AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators: Constructive Use for Improvement (Text Version)

On September 15, 2009, Cynthia Barnard made this presentation at the 2009 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (3.41 MB) (Plugin Software Help).

Slide 1

September 15, 2009.
AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators:
Constructive Use for Improvement

Presented to

AHRQ Annual Conference

By
Cynthia Barnard MBA MSJS CPHQ
Director, Quality Strategies

Northwestern Memorial
HealthCare
 

Slide 2

Agenda

• Framework for PSI analysis within the hospital
  • Making Sense To Clinicians
• Case Studies
• Conclusions and Recommendations

Slide 3

Northwestern Memorial HealthCare

Feinberg and Galter Pavilions
May 1, 1999
New Prentice Women's Hospital October 20, 2007
 

• 873-bed Nationally Recognized Academic Medical Center
• Primary Teaching Hospital for Northwestern University since 1925
• Nationally Ranked for Quality
• New World-Class Facilities in 1999 and 2007
• Aa/AA Category Bond Rating for Over 25 Years

Slide 4

NMH Recognized for Quality and Excellence

• Magnet Certification since 2006
• 11 Specialties in 2009 U.S. News & World Report of Best Hospitals
• 2005 National Quality Health Care Award
• "Most Preferred Hospital" for 14 Years (NRC)
• Leapfrog Group's "Top Hospitals List" twice
• Named to "100 Best Companies for Working Women" for 9 Years
• "Most Wired" for 9 years
• Among University Healthsystem Consortium Top 15 in Quality and Accountability

Slide 5

Quality and Patient Safety Program

• Eliminate avoidable adverse events
• Deliver evidence-based care
• Enable the best possible outcomes

Slide 6

Eliminate Avoidable Severe Adverse Events Avoidable Severe Adverse Events (G,H,I)

Total Incidents Reported
Severe Harm
# of Severe Harm Events
# of Incidents Reported
 

Slide 7

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

• AHRQ Quality and Patient Safety Indicators (QIs/PSIs) are measures of health care quality that make use of readily available hospital inpatient administrative data.
• To improve the quality of healthcare, accessible and reliable indicators are needed to:
  • Flag potential problems or successes
  • Follow trends over time
  • Identify disparities across regions, communities and providers
  • Address multiple dimensions of care

Slide 8

AHRQ - Quality Indicators

• Inpatient Quality Indicators, 2002
  • Reflect quality of care inside hospitals including inpatient mortality for medical conditions and surgical procedures.
• Patient Safety Indicators (PSI), 2003
  • Reflect quality of care inside hospitals, but focus on potentially avoidable complications and iatrogenic events
  • Screen for adverse events that patients experience as a result of exposure to the health care systems
  • Target events that are likely amenable to prevention by changes at the system provider level
  • Includes 20 indicators

Slide 9

Patient Safety Indicators

Slide 10

Example of PSI Specification

• Iatrogenic Pneumothorax, (PSI 6)
• Provider Level Definition (only secondary diagnosis)
• Definition: Cases of iatrogenic pneumothorax per 1,000 discharges.
• Numerator: Discharges with ICD-9-CM code of 512.1 in any secondary diagnosis field.
• Denominator: All medical and surgical discharges age 18 years and older defined by specific DRGs.
• Exclude cases: . with ICD-9-CM code of 512.1 in the principal diagnosis fiel . MDC 14 (pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium) . with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of chest trauma or pleural effusion . with an ICD-9-CM procedure code of diaphragmatic surgery repair . with any code indicating thoracic surgery or lung or pleural biopsy or assigned to cardiac surgery DRGs
• Empirical Perf: Population Rate (2003): 0.562 per 1,000 population at risk
• Risk Adjustment: Age, sex, DRG, comorbidity categories

Slide 11

Administrative Data for Quality Metrics

Slide 12

NMH Patient Safety Indicators
 

Slide 13

Framework for PSI Use

Slide 14

Framework

• Coded accurately?
• Definition omits important clinical factors?
• Actual clinical process problem?

