Emergency Care/Hospitalization
Minority children with asthma often
use emergency departments (EDs) for
care.
Researchers analyzed 1996-2000 data
on 982 children with asthma and
found that black and Hispanic children
received asthma care in the ED more
often than white children, which is
consistent with findings from earlier
studies. The authors suggest that
additional ED visits occur because these
children often lack a usual source of
care and do not have a plan in place to
manage asthma at home when an
attack occurs. Thus, improving care
access and offering programs to teach
caregiver skills to manage asthma may
reduce ED visits.
Source: Kim, Kieckhefer,
Greek, et al., Prev Chronic Dis
6(1):Epub, 2009 (AHRQ grant
HS13110).
Rates of potentially preventable
hospitalizations are higher among
Hispanics than whites.
Hispanic adults from both poor and
wealthy communities are much more
likely than whites to be hospitalized for
health problems such as uncontrolled
diabetes and heart ailments. In contrast,
hospitalization rates are about the same
for Hispanics and whites with chronic
respiratory conditions such as asthma
and chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD). These findings are
derived from an analysis of 2006 data
from AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and
Utilization Project.
Source: Potentially
Preventable Hospitalizations Among
Hispanic Adults, 2006, HCUP
Statistical Brief 61; online at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs.jsp (Intramural).
Asian-Pacific Islanders are more likely
than whites to die in the hospital from
serious but treatable complications.
Asian-Pacific Islanders are 16 percent
more likely than whites to die from
serious but treatable complications in
U.S. hospitals, according to an analysis
of data from AHRQ's Healthcare Cost
and Utilization Project. Also, compared
with white patients, Asian-Pacific
Islanders having surgery are 42 percent
more likely to develop blood infection,
34 percent more likely to suffer kidney
failure, 14 percent more likely to need a
ventilator to assist breathing, and 34
percent more likely to suffer kidney
failure. Potential reasons for these
disparities include being cared for in
hospitals that provide lower quality of
care, having cultural or language issues
that interfere with doctor-patient
communication, or being sicker and
more vulnerable to complications than
other patients.
Source: Racial and Ethnic
Disparities in Hospital Patient Safety
Events, 2005, HCUP Statistical Brief
53; online at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb53.jsp (Intramural).
Black patients are more likely than
white patients to die after major
surgery.
According to this study, blacks are 23
to 61 percent more likely than white
patients to die following certain
cardiovascular or cancer surgeries, but
the hospital at which they are treated—not their race—accounts for most of
this difference in mortality rates.
Researchers used national Medicare
data to identify all patients undergoing
one of eight cardiovascular or cancer
procedures between 1994 and 1999.
Blacks had higher mortality rates (death
before discharge or within 30 days of
surgery) than whites for all operations
except for lung cancer. Hospitals that
treated 10 percent or more black
patients had higher mortality rates for
all eight procedures irrespective of the
patients' race. Black patients were more
likely to undergo surgery in very low
volume hospitals, a known risk factor
for increased mortality. However, some
hospitals that treated a large proportion
of black patients had higher mortality
rates independent of their procedure
volume, underscoring the need to improve quality of care at poor-performing
hospitals.
Source: Lucas, Stukel,
Morris, et al., Ann Surg 243(2):281-286, 2006 (AHRQ grant HS10141).
See also Fiscella, Franks, Meldrum, and
Barnett, Ann Surg 242(2):151-155,
2005 (AHRQ grant HS10910);
Groeneveld, Laufer, and Garber, Med
Care 43(4):320-329, 2005 (AHRQ
grant T32 HS00028).
Study finds disparities in use of strong
pain medications in hospital EDs.
Researchers analyzed treatments for
more than 150,000 pain-related visits
to U.S. hospitals between 1993 and
2005 and found that 23 percent of
blacks, 24 percent of Hispanics, and 28
percent of Asians received opioids for
pain, compared with 31 percent of
whites. Although the use of opioids to
treat pain increased overall from 23
percent in 1993 to 37 percent in 2005,
the differences in use among
racial/ethnic groups did not diminish.
In 2005, the last year of the survey, 40
percent of whites in pain received
opioids compared with 32 percent of all
others. Differences in prescribing for
whites, Hispanics, and blacks were
greater among those with the worst
pain; opioids were prescribed for 52
percent of whites, 42 percent of
Hispanics, and 39 percent of blacks
with severe pain.
