Following is a summary of a Discussion Paper that is part of a series of scientific papers funded by AHCPR to support the performance measurement efforts of the Foundation for Accountability (FACCT). The authors of these papers reviewed the science base and provided recommendations on measures. FACCT had identified the topics covered in this series—population-level measurement areas such as satisfaction and a number of clinical conditions—as first priorities. A print copy of the full text of this discussion paper is available free of charge from the AHCPR Publications Clearinghouse. Call toll free 800-358-9295 and order AHCPR Pub. No. 96-N023 (August 1996).
This Discussion Paper analyzes assessment tools for major depressive disorder (MDD) along the following dimensions:
The authors make recommendations concerning effective measures to use, measurement strategy, and risk adjustment. They then describe a number of quality measurement (accountability) systems. The authors conclude that measurement tools for MDD are readily available and can be used in conducting accountability systems.
This Discussion Paper was written by G. Richard Smith, M.D., Cindy L. Mosley, and Brenda M. Booth, Ph.D., of the Center for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Drs. Smith and Booth are also affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Field Program for Mental Health.)
Return to Measuring Healthcare Quality
Quality Assessment
AHRQ Home Page
Department of Health and Human
Services