Appendix P. Multi-Channel Contact Center System Concept (continued)
Component Pricing Estimates and Assumptions
RFI Submittal
Based on the information gathered from the existing three call centers and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) HEALTH Grant Core Team a RFI document was created and submitted to six vendors for high-level pricing, specifications and concept design validation. The following is the list of the vendors contacted and those in bold, responded. Their responses can be found as appendixes to this document.
Vendor List
Alpine Access
Steve Rockwood
1536 Cole Blvd., Suite 350
Golden, CO 80401
303-279-0585
E-mail: srockwood@alpineaccess.com
Aspect
Larry Sells
Vice President, Government Sales
571-633-3316
E-mail: larry.sells@aspect.com
Avaya/Expanets
Jerry Tracy
Voice: 720-873-5890
Fax: 720-873-5962
E-mail: jerry.tracy@expanets.com
Ineto Services, Inc.
Web site: http://www.ineto.com/
Tim Moore
2600 Via Fortuna Dr., Suite 320
Austin, TX 78746
Office: 512-651-9792
Fax: 512-330-1694
E-mail: tmoore@ineto.com
Nortel
Kevin J. Gates
NextiraOne
Contact Center Account Executive
Cisco IP Telephony Specialist
Nortel Certified Account Specialist
303-267-3104 Voice
303-267-3150 Fax
303-598-3725 Cell
E-mail: KEVIN.GATES@NEXTIRAONE.COM
TeleTech
Web site: http://www.teletech.com
Chris Varrone
Vice President, Health Care Solutions
TeleTech Holdings, Inc.
303-397-8144
Cell: 303-808-8360
E-mail: Chris.Varrone@teletech.com
Avaya/Expanets, Nortel, and Aspect are call center equipment and integration vendors. Ineto Services, Inc. is an application services provider (ASP) that hosts outsource solutions for call center clients. Alpine Access and TeleTech are call center outsource providers that deliver turnkey solutions, including personnel for call centers. Alpine Access and TeleTech chose not to respond due to the size (FTE headcount numbers) of the proposed solution and the non-immediate need for resources. They quoted the challenges of keeping a "trained" workforce standing ready for what would be only temporary surges and required usage. There was no response, or indication to respond, from Aspect.
Pricing Estimates
Proposed Option 1
Development of Multi-channel Contact Center
Avaya/Expanets
| Item |
Hardware |
Software |
Professional Services |
Maintenance |
Other |
| IVR |
Included |
Included |
$145,000.00 |
|
Training included |
| AIC 6.0 |
|
$198,632.00 |
$264,362.00 |
1 yr |
|
| Remote Agent |
|
NP |
NP |
NP |
|
| Reporting |
|
Included |
Included |
|
|
| Totals |
$ - |
$198,632.00 |
$409,362.00 |
$ - |
$ - |
| Grand Total |
|
|
|
|
$607,994.00 |
AIC, Avaya® Interactive Center; IVR, interactive voice response; NP, not provided.
Nortel/NextiraOne
| Item |
Hardware |
Software |
Professional Services |
Maintenance |
Other |
| IVR |
NP |
NP |
NP |
NP |
|
| Genesys MM |
|
$101,452.50 |
$77,412.97 |
$20,424.32 |
|
| Genesys IC |
|
$117,685.00 |
$116,859.46 |
$24,622.22 |
|
| Remote Agent |
|
Included |
Included |
Included |
|
| Reporting |
|
Included |
Included |
Included |
|
| Totals |
$ - |
$219,137.50 |
$194,272.43 |
$45,046.54 |
$ - |
| Grand Total |
|
|
|
|
$458,456.47 |
IC, interaction center; IVR, interactive voice response; MM, multimedia; NP, not provided.
Proposed Option 2
Outsourcing of Multi-channel Contact Center Components
Ineto Services, Inc.
| Item |
Hardware |
Software |
Professional Services |
Maintenance |
Other |
| E-service 36-50 |
NA |
NA |
$30,000.00 |
$4,380.00 |
$87,600.00 |
| Usage |
NA |
NA |
|
$8,394.10 |
$167,882.09 |
| RightNow |
NA |
NA |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
| Web Application |
NA |
NA |
NP |
NP |
|
| E-reporting |
NA |
NA |
$500.00 |
|
$1,200.00 |
| Totals |
$ - |
$ - |
$31,500.00 |
$12,774.10 |
$256,682.09 |
| Grand Total |
|
|
|
|
$300,956.19 |
Note: Pricing (other than professional services) provided is recurring yearly cost
NA, not available; NP, not provided.
