Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes (Text Version) Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual ConferenceSlide presentation from the AHRQ 2011 conference. Registries for Evaluating Patient OutcomesSlide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual ConferenceOn September 19, 2011, Elise Berliner made this presentation at the 2011 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (750 KB). .Slide 1Registries for Evaluating Patient OutcomesElise Berliner, Ph.D.Director, Technology Assessment ProgramCenter for Outcomes and EvidenceSlide 2AgendaOverview of the Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR) Project: Elise Berliner, Ph.D., Task Order Officer.Updates to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: Quality Improvement Registries: Richard Gliklich, M.D., Senior Editor.Protection of Registry Data from Litigation and Other Confidentiality Concerns for Providers and Manufacturers: Jane Hyatt Thorpe, J.D., Lead Author.Developing the Registry of Patient Registries: Dan Levy, M.S., Chief Technology Officer, Outcome.Slide 3Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR) ProjectPrimary Objective: Engage stakeholders in the design and development of the RoPR.This project also includes 4 secondary objectives designed to support the efficient use of high-quality registries for clinical research: Funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.Covers 5 major tasks, to be completed between 2010 and 2013.Awarded to the Outcome DEcIDE Center.Slide 4RoPR Tasks 1 and 2Task 1: Develop the Registry of Patient Registries: Engage stakeholders in the design and development of the RoPR, a searchable central listing of patient registries in the U.S. that is compatible with ClinicalTrials.gov.Task 2: Outcome Measures Framework: Produce a framework for standardizing outcome measure definitions that may be used as a resource in various systems such as the RoPR.Slide 5RoPR Tasks 3 and 4Task 3: Archiving Expired Registries: Develop a white paper on the feasibility of and potential strategies for a voluntary data repository for expired registries.Final paper submitted in August 2011.Task 4: Third edition of "Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes": Expand the User's Guide to address 11 new topics and update existing chapters and case examples.Slide 6RoPR Task 5Task 5: Web-Based Collaborative Registries Forum: Develop a paper exploring whether a Web-based forum on registries would encourage useful discussion, sharing of best practices, and debate on new challenges.Slide 7Today's DiscussionToday's discussion will focus on: Updates to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes.Developing the RoPR.Current as of December 2011Internet Citation:Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference (Text Version). December 2011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/about/annualconf11/berliner_gliklich_hyatt_levy/berliner.htm Current as of March 2012 Internet Citation: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes (Text Version): Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference. March 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2011/berliner/index.html