Source: Pletcher, Kertesz,
Kohn, and Gonzales, JAMA 299(1):70-78, 2008 (AHRQ grant HS16238). See
also Chen, Kurz, Pasanen, et al., J Gen
Intern Med 20:593-598, 2005 (AHRQ
grant HS10861).
Hospital admissions for the sickest
children are similar for white, black,
and Hispanic children.
Researchers examined severity-adjusted
emergency department pediatric
admission rates in a 13-site sample of
8,952 children (3,112 white, 3,288
black, and 2,552 Hispanic) and found
that the sickest children (those in the
two highest illness severity quintiles) in
all three groups were admitted at
similar rates. They also found that
white children in the lowest illness
severity quintiles were admitted at 1.5
to 2 times the expected rate, suggesting
that white children were overadmitted
when not severely ill but not that black
and Hispanic children were being
denied essential admissions.
Source: Chamberlain, Joseph, Patel, et al.,
Pediatrics 119:1319-1324, 2007
(AHRQ grant HS10238).
Return to Contents
Health Care Access, Costs, and Insurance
Asian Americans enrolled in
traditional fee-for-service Medicare
receive fewer needed services than
white patients.
Researchers examined the association of
race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status
with the use of two Medicare-covered
cancer screening services (colorectal
cancer screening and mammography)
and three diabetes-related care services
(blood sugar measurement, eye exams,
and self-care instructions) among
elderly whites and Asian Americans.
The study focused on the metropolitan
statistical areas (MSAs) with the largest
number of elderly Asians in 2000,
including Los Angeles, New York City,
and Washington, DC. Asians were less
likely than whites to receive colorectal
cancer screening and mammography,
while Asian-white disparities in diabetes
care were less consistent and varied
according to geographic region.
Outside of the nine MSAs studied,
Asian-white differences were significant
across both cancer screening services
and all three diabetes services. Cancer is
the leading cause of death among
Asians, and diabetes-related conditions
rank fifth.
Source: Moy, Greenberg, and Borsky,
Health Aff 27(2):538-549, 2008
(AHRQ Publication No. 08-R064)*
(Intramural).
Minority children are half as likely as
white children to receive specialized
therapies.
This study found that 3.8 percent of
children aged 18 or younger obtain
specialized therapies from the health
care system, including physical,
occupational, and speech therapy and
home health care services. Children
most likely to use specialized therapies
tend to be male (59.7 percent), white
(80.6 percent), and have a chronic
condition (38.8 percent). Black
children, Hispanic children, and
children of other races were much less
likely than white children to receive
special therapies. These findings suggest
that either minority children are
underusing therapies or white children
are overusing them, according to the
researchers.
Source: Kuhlthau, Hill, Fluet, et al.,
Dev Neurorehabil 11(2):115-123, 2008
(AHRQ grant HS13757).
Hispanics with limited English
proficiency access health care less often.
According to an analysis of 2004 data
from AHRQ's Medical Expenditure
Panel Survey (MEPS), only about
49 percent of Hispanics who are not
comfortable speaking English have a
regular source of medical care (e.g.,
family doctor or community clinic),
compared with 63 percent of Hispanics
who are proficient in English. About 6
in 10 Hispanics with limited English
proficiency are uninsured, compared
with 3 in 10 who are proficient in
English. In addition, Hispanics with
limited English proficiency are less
likely than their more proficient
counterparts to visit a doctor or clinic,
go to an emergency room, have a prescription filled, or visit a dentist.
Source: Demographics and Health Care Access of
Limited-English-Proficient and English-Proficient Hispanics, MEPS Research
Findings 28; online at
http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb.
Also go to Health Insurance Status of Hispanic
Subpopulations in 2004: Estimates for the
U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Under Age 65, MEPS
Statistical Brief 143; online at
http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/Pub_ProdResults_Details.jsp?pt=Statistical%20Brief&opt=2&id=779.
(Intramural).
More blacks than whites have trouble
affording their prescription medicines.
Researchers recruited elderly black and
white patients from 48 primary care
practices in Alabama. Patients were
asked about their ability to pay for
prescriptions, their insurance coverage,
coexisting medical conditions, and
socioeconomic status. Blacks were twice
as likely as whites to not fill a
prescription (50 vs. 25 percent) and
were far more likely to report
inadequate income to meet basic needs
(61 vs. 17 percent). Of 399
participating patients, 53 percent had
an annual household income of less
than $15,000.
