Integrated Care Coordination Information System: Primary Care Redesign

Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference

Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2011 conference.

Integrated Care Coordination Information System: Primary Care Redesign through Care Coordination and Population Management

Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference


On September 19, 2011, David Dorr made this presentation at the 2011 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (3 MB). Plugin Software Help.


Slide 1

Text Description is below the image.

Integrated Care Coordination Information System: Primary Care Redesign through Care Coordination and Population Management

David A Dorr, MD MS
Associate Professor
Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology
General Internal Medicaine & Geriatrics OHSU

Funding for this research from The John A. Hartford Foundation, AHRQ, Intermountain HealthCare, and the National Library of Medicine.

More information at caremanagementplus.org.

Slide 2

Text Description is below the image.

Overview

  • Care Management Plus: International Conference on Cybernetics, Informatics and Systemics (ICCIS) need and trial.
  • Prioritized functions.
  • Unintended consequences.
  • Sustainability: Free take one vs. thoughtful partnership.

A.K.A—How to build a better system of care for your most at-risk primary care patients.

Slide 3

Text Description is below the image.

Image: A diagram shows the interaction between specialists, the primary care team, the caregiver, and the patient.

Slide 4

Text Description is below the image.

Needs assessment / Build system (1 year + )
Train clinics and care managers 

Randomly assigned goals for IT use.

Arm 1: Coordination of Care:

  • Complete assessment/care plan.
  • Education.
  • Goal setting and follow up.
  • Communication.
  • Motivation/coaching.
  • Completing CM services.

Arm 2: Quality:

  • Choose 5 of 20 quality measures: prevention, diabetes, vulnerable elderly, asthma, congestive hearth failure.

Data from ICCIS, Payers

.

Evaluation (Aim 4):

  • Outcomes (health/satisfaction) and their relationship to implementation and use of information technology (IT).

Slide 5

Text Description is below the image.

Needs assessment

Additional Care Management elements requested from 7 teams with EHRs.

Slide 6

Text Description is below the image.

ICCIS Care Coordination Workflow

A centralized reminder list of tasks and communications that were proactively planned but incomplete allows population-based tasks to be merged with individual encounter tasks.

Image: Care Manager Encounter Tickler List.

Slide 7

Text Description is below the image.

Quality measure dashboard

Image: The Quality measure dashboard is shown.

Dashboard can be run by clinic, team, or individual PCP.

 

Slide 8

Text Description is below the image.

ICCIS Interactive Quality Reports

Image: ICCIS Interactive Quality Reports are shown.

The abilities to document exclusions at multiple levels and generate targeted population-based review cycles avoid the problems caused by static quality reports and allow providers to efficiently focus outreach efforts on high risk populations.

Slide 9

Text Description is below the image.

Patient Worksheet

Image: Patient Worksheet is shown.

When working with persons with multiple illnesses or complex illness, a clinical summary that captures a core set of information improves patient outcomes (1). Care coordination and behavioral modification (goal setting) elements often require special effort and the quality summary requires more advanced monitoring and implementation than most standard EHRs provide.

(1)Wilcox, Proc of AMIA Symp, 2005

Slide 10

Text Description is below the image.

It worked! (see our poster)

Image: Table 1. Care coordination activities is shown.

Figure 3: Absolute adherence change for Arms and Clinics Arms reimbursed Table 1. Care coordination activities

Slide 11

Text Description is below the image.

Unintended consequences: Errors / fixes

  • 278 fixes of systemic errors in first 6 months of study.
  • Sources:
    • data (multiple EHRs, minimal standards).
    • workflow/usability.
    • Understanding/naming to reduce confusion.

Slide 12

Text Description is below the image.

Sustainability—'Free, take one'—dissemination to 208 teams

Image: A map of the United States shows the locations of the teams.

Slide 13

Text Description is below the image.

Sustainability: Thoughtful partnership

  • Readiness assessment: define benefit up front:
    • e.g., Medical Home care coordination; ACO reduction in hospitalizations and shared savings.
  • Partner on achievement of goals.
  • Share savings or benefit together:
    • Example: intensive care management demonstrations; SNP plans

Slide 14

Text Description is below the image.

  • Oregon Health & Science University:
    • David Dorr, PI.
    • Kelli Radican.
    • Susan Butterworth.
    • Nima Behkami.
    • Marsha Pierre-Jacques Williams.
    • Gwenivere Olsen.
    • Molly King.
    • Kristin Dahlgren.
  • Columbia University:
    • Adam Wilcox.
  • Intermountain Healthcare:
    • Cherie Brunker, Co-PI(UU).
    • Liza Widmeir.
    • Mary Carpenter.
    • Bryan Gardner.
    • Ann Larson.
  • Advisory Board:
    • K. John McConnel.
    • Tom Bodenheimer.
    • Eric Coleman.
    • Cheryl Schraeder.
    • Heather young.
    • Steven Counsel.
    • Larry Caslino.

Slide 15

Text Description is below the image.

Thank you & Main lessons

Topic

Tool

Assessment

Workflow

Tickler as CDSS and single workflow

Needs assessment and requirements; usability

Patient-centered Care

Patient  Worksheet

Accuracy, usefulness from clinical staff

Unintended consequences

Error tracking with clinical consequences

Fixes needed

Sustainability

"Free, take one" v.
Thoughtful partnership

Need has to be clearly assessed and targeted

 

dorrd@ohsu.edu
www.caremanagementplus.org

Slide 16

Text Description is below the image.

Thank you!

  • dorrd@ohsu.edu.
  • www.caremanagementplus.org.

Slide 17

Text Description is below the image.

Sticky problems

Problem

Explanation

ICCIS Result

Data in many different EHRs

EHRs have different data structures

Extracted data from 4 different EHRs

Functions in HIT systems siloed

Many functions are in separate EHR settings

Create universal workflows in separate application

EHRs have variable standard implementations

Although a standard vocabulary is available, it isn’t used

NOT EASY—manual mappings, many errors until it is solved

Population management is an analytic, not transactional issue

Reports take a long time to run and are static

Create interactive views of the reports (e.g., quality measure performance) with associated tables

 

Slide 18

Text Description is below the image.

Usability

Image: Flow chart shows the following steps:

Log metrics: click throughs (<5 seconds on page): 62% ; loops/ repeated actions
Interviews: Use / workflow / challenges / errors

Current as of December 2011


Internet Citation:

Integrated Care Coordination Information System: Primary Care Redesign through Care Coordination and Population Management. Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference (Text Version). December 2011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/about/annualconf11/brown_dalal_dorr_mertens/dorr.htm


Current as of March 2012
Internet Citation: Integrated Care Coordination Information System: Primary Care Redesign: Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference. March 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2011/dorr/index.html