Design of Patient-Centered Care Health IT: Patient Advisor Involvement Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2008 conference showcasing Agency research and projects. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2008 Annual ConferenceOn September 9, 2008, Patricia Sodomka, FACHE, made this presentation at the 2008 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (3.2 MB; Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Design of Patient-Centered Care Health ITPatient Advisor involvement in ePHR Design and Outcomes Research Patricia Sodomka, FACHESenior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc.Director, Center for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, Medical College of GeorgiaAHRQ's 2008 Annual Conference Promoting Quality—Partnering for ChangeSeptember 7-10, 2008Bethesda, MDSlide 2Goals for this PresentationOverview of ePHR [electronic personal health record] Design Development and Outcomes Research Project.Impact of Patient and Patient Advisor Involvement in e-PHR Research Project.Findings to date.Note: "This project was supported by grant number R18HS017234 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality."Slide 3Who We AreHealth Sciences University for the 34 unit University System of Georgia founded 1828.5 Schools (Medicine, Allied Health, Nursing, Dentistry, Graduate Studies).Tertiary Academic Medical Center.632 bed facility includes Adult and Children's hospitals, Ambulatory Care Center, Radiation Therapy Center.110 specialty clinics—Georgia and South Carolina.Network of 7 critical access and rural hospital affiliates.21,000 Admissions.508,000 Ambulatory Care Visits.Slide 4The slide shows an outline of the state of Georgia with an image of an "AHA CEO Toolkit," (shown in the picture as a videocassette and literature entitled, "Leadership") and a photograph from a PBS series entitled, "Remaking American Medicine."Slide 5The slide shows the cover of the September 1999 issue of BMJ entitled, "Embracing Patient Partnership."Slide 6Using an Electronic Personal Health Record to Empower Patients with Hypertension""Overall Project Goal." Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of an ePHR in a population of ambulatory patients with hypertension.Slide 7Grant Investigative Team StructureProject Leaders: Principal Investigator (PI): Pat Sodomka, FACHE, MCG PFCC Center.Co-I: Peggy Wagner, Ph.D., MCG Family Medicine.Reporting to the Project Leaders:Technology Leaders: Charlotte Weaver, Ph.D., RN, Cerner.Harold Scott, MC GHI Information Technology.Research Leaders: Peggy Wagner, Ph.D., MCG Family Medicine.Study Coordinators (2) (TBD).Yoon-Ho Seol, Ph.D., MCG Health Informatics.Jim Dias, PhD, MCG Biostatistics.Data Manager (TBD)—MCG.Ambulatory Operations: Sandy Hobbs, M.S.N., MCG Ambulatory Care Clinic.Shilpa Brown, M.D., MCG Internal Medicine.Bruce Leclair, M.D., MPH, MCG Family Medicine.Nurse Clinician (TBD).Guy Reed, M.D., MCG Chief of Cardiology.Joseph Hobbs, M.D., MCG Chair of Family Medicine.PFCC Leaders: Beverley Johnson, Institute for Family Centered Care.Marie Abraham, Institute for Family Centered Care.Patient Advisors (local and national).Slide 8The Essential Role of the Patient AdvisorThe slide shows a black and white photograph of a woman writing on a white board.Christine Abbott.Lead Patient Advisor—ePHR Study.Slide 9Impact of Patients and Patient Advisors in Research Project on:Research Methods.Design of PHR.Dialogue with Physicians.Slide 10Project AimsIncorporate Patient and Family Centered Care (PFCC) into the ePHR.Test the effectiveness of the ePHR in hypertensive patients.Measure the impact on system adoption of PFCC.Slide 11The Role That ePHRs Can PlayOffer the opportunity for patients to accumulate and manage their own information, track goals, track progress toward goals, manage meds, coordinate care.Transparency and access to information important features—link to the clinical information system strengthens benefits.Slide 12Aim 1—Modifying our ePHR: My HealthLinkModifications based on MS study.WAVE 1 data collection.National Advisory input.Modifications based on WAVE 1 and National Advisory input.WAVE 2 data collection.Final modifications based on WAVE 2.Main Trial.Slide 13Aim 2: The TrialThe slide shows an organization chart.20 Physicians. 10 Internal Medicine. 5 ePHR. 180 Intervention Patients (36 per physician).5 Care as Usual. 180 Control Patients (36 per physician).10 Family Medicine. 5 ePHR. 180 Intervention Patients (36 per physician).5 Care as Usual. 180 Control Patients (36 per physician).Slide 14Outcome Measures4 visits—every 3 months.Biological measures. