure comprehensible to consumers?Do hospitals have a sufficient case load to accurately report quality?Burden: Does calculating the measure place undue burden on hospitals?Slide 11Measure Selection Criteria (cont.)Evidence-based: Is there scientific research demonstrating the accuracy and importance of the measure?Variance: Is there sufficient variability in performance among hospitals to allow for comparison?National Quality Forum endorsement: Is the measure endorsed by the National Quality Forum?Slide 12Overview of Selected MeasuresAll measures from 4 required sources consideredTotal of 84 measures were recommended to the Advisory Council: 47 CMS measures17 AHRQ measures10 JC measures10 Infection measuresSlide 13AHRQ: Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs)The Data Expert Group recommended the following AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators to the Advisory Council: PSI-1: Complications of AnesthesiaPSI-3: Decubitus UlcerPSI-5: Foreign Body Left During ProcedurePSI-9: Postoperative Hemorrhage or HematomaPSI-16: Transfusion ReactionPSI-17: Birth Trauma—Injury to NeonatePSI-18: Obstetric Trauma- Vaginal Delivery with InstrumentPSI-19: Obstetric Trauma—Vaginal Delivery without instrumentPSI-20: Obstetric Trauma—Cesarean DeliverySlide 14AHRQ: Inpatient Quality IndicatorsThe Data Expert Group recommended the following AHRQ Inpatient Quality Indicators for inclusion: IQI-5: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) volumeIQI-6: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PCTA) volumeIQI-12: CABG mortality rateIQI-30: PCTA mortality rateIQI-21: Cesarean Delivery RateIQI-22: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Rate, UncomplicatedIQI-33: Primary Cesarean Delivery RateIQI-34: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Rate, AllSlide 15AHRQ: Recommended MeasuresAfter consideration and voting by the Advisory Council, 7 of the 17 AHRQ measures were recommended to the Director of Health for public reporting: PSI-1: Complications of AnesthesiaPSI-3: Decubitus UlcerPSI-5: Foreign Body Left During ProcedureIQI-5: CABG volumeIQI-6: PCTA volumeIQI-12: CABG mortality rateIQI-30: PCTA mortality rateIf passed through the rule-making process, hospitals will begin reporting these measures in late 2009.Slide 16Current Hospital Reporting in OhioApril 2007 Hospital reporting start date by HB 197ODH selected 11 measures for interim reporting2 of these measures were from AHRQReporting done April and October 2007, 2008Slide 17Hospital Reporting Beginning April 2007Postoperative Respiratory Failure: AdultPediatricIatrogenic Pneumothorax: AdultPediatricNeonateSlide 18Current Reporting Feedback from HospitalsPostoperative Respiratory FailureOhio has found the numbers are too small for Iatrogenic Pneumothorax and may not be the best measure for the purpose of public reporting: Only 2 hospitals in the adult category and 1 hospital in the neonatal category had reportable dataSlide 19Iatrogenic Pneumothorax—PediatricsPie chart representing 187 hospitals between October 1, 2006-September 30, 2007, indicates: 0%—about two-thirdsNo Cases—about one-sixthNot Enough Cases—about one-sixthSlide 20Other Measures Currently Being ReportedAspirin at Arrival for Acute Myocardial InfarctionBeta Blocker at Arrival for Acute Myocardial InfractionPneumococcal Vaccination for PneumoniaBlood Culture before Initial Antibiotic for PneumoniaACEI or ARB Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction for Heart FailureEvaluation of Left Ventricular Systolic function for Heart FailureSlide 21Next StepsAdopt rules reflecting recommended measures: Six to nine month process: Public comment periodPublic hearingReporting of new measures to begin no earlier than October 2009.Development of the consumer Web site: To be operational by January 2010Slide 22Thank YouIf you have any questions please contact Kaliyah Shaheen at 614-995-4982 or kaliyah.shaheen@odh.ohio.govSeptember 2008 Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Selecting Indicators for Public Reporting: The Ohio Experience (Text Version). February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Shipp.html