Innovations in Transplantation (Text Version) Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual ConferenceSlide presentation from the AHRQ 2011 conference. Innovations in TransplantationSlide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual ConferenceOn September 19, 2011, Rolf Barth made this presentation at the 2011 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (10.3 MB). Plugin Software Help.Slide 1Innovations in Transplantation:Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy for Living-Donor Kidney TransplantationFace Transplantation: Preclinical and Clinical TrialsRolf N. Barth, M.D.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineAHRQ 2011 Annual ConferenceSeptember 19, 2011Slide 2Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy for Living-Donor Kidney TransplantationSlide 3Renal Transplantation as Therapy for End Stage Renal Disease 2000-2009Image: Line graph displays the following data:YearKidney WaitlistDeceased DonorLiving Donor200050,4265,9855,941200153,5606,0806,616200256,5206,1906,630200359,6886,4576,828200464,3107,1507,004200568,4297,5936,902200673,4698,0196,732200778,3378,0856,315200883,1127,9906,218200988,5038,0226,610 Slide 4Rationale for Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy ProgramAdvanced laparoscopic approach achieved with existing instrumentation and techniques.Improved cosmetic appearance.Potential for improved post-operative recovery.Motivate recipient/donor combinations.Encourage living kidney donation.Slide 5University of Maryland ExperiencePerformed 1300 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies.Preparation for single-port: Minimized ports on standard donor.Observed procedures.Animal lab.April 2009 initiated single-port donor nephrectomy as routine approach.Currently performed over 140 single-port donor nephrectomies.Slide 6Access DevicesSILS Port Device (Covidien).Gelport/Gelpoint Device (Applied Medical).Images: The SILS Port Device and Gelport/Gelpoint Device are shown.Slide 7Image: An operating room is shown.Slide 8Transumbilical Renal Extraction Minimizes Apparent Length of IncisionImages: Photographs of the incision site are shown.Slide 9BMI 30 HealingImages: Photographs of the incision site on Postoperative Day (POD) 0, POD 15, and POD 22 are shown.Slide 106 Months Post-OpImage: A photograph of the incision site 6 months after the surgery is shown.Slide 112 Years Post-OpImage: A photograph of the incision site 2 years after the surgery is shown.Slide 12Anatomical VariantsImages: Three variants are shown: 2 arteries, 2 arteries, and lumbar vein.Slide 13Single vs. Multi-portDonor DemographicsSILS (n=135)Multiport (n=100)pAge (yrs)44±1343±110.38Gender (F)73.1%71.0%0.40Race (Non AA)81.5%81.0%0.53BMI27±428±40.19Renal Arteries1.3±0.61.2±0.50.06Renal Veins1.0±0.21.0±0.20.88Lumbar Veins1.0±0.81.0±1.30.98 Donor Surgical OutcomesSILS (n=135)Multiport (n=100)pCross Clamp Time (hrs)2.8±0.72.6±0.50.12Estimated Blood loss (ml)77±64107±1220.019Length of stay (days)2.6±0.92.3±0.70.009 Recipient Renal FunctionSILS (n=135)Multiport (n=100)pRecipient Post TX eGFR 1 week59±1955±190.23Recipient Post TX eGFR 1 month60±1852±160.003 Slide 14Operative Time Learning CurveImage: A graph labeled Operative Time Learning Curve is shown.Slide 15SF=36 and Survey ResponsesDonor SF-36 ResultsSILS (n=52)Multiport (n=39)pPhysical Health (Composite)88.3±10.885.8±15.50.36Mental Health (Composite)85.1±14.184.3±14.10.78TOTAL SF36 Score88.8±12.187.1±14.10.54 Donor Pain LevelsSILS (n=52)Multiport (n=39)pNight of Surgery6.0±2.86.1±2.80.85Post Op 15.5±2.65.3±2.70.73Day of Discharge4.1±2.34.1±2.30.93Post Op 72.6±2.02.7±2.40.84Post Op 300.8±1.21.0±1.60.40Current0.0±0.10.2±0.70.10 Donor Satisfication ResultsSILS (n=52)Multiport (n=39)pDonation Decision9.9±0.59.4±1.90.07Financial Burden8.8±2.19.5±1.60.10Stress Level7.7±2.57.5±3.10.68Cosmetic Outcome9.2±1.77.4±2.9<0.0001Overall Process9.4±1.28.4±2.40.01 Donor Recovery PeriodSILS (n=52)Multiport (n=39)pWalked Without Difficulty2.4±1.32.6±1.30.52Ate a Normal Diet2.3±1.42.2±1.30.71Stopped Pain Medication2.9±1.22.7±1.30.46Resumed Driving4.0±1.04.0±0.90.92Resumed Normal Activities4.6±0.84.6±0.80.94Re-Hospitalized due to donation4.40%3.30%0.65 Slide 16ConclusionsSingle port donor nephrectromy is safe and may be accomplished in broad spectrum of donors with experienced team.Patients report improved