Page 1 of 1

Tracking and Improving Screening for Colorectal Cancer Intervention


IV. References

Babbie E. The practice of social research. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2004.

 

Campbell D and Stanley J. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1963.

 

Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley CJ. Influence of patient-provider communication on colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 2008;46(7):738-45.

 

Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(12):1123-29.

 

DeBourcy AC, Lichtenberger S, Felton S, et al. Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23(2):169-74.

 

Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008;34(4):228-43.

 

Geller BM. increasing patient/physician communications about colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care practices. Med Care 2008;46(9):S36-S43.

 

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM Framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89(9):1322-7.

 

Griffith KA, McGuire DB, Royak-Schaler R, et al. Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer 2008;113(2):276-85.

 

Harris DM, Borsky AE. Health care systems for tracking colorectal cancer screening tests: final report on the System Approach to Tracking and Increasing Screening for Public Health Improvement of Colorectal Cancer (SATIS-PHI/CRC) Intervention (Prepared by CNA Health ACTION Partnership under Contract No. HHSA290200600014). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. AHRQ Publication No. 11-0016-1-EF.

 

Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.

 

Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58(3):130-60. Available at: http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/58/3/130.

 

Levy BT, Nordin T, Sinift S, et al. Why hasn't this patient been screened for colon cancer? An Iowa research network study. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20(5):458-68.

 

Mathews AW. When all else fails: forcing workers into healthy habits. Wall Street Journal 2009;July 12.Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203577304574274102603258642.html.

 

Myers RE, Sifri R, Hyslop T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2007;110(9):2083-91.

 

Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D, et al. Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings. Prev Med 2001;33:249-60.

 

Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D, et al. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on followup in colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2004;38:375-81.

 

Natale-Pereira A. Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening practices in the Latino community: perspectives from community leaders. Cancer Control 2008 April;15(2):157-65.

 

Perceman E, Curran SR. A handbook for social science field research: essays and bibliographic sources on research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006.

 

Pinkowish MD. Promoting colorectal cancer screening: which interventions work? CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59(4):215-7.

 

Roth CP, Lim YW, Pevnick JM, et al. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record. Am J Med Qual 2009;24(5):385-94.

 

Sarfaty M, Myers RE. The effect of HEDIS measurement of colorectal cancer screening on insurance plans in Pennsylvania. Am J Manag Care 2008;14(5):277-82.

 

Sarfaty M, Wender R. How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice. Cancer 2007;57(6):354-66.

 

Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R, et al. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(4):364-71.

 

Snell JL, Buck EL. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 1996;25:702-7.

 

U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States cancer statistics: 1999-2006 incidence and mortality Web-based report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.

 

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(9):627-37.

 

Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1406-22.

 

West SL, Blake C, Liu Z, et al. Reflections on the use of electronic health record data for clinical research. Health Informatics J 2009;15(2):108-21.

 

Zajac IT, Whibley AH, Cole SR, e t al. Endorsement by the primary care practitioner consistently improves participation in screening for colorectal cancer: a longitudinal analysis. J Med Screen 2010;17(1):19-24.

 

Zapka J. Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Med Care 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S62-7.

Return to Contents

AHRQ Publication No. AHRQ 11-0016

Page last reviewed December 2010
Internet Citation: Tracking and Improving Screening for Colorectal Cancer Intervention. December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/crctoolkit/crctoolkit4.html