Source: Cobaugh, Angner, Kiefe,
et al., Am J Health Syst Pharm 65:2137-2143, 2008 (AHRQ grant HS10389).
Whites are more likely to seek distant
hospital care for less severe illness than
minorities.
This study analyzed the hospitalization
patterns of elderly residents of New
York to determine whether the relation
between distance traveled for care and
severity of illness was uniform across
racial/ethnic subgroups. The researchers
used hospital discharge data, which
they linked to other data files, and
found that minorities had to be more
severely ill than whites before they
sought distant hospital care. If costly
elective services were to be regionalized
to take advantage of high volume for
both cost and quality of care, extra
outreach efforts would be needed to
reduce disparities in appropriate care,
note the researchers.
Source: Basu and
Friedman, Health Econ 2006; online at
www.interscience.wiley.com (AHRQ
Publication No. 07-R029)*
(Intramural). See also Basu, J Health
Care Poor Underserved 16:391-405,
2005 (AHRQ Publication No. 05-R054)* (Intramural).
Immigrants use fewer preventive
services than U.S. natives.
Researchers compared use of preventive
care services by immigrants and native-born
residents and found that U.S.
natives had more medical and dental
visits, received more flu shots, and were
screened more often for high
cholesterol levels and cervical, breast,
and prostate cancers. Although
immigrants' use of preventive services
increases the longer they stay in the
United States, their use never matches
that of U.S. natives. Immigrants are
likely to be uninsured when they arrive
in the United States, but even after they
obtain continuous coverage, they still
are less likely than U.S. natives to use
preventive care.
Source: Pylypchuk and
Hudson, Health Econ; E-pub August
2008 (AHRQ Publication No. 09-R025)* (Intramural).
Minority children with special needs
are much less likely than similar white
children to receive vision care.
Nearly 6 percent of U.S. children with
special health care needs (CSHCN) do
not receive needed eyeglasses or vision
care, and black, Latino, and multiracial
CSHCN are two to three times as likely
as white children to have an unmet
need for vision care. Researchers
examined 2000-2002 survey data on a
sample of 14,070 CSHCN who needed eyeglasses or vision care in the
preceding year. Disparities in receipt of
vision care persisted even after
allowances were made for differences in
health status and other child and family
characteristics, such as insurance or
income.
Source: Heslin, Casey, Shaheen, et al.,
Arch Ophthalmol 124:895-902, 2006.
Hispanics enrolled in Medicare
managed care plans are less positive
than whites about their care
experiences.
More than half of Hispanics insured
through Medicare were enrolled in
managed care programs in 2002. A
2002 survey included 125,369
respondents enrolled in 181 Medicare
managed care programs nationally.
Responses from white enrollees were
compared with responses from
Hispanic enrollees; also, responses from
Hispanics who completed the survey in
English were compared with those who
completed the survey in Spanish.
English-speaking Hispanics viewed all
aspects of their care—except provider
communications—worse than whites
did. Spanish-speaking respondents
reported more negative care experiences
with timeliness of care, provider
communications, and office staff
helpfulness but were more satisfied with
getting needed care.
Source: Weech-Maldonado, Fongwa, Gutierrez, and
Hays, Health Serv Res 43(2):552-568,
2008 (AHRQ grant HS16980). See
also Basu, Friedman, and Burstin, J
Health Care Poor Underserved 17:101-115, 2006 (AHRQ Publication No. 06-R028)* (Intramural).
Community-based case managers
increase public insurance enrollment
of uninsured Latino children.
This study found that using bilingual
community-based case managers to
help poor Latino children enroll in
Medicaid or the Children's Health
Insurance Program (CHIP) reduced the
proportion of such children who were
uninsured and eliminated the disparity
in coverage between Latino children
and children of other races/ethnicities.
The researchers randomly assigned
uninsured Latino children aged 18 and
younger from two Boston-area
communities to either an intervention
group using trained case managers or a
control group that received traditional
Medicaid and CHIP outreach efforts.
They found that 96 percent of 139
uninsured children who received the
intervention enrolled in either Medicaid
or CHIP between May 2002 and
September 2003, compared with 57
percent of children in the control
group.
