Chapter 5

Vision Rehabilitation: Care and Benefit Plan Models: Literature Review

Vision Rehabilitation: Care and Benefit Plan Models: Literature Review

References

1McNeil, JM. Americans with disabilities 1994-95. Current Population Reports P7061:3-6; August 1997.

2Verbrugge LM, Patrick DL. Seven chronic conditions: their impact on U.S. adults' activity levels and use of medical services. Am J Public Health 1995;85(2):173-82.

3Teilsch JM, Sommer A, Will K, Katz J, Royall RM. Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:286-90.

4U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 (conference edition; two volumes). Washington, DC; January 2000.

5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Surveillance, 1997. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.

6Dixon TP. Rehabilitation across the continuum: managing the challenges. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;115-19.

7Hoenig H, Nusbaum N, Brummel-Smith K. Geriatric rehabilitation: state of the art. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:1371-81.

8Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ 2000;320:1385-88.

9Hutton J, Persson J. Technology and disability. Assessment needs and potential. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11(2):135-43.

10Lishner DM, Richardson M, Levine P, Patrick D. Access to primary health care among persons with disabilities in rural areas: a summary of the literature. J Rural Health 1996;12(1):45-53.

11Chesnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, et al. Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. Evidence Report No. 2 (Prepared under Contract 290-97-0018 to Oregon Health Sciences University). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; February 1999.

12Carney N, du Coudray H, Davis-O'Reilly C, et al. Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents. Evidence Report No. 2, Supplement (Prepared under Contract 290-97-0018 to Oregon Health Sciences University). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; September 1999.

13Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomized trial of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ 1997;314:1151-59.

14Majid MJ, Lincoln NB, Weyman N. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits following stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

15Lincoln NB, Majid MJ, Weyman N. Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

16Greener J, Enderby P, Whurr R. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

17White MA, Johnstone AS. Recovery from stroke: does rehabilitation counseling have a role to play? Disabil Rehabil 2000;22(3):140-43.

18Jolliffe JA, Rees K, Taylor RS, Thompson D, Oldridge N, Ebrahim S. Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

19Crews JE. The evolution of public policies and services for older people who are visually impaired. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1287-1300). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

20Orr AL. Aging and blindness: toward a systems approach to service delivery. In Orr AL (Ed.). Vision and Aging: Crossroads for Service Delivery (pp. 3-31). New York: American Foundation for the Blind; 1992.

21American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred Practice Pattern. Rehabilitation: The management of adult patients with low vision. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1994.

22Bird B. Current issues and future directions. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1251-68). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

23Glaucoma Research Foundation. Available at www.glaucoma.org. Accessed Feb. 8, 2001.

24U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NEHEP Overview. Available at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/nehep/nehepov.htm

25U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH News Release. Glaucoma awareness month treatments that reduce side effects, help save vision. Released December 13, 2000. Available at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/news/pressreleases/121300.htm

26Yablonski MS. Functional orientation and mobility. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 855-67). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

27Watson GR. Functional assessment of low vision for activities of daily living. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 869-84). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

28The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Occupational therapy practice guidelines for adults with low vision. The AOTA Practice Guidelines Series; 1999.

29Higgins KE, Bailey IL. Visual disorders and performance of specific tasks requiring vision. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 1: Vision Impairment (pp. 287-315). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

30Goodrich GL. Overview and history of the field of vision rehabilitation: summary. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 779-783). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

31Evans JR. Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for age-related macular degeneration (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

32National Advisory Eye Council. Vision research: A national plan, 1999-2003. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health; 1999. Available at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/strategicplans/plan.htm

33Williams TF. Vision impairment in older adults. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1279-86). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

34Stuen C. Vision and aging: challenges for rehabilitation. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1301-13). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

35Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt JC, Martone JF, Royall RM, Witt KA, Ezrine S. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. NEJM 1991;325:1412-17.

36Rahmani B, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Gottsch J, Quigley H, Javitt J, Sommer A. The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1721-26.

37Crews JE, Campbell VA. Health conditions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions among older people reporting vision impairment. JVIB Forthcoming.

38Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

39Leonard R. Vision impairment in working-age adults. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1201-18). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

40Moore AA, Siu AL, Partridge JM, Hays RD, Adams J. A randomized trial of office-based screening for common problems in older persons. Am J Med 1997;102:371-78.

41Horowitz A, Balistreri E. Field-initiated Research to Evaluate Methods for the Identification and Treatment of Visually Impaired Nursing Home Residents. Final Report—Part II. Lighthouse International; 1994.