Proposed Option 3
Combination Development of Multi-channel Contact Center and Outsourcing
| Item |
Vendor |
Hardware |
Software |
Professional Services |
Other |
| IVR |
Avaya/Expanets |
Included |
Included |
$145,000.00 |
Training included |
| Web/E-mail |
Ineto |
|
|
$30,000.00 |
$175,921.04 |
| Remote Agent |
Avaya/Expanets |
NP |
NP |
NP |
|
| Reporting |
Ineto |
Included |
Included |
$500.00 |
$1,200.00 |
| Totals |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$175,500.00 |
$177,121.04 |
| Grand Total |
|
|
|
|
$352,621.04 |
Note: Pricing (other than professional services) provided is recurring yearly cost for Ineto Services, Inc.
IVR, interactive voice response; NP, not provided.
Key Performance Metrics
Best-in-Class Comparisons/Components
Appendix I displays 30 elements with associated best-in-class metrics. This same appendix appears as a summary for each call center we visited. Appendix II contains a glossary defining calculations and the importance of each of the best-in-class elements.
For comparison between call centers, we captured operational statistics from July 2002 to March 2003. This was the period most recently completed prior to the consultant visit. This will remain consistent unless otherwise noted within the specific call center analysis.
Many of the elements will contain an "NA" (not available) listed next to the element. Due to the abbreviated assessment portion of the engagement, some elements marked "NA" might currently be tracked by the organization, but were not provided or observed during the engagement. A further review of each "NA" is in order for the call centers.
Although some of the element targets may vary by industry and most surely by function within various call centers, they serve as a benchmark to review current operational statistics and strategies.
These 30 elements help to structure the following major categories1:
- Leadership Strategies for Success.
- Information Management and Analysis.
- Planning.
- Human Resource Management.
- Process Management.
- Business Results.
- Customer Focus and Satisfaction.
Chart 4 plots these seven categories based on a macro summary of the processes feeding the three call centers reviewed. This is a somewhat subjective assessment, as some call centers are more strongly aligned with a specific category of performance. This snapshot targets certain areas that RMPDC may choose for further review and investigation.
Chart 4. Plot of Seven Categories Based on Macro Summary of Processes Feeding the Three Call Centers Review
[D] Select for Text Description.
How to read Chart 4:
Wood Associates conducted a subjective assessment based on initial observations by our consultant during the four week information exchange process. We interviewed leadership, management, and observed HCP telephone interaction during various times of the day within the three call centers. Each of the 7 categories contains a mixture of the 30 element matrix as outlined in Appendix I. Assuming that best-in-class metrics for each category would be 100 percent, the top part of the bar shows the level of perceived defect by category—the greater the top bar, the greater the amount of defects. Strengths in the "overall" comparison would point to leadership, planning, and customer focus.
Introduction to Best-in-Class Components
Review of over 400 call centers across major verticals has revealed that successful operations can be identified across 30 consistent elements. These identified elements link strongly to higher customer satisfaction ratings for call centers. The discovery process, unfortunately at too high a level for this engagement, drove at uncovering current practices that may be in alignment with components of best-in-class metrics. For RMPDC as a whole current CMS reports were downloaded, and any performance feedback metrics or current planning documents were reviewed. These reports indicate areas of tracking for the call centers.
Each of the 30 elements represented in the "Best-in-Class Elements" matrix call for an in-depth analytical engagement from a performance management, business consulting, or technology development company. The next steps for the call centers consist of identifying those elements contained within the matrix that are key performance indicators supporting the vision of RMPDC. Those elements directly link with actionable items supporting each call center mission. The glossary within Appendix II will help at uncovering a basic calculation of the metric. What will be beneficial to each call center will be the discovery mission that will take place in realizing the performance behind the metric (the "result" of processes). Such a discovery mission usually uncovers many deficiencies in the supporting processes.
1Categories taken from: Putting Customers First; Serving the American Public: Best Practices in Telephone Services. Prepared by the National Performance Review, Federal Consortium, 1995.
