Extending the Search for High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) in Healthcare Organizations Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference On September 19, 2011, Ann Scheck McAlearney made this presentation at the 2011 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (2.2 MB). Plugin Software Help.Slide 1Extending the Search for High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) in Healthcare OrganizationsSlide 2Investigating the Role of HPWPs in Reducing and Preventing Healthcare-Associated InfectionsPresenter: Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sc.D.Associate Professor, Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State UniversityAssociate Professor, Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State UniversityAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityAnnual Meeting, September 2011Slide 3Research Team Members and CollaboratorsOhio State UniversityAnn Scheck McAlearney, ScD, Associate Professor, Health Services Management and Policy (HSMP).Julie Robbins, MHA, Doctoral Student, HSMP.Rush University Medical CenterAndrew Garman, PsyD, Associate Professor and Associate Chair, Dept. of Health Systems Management.Health Research and Educational Trust/AHA Stephen Hines, PhD, Vice President for Research.Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityMichael Harrison, PhD, Sr. Social Scientist, Organizations & Systems.Slide 4Research OverviewAn image of 4 doctors is shown.Slide 5Rationale for StudyEvidence of lower quality of care, lapses in patient safety.Central to delivery of high-quality patient care is presence of capable workforce.Growing support for link between staffing patterns and patient outcomes.Slide 6Findings from First StudyInnovative HR practices, also known as high-performance work practices (HPWPs) may represent an important but underutilized strategy to improve health care systems (Garman, et. al. 2010).Evidence-based model for HPWP in healthcare organizations confirmed through exploratory case studies (McAlearney, et al. 2010): HPWP model evident in "exemplar organizations.Link to outcomes not direct, but widely accepted.Slide 7New Research Questions Focused on HAI InterventionsDo HPWPs facilitate the adoption and consistent application of practices known to reduce or prevent HAIs? In what ways?What distinguishes healthcare organizations that are more successful in adopting evidence-based practices in HAI reduction efforts from those organizations with less effective efforts?What contributes to sustainability for successful HAI reduction efforts? How are HPWPs involved in efforts to sustain HAI reduction efforts?Slide 8Methods: Case Study ApproachSlide 9Site Selection CriteriaFocus on CLABSI reduction efforts in hospital ICUs: To maximize variation, focus on "extreme" cases—i.e., sites with more vs. less successful efforts at reducing/sustaining reductions in CLABSI rates.Selection of four CUSP states from which to select case study "pairs" (from cohort 1).Hospital "pairs" selected based on: Participation in the same state collaborative.Differential outcomes in terms of CLABSI-reduction (during CUSP) (i.e., better vs. worse outcomes).Similar organizational characteristics (i.e., size, teaching, urban/ rural).Slide 10Site Visit ProcessNine study site visits.Semi-structured interviews held with key informants.Rigorous analysis of interview data.Organizational documents collected and reviewed, as appropriate (e.g., CUSP information, CLABSI protocols, QI and infection control documents, educational materials).Slide 11Key Informants InterviewedHospital-Level Informants: Infection Control (e.g., Epidemiologist, nurses).Organizational leaders (e.g., CEO, COO).Clinical leaders (e.g., CMO, CNO).Quality improvement professionals.Unit-Level Informants: ICU Nurses, Patient Care Coordinators, Physicians.ICU Nurse Managers, Directors, Physician Directors.Slide 12Current Status of Project4 site visits completed; 3 CUSP sites in 2 states: 2 "good," 1 "less good".114 key informant interviews completed: Executives (n=21): CEOs, CMOs, Nursing Leaders, Quality/ Safety.Managers (n=42): Nursing, Infection Control, IT, Quality/ Safety.Staff (n=51): Nurses, Physicians/ Residents, Infection Control, Project Management, Purchasing.5 additional site visits to be held.Slide 13Preliminary FindingsSlide 14Initial ObservationsConsistency in focus on CLABSI reduction: Insertion bundles/ procedures, sterile procedures, central line insertion carts.Maintenance, e.g., "scrub the hub," dressing changes."Back to Basics," e.g. hand hygiene, sterile technique.Identification of helpful products, e.g., end caps, Tru-D.Similar challenges: Reductions in ICU vs. hospital-wide.Data capture/reliability.Information systems limitations.Slide 15Emerging Themes: "Success Factors"Benchmark is getting to zero, not just peers.Strong leadership involvement and support: Commitment to quality improvement and