satisfaction with cosmesis and donation process with single port compared to multiple port technique.No definite evidence regarding recovery time or pain.Further investigation of implications: Willingness of recipients to ask potential donors.Additional kidney donors to alleviate organ shortage.Slide 17Face Transplantation: Preclinical and Clinical TrialsSlide 18Incidence of Facial TraumaIncidence of facial injury among soldiers in Iraq=30% (Colonel Mark Bagg MD, ASRM, Arizona, January 2006).Incidence of facial injury at University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center= 15% (unreported data: ~ 7,000-10,000 admissions per year).Slide 19Images: Photographs of six patients with facial trauma are shown.Slide 20Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA) Composite tissue defined to elements of skin, muscle, bone.Applications include: Limb transplantation.Transplantation for soft tissue defects.Facial transplantation for devastating burn/blast injuries.Results are life-saving, limb-saving, allow for avoidance of permanent disability.Slide 21ExperimentalImage: Figures from Barth et al, Plast Reconstr Surg 123:493, 2009, captioned "Facial Subunit Composite Tissue Allografts in Nonhuman Primates: I. Technical and Immunosuppressive Requirements for Prolonged Graft Survival," are shown.Slide 22Prolonged Survival of Composite Facial Allografts in Non-Human Primates Associated with Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative DisorderImage: Photographs and 3 graphs are shown.Slide 23Vascularized Bone Marrow-Based Immunosuppresion Inhibits Rejection of Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman PrimatesImage: 3 graphs are shown.Slide 24Vascularized Bone Marrow-Based Immunosuppresion Inhibits Rejection of Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman PrimatesMRI of Vascularized Bone Marrow.Histology of Vascularized Bone Marrow.Images: Photographs Vascularized Bone Marrow are shown.Slide 25Facial CTA SummaryGroup NumberImmuno-suppressionBone & VBMMean FK506Level (± SD)Mean Survival(days)End PointChimerismDetectedAcute RejectionChronic RejectionNotch Pathway Expression1High FK506(n=6)Yes45 ± 21116PTLDNoNoNoNo2High FK506 à Rapamycin(n=3)Yes40 ± 2380RejectionNoYesNoNo3Low FK506/ MMF(n=4)Yes25 ± 13310RejectionYes (3/4)YesYesYes4Low FK506/ MMF(n=3)No25 ± 12112RejectionYes (1/3)YesNoNo5Low FK506/Anti-CD28(n= 3)Yes28 ± 12101RejectionNoYesNoNo Slide 26Non-Human Primate Model of Fibula Vascularized Composite Tissue Allotransplantation Demonstrates Donor-recipient Bony UnionImages: Illustrations and photographs of non-human primate bones.Slide 27Clinical CTA StrategiesCo-transplanted vascularized bone marrow may be permissive towards the development of prolonged graft survival.CTA were rejected at early timepoints without calcineurin-based immunosuppression.'Prope' tolerance or minimal immunosuppression are the most attainable goals for widespread application of clinical CTA.Slide 28Craniofacial Composite Tissue AllotransplantationImage: Timeline shows 3 phases from 2009 to 2012: research and preclinical model, clinical programs development, and active clinical center.Slide 29Minimizing Chronic ImmunosuppressionLymphocyte-depleting induction therapies: Lowest rates of acute cellular rejection.Steroid Avoidance or Weaning: Nearly all kidney, pancreas, and liver transplant patients have steroids eliminated between 3 and 21 days.Permissive of chronic therapy with 1 or 2 drugs.Future—costimulatory blockade reagents requiring once monthly treatment.Slide 30Immunosuppression InductionImages: Illustration of antibody and line graph of induction and graft survival are shown.Humanized CAMPATH Antibody (Alemtuzumab)CD4 T cells depleted 99.7% 2 wks, 85% at 1 year, 69% at 2 years, and 63% at 3 yearsTx Int 19 (2006): 885-892Slide 31CTA Immunosuppressive RegimenImage: Chart shows the immunosuppressive regimen from Day 0 onward. Prednisone is given until POD 21; Tacrolimus and MMF continue to the end of the chart.Slide 32Multi-Organ Recovery TeamImage: Chart shows the positions of the recovery team and equipment around the operating table. Current as of March 2012 Internet Citation: Innovations in Transplantation (Text Version): Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference. March 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2011/barth/index.html