Developments of and Results from the AHRQ Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture
AHRQ's 2012 Annual Conference Slide Presentation
Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation.
Slide 1

Developments of and Results from the AHRQ Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture
2012 AHRQ Annual Conference
September 11, 2012
Joann Sorra, PhD, Westat
Image: A photograph shows a woman selecting a bottle of medicine from a shelf full of medications in a pharmacy.
Slide 2

Acknowledgements
Westat staff
- Martha Franklin.
- Laura Gray.
- Suzanne Streagle.
- Naomi Dyer.
- Theresa Famolaro.
- Scott Smith.
- Phuong Hoang.
AHRQ staff
- Diane Cousins.
- Deborah Perfetto.
- Chrstine Crofton.
- James Battles.
- Jeff Brady.
Technical Expert Panel Members
Elaine Swift, now at NORC
Slide 3

What is Patient Safety Culture?
"The way we do things around here"
Images: A double-headed arrow contains the text, "Exists at multiple levels: System, Organization, Department, Unit." An oval contains the text, "Beliefs, values & norms." A small rectangle contains the text "Shared by staff." A seven-pointed star contains the text, "What is Rewarded, Supported, Expected, Accepted."
Slide 4

Background
- Latest addition to SOPS family of surveys:
- Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
- Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
- Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
- Pharmacy SOPS to be released in October:
- Surveys and related material available at:
http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture/.
- Surveys and related material available at:
Slide 5

Patient Safety in Community Pharmacies
- More than 61,000 community pharmacies.
- One study estimated 4 errors per day in a pharmacy filling 250 prescriptions daily (2002).
- Survey purpose is to provide a tool for improving patient safety in community pharmacies.
(2011) National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS) 2011-2012 Chain Pharmacy Industry Profile
(2002) Flynn et al. Medication Dispensing Errors in Community Pharmacies: A Nationwide Study
Slide 6

Survey Development Process
- Reviewed literature & existing surveys.
- Interviewed experts and pharmacy staff.
- Identified key areas of patient safety culture.
- Developed survey items & pretested them.
- Obtained input from Technical Expert Panel (TEP).
- Piloted the survey in 55 pharmacies with 479 staff.
- Conducted psychometric analyses.
- Consulted with AHRQ and TEP to finalize survey.
- Developed Toolkit materials.
Slide 7

Technical Expert Panel
| Anne Burns | American Pharmacists Association |
| Carmen A. Catizone | Nat Assoc of Boards of Pharmacy |
| Michael R. Cohen & Donna Horn | Institute for Safe Medication Practices |
| Laura Cranston & David Nau | Pharmacy Quality Alliance |
| James T. DeVita | CVS |
| Susan Gentilli | Target |
| Karen Hudmon & Kyle Hultgren | Purdue University |
| Kevin N. Nicholson | National Assoc of Chain Drug Stores |
| Laura Pizzi | Jefferson University |
| Rebecca P. Snead | Nat Alliance of State Pharmacy Assocs |
| Jonathan Wolfe | University of Arkansas |
| AHRQ Staff |
Slide 8

Final Pharmacy SOPS
Patient Safety Culture Dimensions
36 items assess 11 dimensions of patient safety culture.
- Patient counseling.
- Communication openness.
- Overall perceptions of patient safety.
- Organizational learning—continuous improvement.
- Teamwork.
- Communication about prescriptions across shifts.
- Communication about mistakes.
- Response to mistakes.
- Staff training and skills.
- Physical space and environment.
- Staffing, work pressure & pace.
Patient safety "grade" (Excellent to Poor)
Slide 9

Pilot Study
- 55 pharmacies across 25 states.
- Paper surveys distributed within pharmacies.
- Overall response rate: 75% (479 out of 635).
- Average number of respondents per pharmacy:
- 9 respondents (range 5 to 20).
Slide 10

Pharmacy Characteristics
| Pharmacy Type | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Mass merchant/discount retailer | 19 | 35% |
| Supermarket | 18 | 33% |
| Independent | 8 | 15% |
| Integrated health system | 10 | 19% |
| Chain drugstore (local, regional, national) | 2 | 4% |
| Total | 55 | 100% |
Slide 11

Pharmacy Characteristics
| Number of locations | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 store | 5 | 9% |
2 to 9 | 7 | 12% |
10 to 24 | 0 | 0% |
25 to 99 | 10 | 19% |
| 100 or more | 33 | 60% |
| Total | 55 | 100% |
- 56% had 1,500 prescriptions per week or less.
- 33% had a drive-through window.
Slide 12

Staff Characteristics
| Staff Position | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacy Technician | 234 | 52% |
Pharmacist | 141 | 31% |
Clerk | 37 | 8% |
Student intern/extern | 25 | 6% |
| Other position | 13 | 3% |
| Total | 450 | 100% |
- 85% had at least 1 year experience in the pharmacy.
- 69% worked at least 32 hours per week.
Slide 13

