Advising the Nation. Improving Health (Text Version)

On September 19, 2009, David R. Nerenz made this presentation at the 2009 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (3.7 MB) (Plugin Software Help).

Slide 1

Advising the Nation. Improving Health.

Subcommittee on Standardized Collection of Race/Ethnicity Data for Healthcare Quality Improvement

Presentation to AHRQ Annual Conference

September 15, 2009
 

Slide 2

IOM Report, 2003: "Unequal Treatment"

"Disparities in the health care delivered to racial and ethnic minorities are real and are associated with worse outcomes in many cases, which is unacceptable."
—Alan Nelson, retired physician, former president of the American Medical Association

Slide 3

Subcommittee Charge

• Report on the issue of standardization of race, ethnicity, and language variables
• Define a standard set of race, ethnicity, and language categories, and methods of obtaining these data

Slide 4

Key Messages

• Health care organizations must have data on the race, ethnicity, and language of those they serve in order to identify disparities and to provide high quality care.
• Detailed "granular ethnicity" and "language need" data, in addition to the OMB categories, can inform point of care services and resources and assist in improving overall quality and reducing disparities.

Slide 5

The Case for Collection of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data

• Race, ethnicity, and language data are needed to:
  • Stratify quality performance metrics
  • Organize quality improvement and disparity reduction initiatives
  • Track progress over time, locally and as a nation

Slide 6

The Case for Standardization

• Standardized race, ethnicity, and language data are needed to:
  • Support comparison of data on disparities across organizations and regions, and over time
  • Support combination of data across organizations or regions to create pooled data sets
  • Support reporting of, and replication of, successful disparity-reduction initiatives

Slide 7

Existing Guidance

• OMB Directive—1997
  • Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity
  • 5 Race Categories
• Progress has been made in incorporating the OMB categories into many data collection activities—not all are aligned
• The OMB categories are insufficient to illuminate many disparities and to target QI efforts efficiently

Slide 8

The Rationale for Granular Ethnicity Data

• Disparities exist within the OMB categories
  • Differential pap screening rates among Asian subgroups even when insured
  • Higher rates of childhood asthma and recent attacks among Puerto Rican than Mexican ethnic groups
• It is still important to use OMB race and Hispanic ethnicity categories

Slide 9

Granular Ethnicity—Mammography

A graph depicting Granular Ethnicity Mammography with the center of the graph highlighted.

Source: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Health Policy Research, California Health Interview Survey

Slide 10

Access to Care—Granular Ethnicity Among Hispanic Groups

Slide 11

Variation in Breastfeeding Rates by Asian Ethnicity\

<colgroup><colgroup> 

Source: Asian Births in Massachusetts: 1996-1999; Hispanic Births in Massachusetts: 1996-1999; and Black Births in Massachusetts: 1997-2000

Slide 12

Definition of Granular Ethnicity

• Ancestry, which the Census Bureau defines as "a person's ethnic origin or descent, 'roots,' or heritage, or the place of birth of the person or the person's parents or ancestors before their arrival in the United States" is the ethnicity concept adopted by the subcommittee as the level of detail necessary for quality improvement.

Slide 13

Recommendation: Granular Ethnicity

• Collect granular ethnicity data as a separate variable from the OMB race and Hispanic ethnicity categories
• Granular ethnicity categories should be selected from a national standard list
• Lists should include an "Other, please specify:__" option for additional self-identification

Slide 14

Selecting Locally Relevant Granular Ethnicity Categories

• Local circumstances can dictate whether an entity uses 10 or 100 categories from the national standard list; criteria for selection:
  • Health and health care quality issues
  • Evidence or likelihood of disparities
  • Size of subgroups within the population
  • Analyses of relevant data on the service or study population

Slide 15

The CDC/HL7 code set is hierarchical; each ethnicity category rolls up to an OMB race or Hispanic ethnicity. But not all ethnicities have corresponding races.

With some degree of certainty, Nigerians can be categorized as Black. But not everyone from Madagascar is Asian. So rolling up as Madagascans to Asian misclassifies Africans of Madagascan descent.

Slide 16

Recommendation: Further Study

• HHS should pursue studies on different ways of framing the questions and response categories at the level of the OMB standards
• Studies could also monitor implementation of granular ethnicity data collection
• HHS studies and Census testing may raise the need for an OMB review

Slide 17

Rationale for Language Need Data

• Persons with limited English proficiency are at risk for:
  • Decreased access to care and having a usual source of care
  • Adverse outcomes from medical errors and drug complications
  • Less utilization of preventive care services

Slide 18

Recommendation: Language Need

• Identify language need by determining:
  • how well an individual believes he/she speaks English
  • what language he/she needs for a health-related encounter
• "Less than very well" is defined as LEP
• Where possible, also could collect language spoken at home and language preferred for written materials

Slide 19

Recommended variables for standardized collection of race, ethnicity, and language need

OMB Hispanic Ethnicity

• Hispanic or Latino
• Not Hispanic or Latino

OMB Race

• Black or African American
• White
• Asian
• American Indian or Alaska Native
• Native Hawaiian or Other
• Some other race

Granular Ethnicity

• Locally relevant choices from a national standard list of approximately 540 categories with CDC/HL7 code
• 'Other please specify:_____' response option
• Rollup to the CMB categories

Spoken the English Language

• Very well
• Well
• Not Well
• Not at all

(Limited English proficiency is defined as "less than very well")

Spoken Language Preferred for Health Care

• Locally relevant choices from a national standard list of approximately 600 categories with coding to be determined
• 'Other please specify:_____' response option
• Inclusion of sign language in spoken language needs list and Braille when written language is elicited

Slide 20

Improving Data Collection

• Self-report is the preferred method
• Educating patients, communities, and health care organization leadership and staff on need for and use of data
• Recommendation: Use indirect estimation where self-report is not available or adequate

Slide 21

Improving Data Exchange

• Building information infrastructure to ideally enable integrated exchange within and among organizations so these data will not need to be repeatedly collected
• Ensuring privacy and data stewardship

Slide 22

Recommendation: EHR Standards

• ONC EHR standards should include variables for:
  • Race
  • Hispanic ethnicity
  • Granular ethnicity
  • English proficiency
  • Preferred spoken language

Slide 23

Recommendation: Payment Incentives

• When payment incentives in HIT programs are used, the collection of race, ethnicity, and language data should be an activity for which positive incentives are offered

Slide 24

Recommendation: HHS Avenues to Ensure Collection

• Recipients of HHS health care-related funding should include the recommended variables in data collection
• HHS, VA, and DOD should adopt the subcommittee's standards so that all federally funded health data systems have comparable data

Slide 25

Recommendation: Other Avenues of Ensuring Collection

• Accreditation and standard setting organizations should include these variables in accreditation standards and performance measure endorsements
• States should require the collection of these variables

Slide 26

www.iom.edu/datastandardization/


Questions?

Comments?