Appendix I: Best-in-Class Categories
Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center (RMPDC)
| Category/Element |
Best-in-Class Metric |
RMPDC |
Gap |
Directions Yes/No/OS |
| Average speed of answer (ASA) |
15 seconds |
37 |
- |
Yes |
| Queue time |
15-20 seconds |
NA |
|
OS |
| Blockage |
< 1% |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Abandon calls |
3-4.5% |
10% |
- |
OS |
| Outbound calls |
variable |
37% |
|
OS |
| Transferred calls |
< 15% |
8% |
+ |
OS |
| After call |
< 65 seconds |
27 |
+ |
Improperly utilized |
| IVR call handling |
> 40% |
NA |
|
Yes |
| Call forecasting accuracy |
> 99% |
85% + |
|
Consistent call volume |
| Future call forecasting |
12 month min. |
As needed |
|
Client focused |
| Schedule adherence |
> 90% |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Occupancy |
85% |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Available time |
75% |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Attrition rate |
3-7% |
Very low |
+ |
Unsure |
| First call resolution |
85-95% |
NA |
|
Not measured |
| Repeat calls |
< 16% |
NA |
|
Not tracked |
| Customer satisfaction |
> 95% |
NA |
|
Infrequent |
| IS availability |
99.99% |
99% + |
+ |
Most systems |
| Performance feedback |
Monthly |
Yearly |
|
Need frequency |
| Outcome based pay for performance |
Yes |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Strategic plan |
Communicated |
Leadership |
- |
Expand to all levels |
| Vision/mission |
Displayed |
Displayed |
+ |
Exhibited |
| Cost per call (by minute) |
< $1.00 |
NA |
|
Not provided |
| Training time |
> 3 weeks |
10 weeks + |
- |
Needs streamlined |
| Recognition plans |
Yes |
NA |
|
Unsure |
| Customer knowledge data |
Yes |
NA |
|
Yes |
| Customer contact automation |
Yes |
NA |
|
Yes |
| Attendant prompting |
4 options |
< 4 |
+ |
Yes |
| IVR prompts |
4 layers |
NA |
|
Yes |
| "0" to live attendant |
Yes |
NA |
|
Yes |
IVR, interactive voice response; IS, information systems department; NA, not available, or not provided during WAC consultants' visit; OS, Not in business plan to address or out-of-scope for project(s).
Note: April 2003-June 2003
Appendix II: Best-in-Class Categories Calculations/Descriptions
| No. |
Metric Heading |
Calculation/Description |
Importance |
| 1 |
ASA |
Average length of time taken to live answer a call offered to a group |
First experience of a customer with a call center, the longer the wait the greater the frustration |
| 2 |
Queue time |
Length of time a call/caller is in queue waiting for a live answer |
"Maximum Delay" is sometimes used in tracking the longest amount of time a single caller is held in queue; may indicate problems with call routing strategies, or other interactive application problems |
| 3 |
Blockage |
Percent of calls receiving a forced busy, either from the network or within the PBX |
Higher percentages will contribute to customer loss, lower customer satisfaction, or lengthened handling once customer does get a connection |
| 4 |
Abandon calls |
Calls abandoned while in queue divided by total calls offered (answered plus abandoned) |
Lost opportunities to service customers-some "natural" abandons will occur; higher numbers indicate poor call routing, inefficient staffing levels, or inappropriate agent occupancy |
| 5 |
Outbound calls |
Calls made to internal extensions (other departments) and "out" to other parties/customers |
Inbound centers track the efficiency of processes by lowering the percentage of outbound calls to inbound calls; Inbound efficiency is directly linked to the availability of telephone representatives |
| 6 |
Transferred calls |
Calls handed internally/externally to another group, organization or supplier |
Indicates inefficiency of call routing, or inability of telephone representatives to handle call to resolution |
| 7 |
After call |
Time telephone representative spends "after (the) call" performing wrap-up, data entry, or further customer research |
Higher after call work times suggest incomplete process issues, inability to perform functions while on calls, or customer record systems not designed to "pace" with the call |
| 8 |
IVR call handling |
Number of completed calls within IVR (successful transactions) divided by total offered calls |
Higher successful IVR transactions relate to reduced cost per call (on total), customer satisfaction improvement, and reduced staffing expenses |
| 9 |
Call forecasting accuracy |
Forecast calls divided by actual calls |
One of three key elements in a staffing model; the higher the accuracy, the more accurate the staffing model resulting in efficient use of telephone personnel |
| 10 |
Future call forecasting |
Predictability of future call/work volumes for at least 12 mo |
Provides ability for staffing/budget preparation and allocation of resources |
| 11 |