Source: Flores, Abreu, Chaisson, et al.,
Pediatrics 116(6):1433-1441, 2005
(AHRQ grant HS11305).
Researchers examine the effects of
various factors on children's health
insurance coverage.
Children of different racial and ethnic
groups vary substantially with respect to
health insurance coverage. These
researchers explored how much a given
characteristic contributes to coverage
differences, using a recently developed
statistical technique—decomposition
analysis. They found that observable
characteristics such as poverty, parent
educational level, family structure (for
black children), and immigration-related
factors (for Hispanic children)
account for 70 percent or more of the
coverage differences among white,
black, and Hispanic children. They
conclude that the lower coverage levels
among ethnic and racial minorities are
due to the fact that uninsurance is
concentrated among socioeconomically
disadvantaged children who happen to
be minorities.
Source: Pylypchuk and Selden, J
Health Econ 27(4):1109-1128, 2008
(AHRQ Publication No. 08-R068)*
(Intramural). See also Flores, Abreu,
Brown, and Tomany-Korman, Ambul
Pediatr 5(6):332-340, 2005 (AHRQ
grant HS11305); Shone, Dick, Klein,
et al., Pediatrics 115(6):697-705, 2005
(AHRQ grant HS10450); Simpson,
Owens, Zodet, et al., Ambul Pediatr 5(1):6-44, 2005 (AHRQ Publication
No. 05-R048)* (Intramural).
Reductions in care use under
Medicaid primary care case
management are more dramatic for
minority children.
Primary care case management
(PCCM) programs are designed to
increase patients' use of primary and
preventive care in doctor's offices, while
decreasing use of specialty and urgent
care. However, disruptions in care use
required by PCCM in Alabama and
Georgia had an unexpected negative
effect on children, especially minority
children, according to this study.
Implementation of PCCM in these two
States reduced primary care visits for
children, both through the gatekeeper
function and changes in provider
availability. PCCM was associated with
lower use of primary care for minority
children, but not white children, in
Georgia. PCCM reduced preventive
care for white and black children in
urban Alabama and for black children
in urban Georgia.
Source: Adams, Bronstein,
and Florence, Med Care Res Rev 63(1):58-87, 2006 (AHRQ grant
HS10435).
Changes in HMO membership alone
are unlikely to affect disparities in
receipt of primary care.
Researchers examined national data on
primary care office visits during the
years 1985, 1989-1992, and 1997-2000 and found that blacks were less
likely than whites to receive a Pap test, a rectal exam, smoking cessation advice,
or mental health advice, but they were
more likely to receive advice on diet
and weight and a followup
appointment. There was no significant
association between receipt of primary
care services and either HMO
membership or physician level of
HMO participation. There also was no
association between receipt of care and
patient race, Medicaid coverage,
percentage of Medicaid patients in the
practice, or duration of the visit.
Source: Fiscella and Franks, Am J Manag Care 11(6):397-402, 2005. See also Franks,
Fiscella, and Meldrum, J Gen Intern
Med 20:599-603, 2005 (AHRQ grant
HS10910).
American Indians and certain other
groups cannot easily access specialized
cancer care.
Previous studies have shown that
patients with a greater travel time for
care are more likely to be diagnosed
with advanced cancer, have decreased
use of breast-conserving therapy, and
have lower enrollment in clinical trials.
This study found that compared with
the overall U.S. population, American
Indians, nonurban residents, and
people living in the South travel further
for specialized cancer care. The median
travel time for all U.S. residents to a
specialized cancer center is 78 minutes;
Asians have the shortest travel time (28
minutes), and American Indians the
longest (155 minutes). Compared with
residents of the Northeast, travel time is
five times as long for people in the
South, three times as long for residents
of Western States, and more than twice
as long for those living in the Midwest.
Source: Onega, Duell, Shi, et al., Cancer 112(4):909-918, 2008 (AHRQ grant
T32 HS00070).
Access to primary care is very limited
for Latinos of Mexican origin living
in nonmetropolitan areas.
An analysis of 2002-2003 data from
AHRQ's Medical Expenditure Panel
Survey indicates that nonmetro
Mexicans face substantial barriers to
accessing timely health care, compared
with their metropolitan counterparts.
