Targeting Prevention to Evidence Based, High Impact Interventions in M Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2009 conference On September 14, 2009, George Isham made this presentation at the 2009 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (615 KB) (Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Targeting Prevention to Evidence Based, High Impact Interventions in MedicareGeorge Isham, M.D., M.S.Chief Health OfficerAHRQ Annual ConferenceBethesda, MD.September 14, 2009Slide 2Is There Enough Time for Prevention?54.9% of Adults are receiving recommended preventive care*To fully satisfy all services recommended by the USPSTF, 1773 hours of a physician's annual time, or 7.4 hours per working day, is needed for the provision of preventive care services by primary care physicians ***McGlynn, et al, NEJM, 348:26. June 26, 2003 ** Yarnall KSH, et al, AJPH. Vol. 93. No.4., April, 2003Slide 3National Priorities Partnership28 multi-stakeholder organizationsConsumersPurchasersQuality alliancesHealth professionals/providersPublic sector: CMS, NGA, CDC, AHRQ, NIHAccreditation/certification groupsHealth plansCo-Chairs:Donald BerwickInstitute for Healthcare ImprovementMargaret O'Kane National Committee for Quality AssuranceNational Priorities PartnershipSlide 4Selecting the Priorities: CriteriaHigh Impact AreasReduce Disease BurdenEliminate HarmRemove WasteEradicate DisparitiesSlide 5National PrioritiesHigh Impact AreasPatient and family engagementPopulation healthSafetyCare coordinationPalliative careOveruseSlide 6NATIONAL PRIORITY Population healthImprove the health of the population3 Areas of focus: Preventive careHealthy lifestyle behaviorsCommunity index to assess health statusSlide 7Underuse of Preventive Services is a Big ProblemThe first of the NPP Population Health Goals is that all Americans will receive the most effective preventive services recommended by the USPSTFSlide 8A Strategy for Promoting the Most Effective Preventive ServicesStratify the USPSTF A & B recommendations by Clinical Preventive Burden and Cost Effectiveness *Maciosek, M.V., et. al., 2006. Priorities Among Effective Clinical Preventive Services, AJPM; (31): 52-61.Develop a Clinical Practice Guideline that incorporates those most impactful recommendations. ** (must do, nice to do, discuss, don't do.Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement Adult Preventive Services Guideline accessed at icsi.orgDevelop systems (decision support, standardized work flows, team assignments, etc) to support the implementation of the guidelineSlide 9A Strategy for Promoting the Most Effective Preventive ServicesDeploy an "all or none" measure that measures preventive services up to date by age and gender to monitor performance against the guideline*Deploy educational materials for patients designed to reinforce the prevention expectations of patients that are consistent with the most impactful recommendations by age and gender.*Nolan T. and Berwick DM, JAMA. 295:10. March 2006.Slide 102006 Prevention PrioritiesShort NameCPBCETotalAspirin Chemoprophylaxis— 'high risk'5510Childhood Vaccination Series5510Tobacco Cessation Counseling5510Colorectal Cancer Screening448Hypertension Screening538Influenza Immunization - adults448Pneumococcal Immunization - adults358Problem Drinking Screening & Brief Counseling448Vision Screening - adults358Cervical Cancer Screening437Cholesterol Screening527Breast Cancer Screening426Slide 11ICSI Adult Preventive Services Guideline - 2005Two images are shown one is Level I, Preventive services that providers and care systems must deliver (based on best evidence). The second, Level II, Preventive services that providers and care systems should deliver (based on goof evidence).Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, MN, 2005. icsi.orgSlide 12ICSI Adult Preventive Services Guideline - 2005Two images are shown one is Level III, Preventive Services for which the evidence is currently incomplete, therefore left to the judgement of individual medical groups, clinicians and their patients. The second image is Level IV, Screening maneuvers that are not supported by evidence.Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, MN, 2005. icsi.orgSlide 13Examples of Measures Currently in the Field: HealthPartnersAdults - % members in sample who received all preventive screening appropriate to age & gender CholesterolColon cancer screeningBreast cancer screeningCervical cancer screeningChlamydia screeningPneumococcal vaccineBlood pressureVision screeningMember up to date rate = 78.7%HealthPartners, Inc. 2008. Clinical Indicators Report.Slide 14Our Inability to Address Key Health Behaviors Leads to Premature MortalityFor example, for middle aged Americans, optimal evidence based treatment at the time of an acute cardiac event would prevent or postpone only 8% of deaths. By comparison, 47% of deaths in this group could be prevented or postponed if everyone met dietary and activity guidelines and did not smoke *Therefore, the second of the NPP population health goals is that all Americans will adopt the most important healthy lifestyle behaviors known to promote health. (nutrition, activity, tobacco use, healthy alcohol use)* Kottke T, et al, AJPM. 2009; 36(1): 82-8Slide 15Actual Causes of Death: 1990 and 2000 Illicit Drug useSexual behaviorFirearmsMotor vehicleToxic agentsMicrobial agentsAlcoholPoor diet and physical inactivityTobacco19901121345141920000.70.81.21.82.33.13.516.618.1Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. JAMA. Mar 10 2004;291(10):1238-1245.Slide 16We Have no Standard Metric to help our Communities be HealthierWhat gets measured gets done10 most important determinants of health do not include access to health care - Marmot"The nations heavy investment in the personal health system is a limited future strategy for promoting health" IOM Future of the Public's Health"The pathways to better health do not generally depend on better health care" - Schroeder, NEJMTherefore, the third of the NPP population health goals is that The health of American communities will be improved according to a national index of healthSlide 17Strategies for Improving Community HealthWe will develop a national health index that addresses not only the contribution of healthcare to good health, but also the health behaviors of individuals and the socioeconomic and physical environment factors that affect health.We will calculate and report the index for all counties in the United StatesSlide 18Examples of Types of Overuse (Waste)An preventive service could be harmful or ineffective - USPSTF D list.The American Public is being defrauded and doesn't know it.An effective intervention could be deployed inefficiently in the target population. (Cervical Cancer Screening Example - Next Slide)Slide 19An effective intervention could be deployed inefficiently in the target population. No Pap>=2 PAP/3 yrs>=65 yrs1 pap in 3 yrs# of Women8552225491333310616# of Paps056138511210616Slide 20Some Questions -Is a single preventive visit the most effective strategy to address preventive services in Medicare?How will it integrate with our sophisticated IT strategies?Is addressing waste and overuse in preventive services in Medicare an opportunity to contribute to a more affordable Medicare benefit?Slide 21ConclusionsNew policies for Medicare based on A and B recommendations of the USPSTF move in the right direction.There remain significant opportunities to encourage the adoption of state of the art approaches to maximize the value and impact of preventive services for Medicare Beneficiaries. Current as of December 2009 Internet Citation: Targeting Prevention to Evidence Based, High Impact Interventions in M. December 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2009/isham/index.html