Value of Information: An Innovative Approach to Prioritizing Comparative Effectiveness Research Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2010 conference. On September 29, 2010, Ava John-Baptiste made this presentation at the 2010 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (750 KB). Free PowerPoint® Viewer (Plugin Software Help).Slide 1Value of Information: An innovative approach to prioritizing comparative effectiveness researchAHRQ Annual MeetingSeptember 29, 2010Slide 2Organizers & PresentersWilliam Lawrence, MD, MSJoanna E. Siegel, RN, SM, SDAva John-Baptiste, PhDDavid O. Meltzer, MD, PhDGillian D. Sanders, PhDSlide 3 Session OverviewThe promise and challenge of using value of information to inform comparative effectiveness research prioritiesAva John-Baptiste, PhDValue of Information Analysis to Inform Priorities for Health Research: Moving from Theory to PracticeDavid O. Meltzer, MD, PhDUsing Value of Information to Prioritize Future Research: A Case StudyGillian Sanders, PhDSlide 4Session GoalsOutline the theoretical basis of VOI.Describe use of VOI.Discuss barriers to applying VOI.Consider possible solutions.Present AHRQ funded VOI research.Slide 5ResearchCan improve health care decision making ... at a costSlide 6Prioritizing ResearchResearch topics: Span a variety of conditionsPertain to a variety of populations and subgroupsPrevention, diagnosis and treatmentDrugs, devices, procedures or strategiesSlide 7How can research funding organizations systematically target investments in research where the impact of reducing the uncertainties in decisions will have the greatest benefits?Slide 8TopicFor diabetic patients, what is the effectiveness of between visit patient outreach compared to standard patient care on adherence to therapy?Slide 9TopicWhat is the comparative effectiveness of typical and atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other disorders?Slide 10TopicWhat is the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass grafting for coronary artery disease?Slide 11AHRQ Priority Setting CriteriaAppropriatenessImportance: Disease burdenCostStakeholder supportUncertainty/controversyDesirability of new researchFeasibilityPotential valueSlide 12Value of InformationA measure of the value of acquiring more information to better inform a health care decision... based on an estimate of the foregone benefit of making the wrong decision.Slide 13Value of InformationHealth care decisions are uncertain.We choose what we believe is the best option.With more information we may choose a different option.Value of Information = p Wrong Decision x Expected Value Wrong DecisionSlide 14VOI ComponentsDecision with two or more options.A model relating the expected value of each option to uncertain parameters.A method of calculation.Slide 15Expected ValueModelParameters + Uncertainty leads to: Value of Information = Wrong Decision x Expected Value Wrong Decision Slide 16OpportunitiesEncourages structured decision makingPotential to increase transparencyCan quantify research benefits relative to: Potential to reduce uncertaintyImpact on decision makingCostSlide 17ChallengesComplex models are resource intensive.Simple models may exclude important elements of expected value.Estimating uncertainty can be difficult.Slide 18Questions?Comments? Current as of December 2010 Internet Citation: Value of Information: An Innovative Approach to Prioritizing Comparative Effectiveness Research. December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2010/johnbaptiste/index.html