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference.Fasting glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL).Patient empowerment measures. Patient activation (PAM).Patient assessment of chronic illness care.Consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems.Slide 15Outcome MeasuresPatient/Physician Collaboration Measures. Audiotapes of 100 intervention and 100 control visits at initial and 3-month visit. Content of communication.Taxonomy of requests from patients.Patient Utilization Measures. Self-reported utilization.Electronic abstraction.Adherence to Practice Guidelines. Chart review.Slide 16Initial Findings: Wave 1 of Aim 115 patients, 9 interviewed.Themes developed through iterative process. User Themes.Themes about general ePHR issues.Technology Themes.Notes:15 patients recruited, 9 interviewed. Themes developed by 3 research staff and classified into User Themes, ePHR themes, and Technology themes. Tech themes were discussed with project team as in subsequent slides.Slide 17ePHR Aim 1-Wave 1—Categorized ThemesThe diagram shows how ePHR can present "User Themes," "System Themes," and "Technology Themes."Notes:Order of slides changed per Peggy. Let's do the larger context first and then focus in on the tech themes.Slide 18Initial Findings: Wave 1 of Aim 17 technology themes identified.40 specific suggestions.Rank ordered suggestions by importance and feasibility through collaborative process including patients.Slide 19Initial Findings: Wave 1 of Aim 1Technology themes included:Navigation issues.Linkages within and external to PHR.Content corrections.Health tracking.Diary functionality.Expanded medication coverage.Access to PHR data.Notes:I would give examples of each.Navigation issues—make words have meaning, make it more intuitive.Linkages—external such as health literacy. Internal such as directions to offices.Content: expanded appointment scheduleing.Health tracking:encourage frequent bp recording.Diary: ability to personalize.Medication: clarify data entry discussions.PHR data: control access of which providers see what.Slide 20Implementation of Patient SuggestionsWave 2: 8.Main Trial: 8.Future: 1.Patient Training: 4.Ranked Zero: 11.Not technically feasible: 7.Policy issue: 1.Slide 21National Sample Quotes Hypertension Patient Panel"And he talks to me differently because he knows I can click on something and I know about it."Slide 22National Sample Quotes Hypertension Patient Panel"We don't waste a lot of time on history, on how have you been, what have you done? It's more we had goals and where are you at now with that? How's this working out? I feel like my 15 minutes is fully packed. Whereas before 10 of it is spent trying to get where we needed to be."Slide 23National Sample Quotes Hypertension Patient Panel"In the past, if my labs were off, my primary would call and say I needed to make an appointment. We need to talk. But now, I can see if I need to make a goal before I see him. It makes for a better more productive visit."Slide 24Using Patient Advisors in ResearchNot as subjects, as advisors.Different language, different values.Especially when designing patient systems.Patient perspectives are different than what clinicians, information technology (IT) workers, or researchers think.Clarity increases.Slide 25AppendixSlide 26My HealthLinkSlide 27The slide shows a screen shot of the homepage from "My HealthLink's" Web site with "Search For: Warfarin, in: Medications" highlighted in the two drop boxes.Slide 28The slide shows a screen shot of the "Hypertension Center" page.Slide 29The slide shows a screen shot of the homepage with "MCG Info" highlighted.Slide 30The slide shows a screen shot of the "Medication Information" page with "Topamax" highlighted.Slide 31The slide shows a screen shot of a page giving both an overview and links to various questions concerning the use of "Topiramate (oral)."Slide 32The slide shows a screen shot of the "Hypertension Center" page with a sub screen opened showing "My Plan," and "Medication Schedule."Slide 33The slide shows a screen shot of a "Graph" page. This one shows a patient's blood pressure being graphed over a week's time.Slide 34The slide shows a screen shot of the "Directory of Links" page.Slide 35The slide shows a screen shot of the "Glossary of Terms" page.Slide 36The slide shows a screen shot of the homepage from the "familydoctor.org's" Web site with "Dictionary" highlighted in the menu.Slide 37The slide shows a screen shot of the "Health Information" page from the "My HealthLink's" Web site.Slide 38The slide shows a screen shot of the "Maps and Directions" page.Slide 39The slide shows a screen shot of the "Online Appointment" page. Current as of February 2009 Internet Citation: Design of Patient-Centered Care Health IT: Patient Advisor Involvement. February 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2008/Sodomka.html