Figure 4-3: Examples of how measures fitting two different priority ar Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Figure 4-3. Examples of how measures fitting two different priority areas might ultimately be ranked (Text Description)Figure 4.3a. Priority Area: SafetyIn Figure 4.3a, there are three potential measures available:Safety Measure #1Safety Measure #2Safety Measure #3Arrows point from all three measures to the framework component "Safety" among a group of other framework components (Efficiency, Access, Patient/family-centeredness, Timeliness, and Effectiveness). Three arrows then point away from "Safety" to the following options:Safety Measure #1:Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)Yes, documents population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Select for reporting in NHQR/NHDR.Safety Measure #2:Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)No, does not document population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Ranks higher than other measures fitting the safety component, so report in NHQR/NHDR.Safety Measure #3:Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)No, does not document population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Ranks lower than other measures fitting the safety component, so do not report in NHQR/NHDR. Figure 4.3b. Priority Area: Population HealthIn Figure 4.3b, there are three potential measures available:Population Health Measure #1Population Health Measure #2Population Health Measure #3Arrows point from all three measures to framework component among a group (Efficiency, Access, Patient/family-centeredness, Timeliness, Safety, and Effectiveness). Population Health Measure #1's arrow points to Access. Population Health Measure #2's arrow points to Patient/family-centeredness. Population Health Measure #3's arrow points to Timeliness. Three arrows then point away from each of these components to the following options:Population Health Measure #1 (Access):Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)Yes, documents population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Select for reporting in NHQR/NHDR.Population Health Measure #2 (Patient-centeredness):Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)No, does not document population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Ranks higher than other measures fitting the patient/family-centeredness component, so report in NHQR/NHDR.Population Health Measure #3 (Timeliness):Yes, has the potential to increase value (Criterion D)No, does not document population inequities (Criterion E)Yes, documents geographic variation (Criterion F)Ranks lower than other measures fitting the timeliness component, so do not report in NHQR/NHDR.Return to Document Current as of December 2010 Internet Citation: Figure 4-3: Examples of how measures fitting two different priority ar: Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities . December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/iomqrdrreport/futureqrdrfig43txt.html