Building National Health Care Quality Improvement Campaigns to Succeed: Lessons from the CUSP: CLABSI Project Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2010 conference. On September 27, 2010, Stephen Hines made this presentation at the 2010 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (715 KB). Free PowerPoint® Viewer (Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Building National Health Care Quality Improvement Campaigns to Succeed: Lessons from the CUSP: CLABSI ProjectAHRQ Annual MeetingSept. 27, 2010Steve Hines, PhDHealth Research and Educational TrustSlide 2Presentation OverviewCUSP: CLABSI Project Origins and Background.The Challenge of Evolving a National Project.Implications for Project Design and Planning.Final Thoughts.Slide 3Project Origins and BackgroundIn the beginning was the Keystone Project......and it was very good!An image of a painting and the map of Michigan is shown.Slide 4CUSP: CLABSI Project RationaleBlood stream infections kill 40,000-60,000 persons each year.Reducing the BSI rate from 5 per 1,000 days to 1 per 1,000 days will save 20,000 lives annually.Michigan Keystone Project showed that this level of reduced CLABSI rate was achievable and sustainable.Project made central part of Secretary Sibelius' Healthcare Acquired Infection Reduction Initiative.Slide 5CUSP: CLABSI Project GoalsOutcome Goals: Reduce BSIs to 1 per 1,000 central line days.Some states and hospitals view CLABSI elimination as the goal.Improve unit safety culture.Reach hospitals in all 50 states, the District and Puerto Rico.Include both ICUs and other units with CLABSI risks.Include critical access hospitals.Slide 6CUSP: CLABSI Implementation ContentCUSPEducate on the science of safety.Identify defects.Assign executive to adopt unit.Learn from defects.Implement teamwork and communication tools.CLASBIWash hands prior to procedure.Use maximal barrier precautions.Clean skin with chlorhexidine.Avoid femoral lines.Remove unnecessary lines.Slide 7CUSP CLABSI Intervention ProcessesIndividual Components.Planning/ orientation calls.Baseline data collection period for CLABSI and safety culture.Kickoff meeting.Monthly infection rate and team process data submission.Monthly content calls.Monthly coaching calls.Monthly feedback reports on outcome and process measures.Mid-course meeting.End-of-project meeting.Project spans two years and requires participation in:2-3 in-person meetings.48-60 calls led by national project team.24 internal meetings of implementation team.Monthly data collection, submission, and assessment (lessons learned/root cause analysis).Slide 8The Challenge of Evolving a National QI ProjectSlide 9A Tale of Two Airplanes Wright FlyerP-51 MustangDesign & Build Prototype4 years117 daysProduction Time6 months for Flyer II & III21 minutes at peakRange24 miles1,100+ milesSpeed39 mph400+ mphAltitude200 feet30,000+ feetImages: A Wright Flyer plane and a P-51 Mustang plane are shown.Slide 10Obstacles to EvolvingProven initial model: Change distances project from proof method will work.Project databases: Stability justifies creating and building a robust national database.Evaluation: Simpler and cleaner to assess outcome of a single intervention.Project planning: Proposal submission process requires plan easier to execute than to modify.Budgets/Contracts: Executed agreements with subcontractors commit resources for specific tasks.Clarity: Change creates questions and confusion.Slide 11Lessons from Two AirplanesChange is difficult, risky, but absolutely essential for mass production (or a national rollout to succeed).Images: A Wright Flyer plane and a P-51 Mustang plane are shown.Slide 12Predictable Evolutions in National QI CampaignsKey challenge shifts from obtaining proof change is possible to achieving change in specific units.Baseline problem level changes from 5 infections per 1,000 central line days to 2-3 infections per 1,000 central line days.Goal changes from under 1 infection per 1,000 central line days to total elimination.Slide 13Predictable Evolutions in National QI CampaignsParticipant expectations change from uncertainty of success despite effort to (over)confidence in success with minimal effort.Participants change from innovators and early adopters to mid- to late-majority hospitals.External environment changes from project as unique and innovative to project as one of many improvement activities in the area.Slide 14National QI Campaign ParadoxesThe more successfully a national QI campaign begins, the more pressure there will be for it to remain unchanged and the more need it will have to evolve quickly and substantially.Nothing guarantees failure more than continued, unreflective reliance on the processes that first produced success.Slide 15Preparing to Successfully Adapt to ChangeFactors EvolvingFromToChallenge DefinitionCreating