CLABSI reduction at Executive/ Board level.Leaders willing to "back up" efforts with changes in policy, action (e.g., MDs who won't follow protocol).Support staff for "doing the right thing".Quality Improvement infrastructure: Dedicated staff/ resources to support/facilitate improvement efforts (e.g. data, root cause analyses).Slide 16Emerging Themes: "Success Factors" (continued)Accountability for results: CLABSI on scorecard, unit rates disseminated, variations explained, explored (e.g., root cause, PDSA).Rewards/recognition linked to improvement.Staff understand reason behind changes, success celebrated.Supportive organizational culture: Focus on systems, not individuals.Positive physician-nursing relationships.Multi-disciplinary focus, team effort (physicians, nurse, infection prevention, QI).Slide 17Emerging Themes: Challenges to OvercomeResource constraints: staff to support QI, additional nursing staff on units.Competing priorities: hard to maintain focus because so many things are "important".Changes in personnel: new physicians/staff can introduce variation in practice.Voluntary physician staff: less "control" over MDs.Shifting healthcare culture: collaboration, teams, system vs. individual failure.Slide 18Emerging Themes: Role of HPWPsHPWP SubsystemObserved practices that support CLABSI-preventionAligning LeadersIncentives for quality improvement/ CLABSI prevention clear, linked to results (e.g., performance evaluation, bonuses).Robust leadership education to support culture change, promote accountability, develop skills (e.g., coaching).Engaging StaffClear, widespread, routine communication about CLABSI prevention goals, changes in protocol, changes in rates.Policy/procedure changes linked to patient care goals.Success recognized and celebrated.Multi-channel communication with staff (e.g., bulletin boards, newsletters, E-mails).Communications campaign/ educational "blitz" to support major initiatives (e.g., hand hygiene, "scrub the hub," "blue to the sky".Staff involved when deficit occurs (e.g., root cause analysis).Slide 19Emerging Themes: Role of HPWPs IIHPWP SubsystemObserved practices that support CLABSI-preventionAcquiring and Developing TalentEmphasis on selecting the "right people" and giving them the tools they need to do the job.Part of broader organizational "talent" initiatives.Unit-based initiatives to ensure fit, quality of hires.Quality and safety emphasis in on-boarding.Empowering the FrontlineNurses empowered to stop procedures if sterile technique not being followed upon insertion; examples of other staff involvement (e.g., secretary empowered to enforce procedures).Staff involved in development of new protocols, selection of new products, performance initiatives.Slide 20Emerging Themes: Role of Collaborative/ CUSPConsiderable variation in participation/ awareness across sites (n=3 CUSP sites).Possible explanations: Protocols for CLABSI are well-established; many hospitals efforts to prevent CLABSIs may have been underway at CUSP onset (thus affecting participation).Smaller hospitals may be more likely to benefit because they have fewer resources to support quality improvement.Slide 21Next Steps...Slide 22What's Next?Complete site visits (by June, 2012).Analyze results (on-going).Disseminate and publish findings (2012).Slide 23Any Questions?Ann Scheck McAlearneymcalearney.1@osu.eduSlide 24Supplemental InformationSlide 25Organizational FactorsFactors influencing HPWP adoption:Senior leadership support.HR involvement with strategic planning.Capabilities of the implementers.Higher number of network affiliations.Financial condition / slack resources.Lower union density.Factors influencing HPWP impact & sustainabilityQuality of the local labor market.Financial condition.Continued leadership support.Slide 26Related PublicationsMcAlearney, A.S., Garman, A., Song, P, McHugh, M., Robbins, J., Harrison, M. 2011. "High-Performance Work Systems in Healthcare Management, Part 2: Qualitative Evidence from Five Case Studies." Health Care Management Review 36(3):214-226.Garman, A., McAlearney, A.S., Song, P., Harrison, M., McHugh, M. 2011. "High-Performance Work Systems in Healthcare Management, Part 1: Development of an Evidence-Informed Model." Health Care Management Review 36(3):201-213.Song, P, Robbins, J., Garman, A., McAlearney, A.S. 2011. "High-Performance Work Systems in Healthcare Management, Part 3: The Role of the Business Case for HPWP Investment in Health Care." Health Care Management Review. In press.McHugh M., Garman A., McAlearney A., Song P., and Harrison M. Using Workforce Practices to Drive Quality Improvement: A Guide for Hospitals. Health Research & Educational Trust, Chicago, IL. March 2010. Current as of March 2012 Internet Citation: Extending the Search for High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) in Healthcare Organizations. March 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2011/mcalearney/index.html