According to the study, Mexicans living
in nonmetro areas were 45 percent less
likely than metro whites and 49 percent
less likely than metro Mexicans to have
a usual source of care. Possible reasons
for this disparity include more
marginalization of Mexicans in smaller
communities and reduced English
ability among providers who also are
unable to provide interpreters.
Source: Berdahl,
Kirby, and Stone, Medical Care 45(7):647-654, 2007 (AHRQ
Publication No. 07-R059)*
(Intramural). See also Ku and Flores,
Health Aff 24(2):435-444, 2005
(AHRQ grant HS11305); McCabe,
Morgan, Curley, et al., Ethn Dis 15:300-304, 2005 (AHRQ grant
HS10637).
Greater access to physicians may
narrow mortality differences between
older blacks and whites.
Black people aged 65 and older in
Tennessee made more trips to the
emergency room than same-age whites
(2.6 vs. 2.1 visits, respectively) and had
more hospitalizations (1.34 vs. 1.25,
respectively), while whites averaged 7.5
more trips to the doctor during the 5
years of observation, according to this
study. The researchers used 1996-2002
Medicare data on 665,887 beneficiaries
in Tennessee to assess physician-diagnosed
conditions, health service
use, and mortality. Their findings held
even after accounting for racial
differences in diagnosed medical
conditions, socioeconomic status, and
use of other health care services. They
conclude that delaying treatment until
emergency services are required may
increase mortality rates for older blacks
and could account for the disparity in
black-white mortality rates.
Source: Sherkat,
Kilbourne, Cain, et al., Res Aging 29(3):207-224, 2007 (AHRQ grant
HS11640).
Low income minorities and whites
often self-treat severe toothache.
Researchers conducted focus group
sessions with 66 low-income Hispanic,
black, and white adults to examine how
they coped with toothache pain. All of
the participants had suffered toothache
in the past year and had used self-care
or care from a nondentist provider to
relieve their pain. These individuals
described their toothache pain as
intense, throbbing, miserable, or
unbearable and reported that it was bad
enough to affect their ability to perform
their regular activities, such as working,
housework, social activities, eating, and
sleeping. Some resorted to getting
arrested to get dental care, others pulled
their teeth out themselves or rinsed
with caustic substances in an attempt to
relieve the pain. Most reported the high
cost of dental care as the predominant
barrier to seeking care from a dentist.
Some also cited mistrust and fear, as
well as long waiting lists and lack of
sick leave as barriers.
Source: Cohen, Harris,
Bonito, et al., J Public Health Dent 67(1):28-35, 2007 (AHRQ Publication
No. 07-R072)* (Intramural).
Ethnic differences in attitudes and
beliefs about knee replacement surgery
may contribute to the disparities in its
use.
Researchers conducted focus groups
with 37 patients (two black groups, two
white groups, and two Hispanic
groups) who had knee osteoarthritis to examine differences in racial/ethnic
attitudes about total knee replacement
surgery. Differences were most obvious
in explanations of illness, perceived
changes in lifestyle, physician and
health care system trust, and attitudes
about paying for surgery. Blacks and
Hispanics described their knee pain as
being more debilitating than whites
did; whites were more likely to describe
ways in which they overcame those
limitations. Trust in their doctor was
pivotal in the surgery decision for
Hispanics; blacks were more willing to
pay for the surgery, even if it meant
borrowing money, to alleviate their
pain.
Source: Kroll, Richardson, Sharf, and
Suarez-Almazor, J Rheumatol 34:1069-1075, 2007 (AHRQ grant HS10876).
See also Kane, Wilt, Suarez-Almazor,
and Fu, Arthritis Rheum 57(4):562-567,
2007 (AHRQ contract 290-02-0009);
Byrne, Souchek, Richardson, and
Suarez-Almazor, J Clin Epidemiol 59:1078-1086, 2006 (AHRQ grant
HS10876); Bradley, Deutsch,
McKendree-Smith, and Alarcon, J
Rheumatol 32(6):1149-1152, 2005
(AHRQ grant HS10389); Souchek,
Byrne, Kelly, et al., Med Care 43(9):921-928, 2005 (AHRQ grant
HS10876); Suarez-Almazor, Souchek,
Kelly, et al., Arch Intern Med 165:1117-1124, 2005 (AHRQ grant HS10876).
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section
|