evidence improvement is possiblePractical guidance on achieving improvement Proof rates can be loweredProof decreases are sustainableBaseline Defect RateRecognition of a significant problemErroneous belief the problem is fixed 3-4 Sigma improvement strategies5 Sigma improvement strategiesSlide 16Preparing to Successfully Adapt to ChangeFactors EvolvingFromToProject GoalsSignificant reductionComplete eradication Achieving superior performanceAvoiding inferior, substandard careParticipant expectationsChange is doubtful, long, and hardChange should be fast and simple Comprehensive and redundant trainingEfficient, streamlined training Dependence on project leadership for successDependence on internal and local leadership for successSlide 17Preparing to Successfully Adapt to ChangeFactors EvolvingFromToParticipantsInnovators and early adoptersMid and late majority and laggards Proof from national experts and visionariesProof from local and regional leadersExternal EnvironmentProject is unique, exciting, and cutting edgeProject is one route to success among many Few implementation activities have occurredPartial interventions have occurred in many places Coordination with alternate projects irrelevantCoordination with alternate projects essential Belief problem is unfixable independentlyBelief problem can be fixed without external helpSlide 18Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding OrganizationsProposal Evaluation.Budgeting.Goal Setting.Project Leadership.Operational Processes.Data Bases.Evaluation.Slide 19Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding Organizations: Key QuestionsProject DimensionFromToProposal Writing & EvaluationIs it a viable, proven plan?What is the plan for adapting to inevitable change?BudgetingAre all resources allocated to good causes?Are resources fungible and are unallocated resources retained to support needed adjustments?Goal SettingWhat outcome goals are set at the outset?Are change goals defined and outcome goals adjusted?Slide 20Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding Organizations: Key QuestionsProject DimensionFromToProject LeadershipDoes project have stable, credible leadership?Does project have a plan to develop and transition to new, local or regional leaders?Operational ProcessesAre processes well defined and proven?How will processes become faster and more efficient?Data basesWill stable, robust databases be created?Can databases inexpensively evolve to reflect needed changes?EvaluationWere processes followed and outcomes achieved?Did processes evolve to achieve outcomes more efficiently?Slide 21Final ThoughtsCritical to distinguish between essential success factors and processes for helping hospitals implement them. Success factors for CUSP: CLABSI Culture change that makes safety a priority and empowers every employee to hold every other employee accountable for safety.Operational changes that reduce infections.Processes likely to morph: Set of meetings and calls used to educate, motivate, and empower unit staff to implement CUSP: CLABSI.Slide 22Final ThoughtsCritical to recognize inherent tensions in national campaigns: Consistency & clarity vs. need to change.Strong national leadership vs. flexible local leadership.Design that supports strong, clean evaluation of impact vs. design that maximizes operational impact.Processes likely to morph: Set of meetings and calls used to educate, motivate, and empower unit staff to implement CUSP: CLABSI.More research and reflection required on how to make national campaigns successful and efficient (e.g. Scale Up & Spread Conference funded by AHRQ, Commonwealth Fund & others.Slide 23Final ThoughtsNeed to account for context in planning and executing a campaign: Inevitable that parts of campaign will not take place in ideal context. Could be ideal when funded, less enthusiasm during implementation.Could be ideal at kickoff, but requires visionary funder that correctly times the trend.Need strategies for both directly influencing participants and for shaping the national environment to support campaign's goals.Slide 24QuestionsAbout presentation: Steve HinesSHINES3@AHA.ORG312-422-2607About participating in CUSP: CAUTI or CUSP:CLABSI DBOHR@AHA.ORG646-678-4280Disclaimer: Although the CUSP: CLABSI project is funded by AHRQ and is being led by a partnership that includes Johns Hopkins University and the Michigan Health and Hospital Association, the opinions in this presentation are exclusively those of the presenter. Like an effective national campaign, these views are also likely to evolve over time. Current as of December 2010 Internet Citation: Building National Health Care Quality Improvement Campaigns to Succeed: Lessons from the CUSP: CLABSI Project. December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2010/hines/index.html