Similar approaches:
Houchens, Elixhauser, Romano. How Often are Potential Patient Safety Events Present on Admission? Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, March 2008
Henderson, et al. Clinical Validation of the AHRQ Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Patient Safety Indicator. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, July 2009

Slide 15

Case Studies

• CODING
• Foreign Body Retained
• Infection Due to Medical Care
• DEFINITION
• Post-op Bleed
• CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT
• Pneumothorax
• Post-op PE / DVT

Slide 16

Framework on a Small Sample (2007)

Slide 17

Clinical Case Studies

Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
Post-Operative DVT/PE

Slide 18

AHRQ Validation Study:
Summary of PPVs
Preliminary estimates (2007)

Slide 19

AHRQ Validation Study:
Iatrogenic Pneumothorax and Outcomes (N=154)*

*Check all that apply.

Slide 20

NMH Assessment of Clinical Practice
Iatrogenic Pneumothorax

Question: Was the condition preventable?
Variables Reviewed for Trends:

• Procedure resulting in pneumothorax (PTX)
  
  • Type
  • Location
  • Physician/Service (no identifiable trend)
  • Day of the week (no identifiable trend)
  • Time of day (no identifiable trend)
• Patient factors
  • Reason for admission
  • Age (no identifiable trend)
  • Pulmonary comorbidity (no identifiable trend)

Slide 21

Procedure Resulting in PTX

Insufficient documentation: 24%
Thoracentesis: 21%
Lung surgery: 15%
Central line placement: 9%
Chest tube removal: 9%
Back surgery: 3%
Biliary drain placement: 3%
Bronchoscopy/biopsy: 3%
Diaphragm resection: 3%
Expected pleural laceration: 3%
Lung biopsy: 3%
Pacemaker insertion: 3%

Type and Frequency of Procedure Resulting in PTX, N=33
Dincer HE, Lipchik RJ. The intricacies of pneumothorax: management depends on accurate classification.
Postgraduate Medicine, Dec 2005.
 

Slide 22

Pneumothorax Interventions

• Focus on potentially preventable PTX in thoracentesis, pacemaker, and central line procedures
• Weekly case review by patient safety professional, MD
• Focus: Central Line and Pacemaker placement (clinical)
  • Refreshers, simulation training (central lines), supervision
• Focus: Correctly capturing exclusions (coding)
• Outcome: Rate has fallen from 1/week (3-4x expected) to 1-2/month (~expected)

Slide 23

Interventions to Reduce Complications

Slide 24

Post-Operative Venous Thrombosis / PE

In 2007 and 2008(Q1-Q3), approximately 17.3 patients per 1000 discharges*.experienced a DVT or PE complication at NMH.
*excludes OB Product line
Source: UHC Clinical Database
 

Slide 25

New VTE Prophylaxis Protocol - Electronic Medical Record Screenshot
 

Slide 26

Hospital DVT/PE Rates

Source: EPSI Coded Diagnosis Data
Excludes patients with DVT/PE Present on Admission
Bleeding Data represents patients that had a bleeding complication due to an anticoagulant
Protocol Implemented
 

Slide 27

Definition Case Study

Post-Operative Hemorrhage / Hematoma

Slide 28

Observed and Expected Post-Op Bleed Rates
with and without Transplant - Calendar 2008

Slide 29

Observed Post-Op Bleed Rates
with and without Transplant - Calendar 2008

In organizations that performed more then 300 Transplants 60% of the Organizations were in the worst 3rd for Observed Rates
When we exclude transplant from the Post Operative Hemorrhage and Hematoma metric, all but 2 organizations saw a rate improvement ranging from 0.19 to 4.28
 

Slide 30

Conclusions / Next Steps

Slide 31

Transparency,
Accountability

Slide 32

Conclusions: The Framework Works

• Coding
• Definition
• Clinical Opportunity
• Results:
  • Improved quality
  • Reduced harm
  • Reduced cost
  • Improved learning

   

Slide 33

Cynthia Barnard Director, Quality Strategies

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Research Assistant Professor

Institute for Healthcare Studies

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

676 St Clair #700

Chicago IL 60611

voice 312.926.4822

fax 312.926.8734

cbarnard@nmh.org