42Wolffe KE. Pathways to rehabilitation: Best practices. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (1237-50). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

43Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, Legro MW, Diener-West M, Bass EB, Damiano AM, Steinwachs DM, Sommer A. The VF-14: an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:630-38.

44Scott IU, Smiddy WE, Schifman J, Feuer WJ, Pappas CJ. Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low-vision services. Am J Ophthalmology 1999;128:54-62.

45Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116(11):1496-1504.

46Ross CK, Stelmack JA, Stelmack TR, Guihan M, Fraim M. Development and sensitivity to visual impairment of the Low Vision Functional Status Evaluation (LVFSE). Optom Vis Sci 1999 76(4):212-20.

47Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:793-802.

48De l'Aune WR, Williams MD, Welsh RL. Outcome assessment of the rehabilitation of the visually impaired. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36(4):273-93.

49De l'Aune WR. Outcome assessment of the rehabilitation of the visually impaired. VA RR&D C1776R and VA RR&D C1894R. Unpublished.

50Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. A weighted version of the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index: a measure of disability impact. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(8):565-79.

51Head DN, Babcock JL, Goodrich GL, Boyless JA. A geriatric assessment of functional status in vision rehabilitation. JVIB 2000, June. Available at: http://www.afb.org/jvib_toc.asp

52Barad MB. Functional assessment for transitions in patient acuity and care. Nur Clin North Am 1999;34(3):607-20.

53Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226-32.

54Long RG, Crews JE, Mancil R. Creating measures of rehabilitation outcomes for people who are visually impaired: The FIMBA project. J Visual Impairment and Blindness 2000;94(5):292-306.

55Mann WC, Karuza J, Hurren D, Tomita M. Needs of home-based older persons for assistive devices. Technology and Disability 1993;2(1):1-11.

56Rogers P, Orr AL. Current issues and future directions in the field of aging and vision. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1315-30). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

57Watson GR, De l'Aune W, Stelmack J, Maino J, Long S. National survey of the impact of low vision device use among veterans. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74(5):249-259.

58Park W. Vision rehabilitation for age-related macular degeneration. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1999;39(4):143-62.

59Rosenthal BP, Williams DR. Devices primarily for people with low vision. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 951-81). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

60Shuttleworth GN, Dunlop A, Collins JK, James Cr. How effective is an integrated approach to low vision rehabilitation? Br J Ophthalmology 1995;79:719-23.

61Rogow SM. Communication and language: issues and concerns. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 1: Vision Impairment (pp. 395-408). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

62Jansson G. Spatial orientation and mobility of people with vision impairments. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 1: Vision Impairment (pp. 359-75). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

63Beis J, Andre J, Baumgarten A, Challier B. Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:716.

64Scadden LA. Technology and society. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 907-19). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

65Vanderheiden GC. Impact of digital miniaturization and networked topologies on access to next generation telecommunication by people with visual disabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36(4):365-70.

66Brody BL, Williams RA, Thomas RG, Kaplan RM, Chu RM, Brown SI. Age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial of a self-management intervention. Ann Behav Med 1999;21(4):322-29.

67Conrod BE, Overbury O. The effectiveness of perceptual training and psychosocial counseling in adjustment to the loss of vision. JVIB 1998 July. Available at: http://www.afb.org/jvib_toc.asp

68Horowitz A, Leonard R, Reinhardt JP. Measuring psychosocial and functional outcomes of a group model of vision rehabilitation services for older adults. JVIB 2000 May:328-37.

69Ivanoff SD, Sjostrand J, Klepp KI, Lind L, Lindqvist B. Planning a health education programme for the elderly visually impaired person-a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil, 1996;18(10):515-22.

70Reinhardt JP, Horowitz A. The effect of rehabilitation on psychosocial adaptation in visually impaired elders. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Los Angeles, CA, November 1995.

71Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Brennan M, Cimarolli V. Depression, disability, and rehabilitation among vision impaired elders. Project overview. Available at: http://www.lighthouse.org/research_program.htm

72Massoff RW, Lidoff L (Eds.). Issues in Low Vision Rehabilitation. New York: AFB Press; 2001.

73Zambone AM, Cox Suarez S. Service delivery systems. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1153-65). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

74Raasch TW, Leat SJ, Kleinstein RN, Bullimore MA, Cutter GR. Evaluating the value of low-vision services. J Am Optom Assoc 1997;68:287-95.

75McCabe P, Nason F, Demers Turco P, Friedman D, Seddon JM. Evaluating the effectiveness of a vision rehabilitation intervention using an objective and subjective measure of functional performance. Opthalmic Epidemiol 2000;7(4):259-70.