Schedule adherence |
Availability of telephone representatives in alignment with scheduled requirements |
Staffing availability and accountability during forecast call volume periods |
| 12 |
Occupancy |
Utilization of call center telephone representatives (i.e., talk time plus after call divided by staff time [varies by site/call center software]) |
Key for inbound call centers, as economies of scale are utilized, insuring uniform usage of telephone representatives while avoiding "burnout" through over-utilization |
| 13 |
Available time |
Percent of staff time waiting for a call |
Available time needs to be balanced with occupancy, also coupled with occupancy insuring there is some balancing of load (calls time/talk time) |
| 14 |
Attrition rate |
Percent of total staff "turned over" in budget period (varies by call center site) |
Needed metric in understanding training needs/expense, as well as planning for high volume work periods |
| 15 |
First call resolution |
Calls determined by customer as "resolved" divided by total calls answered |
Used to barometer success of call center solution process, efficiency rating for customer satisfaction |
| 16 |
Repeat calls |
Calls determined by customer as a "repeat" to resolve same problem/concern/information divided by total calls answered |
Repeat calls are indication of incomplete processes, poor service delivery strategies, telephone representative training issues |
| 17 |
Customer Satisfaction |
"Overall" satisfaction rating delivered objectively to sampling agency/process |
Prime indicator of business health and key provider of business improvement opportunities |
| 20 |
Outcome based pay for performance |
Pay incentives aligned with performance objectives |
Key to getting desired operational results; need to be aligned with key drivers of the business and communicated simply and uniformly to build coach/player relationships |
| 21 |
Strategic plan |
Strategic road-map for success of organization |
Used during performance feedback, team development, and celebrations of success; this element uniformly communicated drives the business forward to attain objectives |
| 22 |
Vision/mission |
High level communication of business direction |
Uniformly displayed and communicated through the leadership ranks, a key "motivator" driving a uniform success strategy |
| 23 |
Cost per call (by minute) |
Total expenses associated with the call center (hardware, software, telecom, facilities, management, training, system support, etc.) divided by actual answered calls |
Indicator of success in call delivery and solution delivery processes; sometimes used as indicator of telephony vendor contracts and telephone representative system/job abuse |
| 24 |
Training and development |
Weeks of training provided (some use "informal" training within the calculation) to telephone representative annually |
Helps build qualified workforce, encourages telephone representatives to perform at higher levels, provides "relief" in front-line organizations |
| 25 |
Recognition plans |
Awards, acknowledgments for accomplishments of the telephone representatives |
Encourages higher levels of performance, improves personal accountability |
| 26 |
Customer knowledge data |
"Know-me" database, either prompted via call routing, ANI-matches, or IVR prompting |
Key to a "customer intimacy" model that suggests a proactive record keeping and accounting for all transactions with a customer |
| 27 |
Customer contact automation |
Automatic system capture of IVR prompting and call transaction data in "knowledge" database |
Reduces talk time and set-up by telephone representative allowing swift movement to trouble/contact resolution; greatly improves employee and customer satisfaction |
| 28 |
Attendant prompting |
Choices offered to a customer upon entering call center telephone switch |
Simple, few, understandable, and informative prompts allow customers quicker access to desired location for enhanced information and streamlined transactions |
| 29 |
IVR prompts |
Choices offered to a customer to complete transactions "interactively" with online systems |
Simple, few, understandable, and informative prompts allow customers quicker access to desired location for enhanced information and streamlined transactions |
| 30 |
"0" to live attendant |
Default to live telephone representative |
Streamlines movement for "lost" or frustrated customers to get live agent help |
ANI, automatic number identification; ASA, average speed of answer; IVR, interactive voice response; PBX, private branch exchange.
AHRQ Publication No. 05-0040
Current as of January 2005
Internet Citation:
Health Emergency Assistance Line and Triage Hub (HEALTH) Model. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0040, January 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/health/report.htm