Table 4.3. Number and Percentage Distribution of Intervention and Control Practices and Their Providers, Recruited To Participate in the SATIS-PHI/CRC Intervention

Health Care Systems for Tracking Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests

Attribute	Intervention Group				Intervention Dropouts				Control Group
	Practices		Providers		Practices		Providers		Practices		Providers
	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%
Total	15	100.0	64	100.0	5	100.0	17	100.0	5	100.0	19	100.0
Affiliation
LVHN clinic	2	13.3	11	17.2	0	0.0	0	0.0	1	20.0	5	26.3
LVPG	7	46.7	34.5	53.9	3	60.0	10	58.8	2	40.0	4	21.1
MATLV	2	13.3	4.5	7.0	2	40.0	7	41.2	1	20.0	4	21.1
Independent	4	26.7	14	21.9	0	0.0	0	0.0	1	20.0	6	31.6
Specialty
Family medicine	12	80.0	45	70.3	3	60.0	8	47.1	3	60.0	8	42.1
General internal medicine	3	20.0	19	29.7	2	40.0	9	52.9	2	40.0	11	57.9
Size
Small	8	53.3	19.5	30.5	3	60.0	7	41.2	2	40.0	4	21.1
Large	7	46.7	44.5	69.5	2	40.0	10	58.8	3	60.0	15	78.9
Location
Urban	3	20.0	12	18.8	1	20.0	4	23.5	1	20.0	5	26.3
Suburban	8	53.3	37.5	58.6	4	80.0	13	76.5	3	60.0	12	63.2
Rural	4	26.7	14.5	22.7	0	0.0	0	0.0	1	20.0	2	10.5

^a. Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.
^b. Providers can be physicians or nurse practitioners/advanced practice nurses and physician assistants who can see patients on their own during an office visit and who can maintain a panel of patients.

Return to Document

Current as of December 2010

Internet Citation: Table 4.3. Number and Percentage Distribution of Intervention and Control Practices and Their Providers, Recruited To Participate in the SATIS-PHI/CRC Intervention: Health Care Systems for Tracking Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests. December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/crcscreeningrpt/crcscreentab4-3.html