76Leat SJ, Fryer A, Rumney NJ. Outcome of low vision aid provision: the effectiveness of a low vision clinic. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71(3):199-206.

77Russell W, Harper R, Reeves B, Waterman H, Henson D, McLeod D. Randomised controlled trial of an integrated versus an optometric low vision rehabilitation service for patients with age-related macular degeneration: study design and methodology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21(1):36-44.

78De l'Aune WR, Williams MD. Outcomes of the outpatient rehabilitation of the visually impaired. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Rehabilitation Research and Development. #C1894R.

79De l'Aune WR, Williams MD. Outcome assessment of the rehabilitation of the visually impaired. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Rehabilitation Research and Development. #C1776R.

80LaGrow SJ, Ponchillia PE, Ponchillia SV. The impact of service delivery systems on the individualization of rehabilitation programming for people who are visually impaired. RE:view 1998;30(2):55-63.

81Overbury O, Collin C. Vision rehabilitation services in the Americas. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 717-32). New York: Oxford University; 2000.

82Gandy MJ. Service delivery systems. In Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.).The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 1219-36). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

83D'Allura T, McInerney R, Horowitz A. An evaluation of low vision services. J Visual Impairment and Blindness 1995;89(6).

84D'Allura T. The consumer feedback survey: consumer perceptions of vision rehabilitation services. Arlene R. Gordon Research Institute of Lighthouse International. Poster presented at the 2000 AER International Conference. Denver, CO; 2000.

85Cavenaugh BS, Pierce SJ. Characteristics, services, and outcomes of rehabilitation consumers who are blind or visually impaired. NARIC Report No. H133B10003.

86Rogers P, Menchetti B, Lai S-C. Using existing databases to evaluate rehabilitation outcomes of older persons who are visually impaired. J Visual Impairment and Blindness 2000;94(5):338-42.

87Batavia AL. Independent living centers, medical rehabilitation centers, and managed care for people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(10):1357-60.

88Sutton JP, DeJong G. Managed care and people with disabilities: framing the issues. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1312-16.

89Pazell S. Implementing a visual rehabilitation program. Caring Magazine 1998;17(9):36-45

90Allan JM, Dignan KC. Assistive devices and technology: from research to user access. In: Silverstone B, Lang MA, Rosenthal BP, Faye EE (Eds.). The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Vision Rehabilitation (pp. 921-35). New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

91Banja JD, DeJong G. The rehabilitation marketplace: economics, values, and proposals for reform. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:233-40.

92Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Hannan MT, Milton RC, Wilson PW, Kiel DP. Impaired vision and hip fracture. The Framingham Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37(6):495-500.

93U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Life with low vision: A report on qualitative research among people with low vision and their caregivers; June 1997. Available at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/nehep/execsum.htm

94National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. Overview of NIDRR's Long Range Plan. Available at: http://www.ncddr.org/rpp/lrp_ov.html (accessed December 4, 2000).

95Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: Developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(S2):S10-S20.

96Wade DT. A framework for considering rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil 1998;12(5):363-68.

97Kramer AM, Rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient's perspective. Med Care 1997;35(6):JS48-JS57.

98DeJong G. Primary care for persons with disabilities: an overview of the problem. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76(Suppl.):S2-S8.

99Milner M. The potential of technological innovations for the disabled. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11(2):187-95.

100Evans RL, Connis RT, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 1995:40(12):1699-1706.

101Tinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, et al. Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence. JAMA 1995;273:1348-53.

102Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:495-500.

103Kane RL, Chen Q, Blewett LA, et al. Do rehabilitative nursing homes improve the outcomes of care? J Am Ger Soc 1996;44:545-54.

104Evans RL, Connis RT, Haselkorn JK. Evaluating rehabilitation medicine: effects on survival, function, and home care. Home Health Care Serv Q 1997;16(3):35-53.

105Mitchell R. Community-based rehabilitation: the generalized model. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21(10-11):522-28.

106Cooper M, Keating D. Implications of the emerging home systems technologies for rehabilitation. Med Eng Phys 1996;18(3):176-80.

107Beinecke R, Pfeifer R, Pfeiffer D, Soussou N. The evaluations of fee for service and managed care from the viewpoint of people with disabilities in the USA. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19(12):513-22.

Return to Contents

Current as of October 2002


Internet Citation:

Vision Rehabilitation: Care and Benefit Plan Models. Literature Review. October 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/vision/


 

Current as of October 2002
Internet Citation: Chapter 5: Vision Rehabilitation: Care and Benefit Plan Models: Literature Review. October 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/resources/vision/vision5.html