Psychometric Analyses
- Item analysis:
- Dropped items with poor variability (1 item >91% positive).
- Examined % missing.
- Intraclass correlations (ICCs):
- All but one item had ICC ≥0.05 indicating significant between-pharmacy variance.
- Initial individual-level & multilevel confirmatory factor analyses on a priori composites:
- 5 of 48 items had low factor loadings (<0.40).
- 5 of 13 composites had at least one model fit statistic that did not meet criterion levels.
- Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha):
- 3 composites had low reliability (<0.70).
Slide 14

Psychometric Analyses
- Based on initial analyses, made recommendations to the TEP:
- Dropped Compliance with pharmacy procedures (3 items).
- Dropped "Documenting Mistakes" as a composite but retained it as 3 single-item measures.
- Dropped 13 other items from 8 composites.
- Pilot survey had 13 composites & 48 items;
final survey has 11 composites & 36 items.
Slide 15

Correlations Among Composites
- All composites are significantly correlated:
- Average: 0.46 (Range: 0.28 to 0.72).
- The strongest correlations:
- Organizational Learning—Continuous Improvement with Response to Mistakes (0.72) &
Communication About Mistakes (0.71).
- Organizational Learning—Continuous Improvement with Response to Mistakes (0.72) &
- The lowest correlations:
- Patient Counseling with Teamwork (0.28) &
Physical Space and Environment (0.28).
- Patient Counseling with Teamwork (0.28) &
Slide 16

Correlations With Overall Rating and Documenting Mistakes
- All composites significantly correlated with Overall Rating on Patient Safety:
- Average: 0.53 (Range: 0.38 to 0.74).
- The strongest correlation is with Overall Perceptions of Patient Safety (0.74).
- The lowest correlation is with Staffing, Work Pressure and Pace (0.38).
- All composites significantly correlated with the 3 Documenting Mistakes items:
- Except Physical space and environment & one documenting mistake item.
Slide 17

Pilot Results
Image: A bar graph shows positive response percentages for the following items:
Patient Counseling: 90%
Communication Openness: 87%
Overall Perceptions of Patient Safety: 84%
Organizational Learning—Continuous Improvement: 83%
Teamwork: 81%
Slide 18

Pilot Results (continued)
Image: A bar graph shows positive response percentages for the following items:
Communication about prescriptions across shifts: 81%
Communication about mistakes: 79%
Response to mistakes: 79%
Staff training and skills: 79%
Physical space & environment: 72%
Staffing, work pressure & pace: 41%
Slide 19

Overall Rating on Patient Safety
Image: A bar graph shows the following responses:
Excellent: 40%
Very good: 44%
Good: 11%
Fair: 5%
Poor: 0%
Slide 20

Frequency of Documenting Mistakes
Image: A bar graph shows the following responses:
| Reaches the patient & could cause harm but does not | Reaches the patient but has no potential to harm | Could have harmed patient, but is corrected BEFORE leaving the pharmacy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Always | 77% | 69% | 21% |
| Most of the time | 14% | 19% | 17% |
| Sometimes | 6% | 8% | 20% |
| Rarely | 2% | 3% | 24% |
| Never | 1% | 2% | 17% |
Slide 21

Results by Pharmacy Characteristics
- Mixed results by pharmacy "size":
- 1,500 or fewer RXs per week = Smaller pharmacy.
1,501 or more RXs per week = Larger pharmacy. - On some dimensions smaller pharmacies score higher; on others they score lower.
- 1,500 or fewer RXs per week = Smaller pharmacy.
- Smaller pharmacies had higher scores on:
- Physical space and environment:
- Smaller pharmacies 77% positive vs. 66% for larger.
- Response to mistakes:
- Smaller pharmacies 83% positive vs. 74% for larger.
- Physical space and environment:
Slide 22

Results by Pharmacy Characteristics
- Smaller pharmacies scored better on Frequency of Documenting Mistakes (lower % "never" documenting is better):
- Reach the patient but have no potential to harm
Smaller pharmacies 66% "Never documented" vs.
Larger pharmacies 73%. - Could have harmed patient, but is corrected:
Smaller pharmacies 17% "Never documented" vs.
Larger pharmacies 27%.
- Reach the patient but have no potential to harm
- Larger pharmacies had higher Overall Ratings on Patient Safety:
- Smaller pharmacies 81% "Excellent/Very Good" vs.
Larger pharmacies 89%.
- Smaller pharmacies 81% "Excellent/Very Good" vs.
Slide 23

Results by Staff Position
- Pharmacists scored higher than technicians on 10 of 11 composites.
- Largest differences on:
- Organizational learning-continuous improvement:
- Pharmacists 93% vs. technicians 81%.
- Communication about prescriptions across shifts:
- Pharmacists 87% vs. technicians 78%.
- Organizational learning-continuous improvement:
Slide 24

Results by Staff Position
- Pharmacists were more positive about Frequency of Documenting Mistakes (lower % "never" documenting is better):
- Reach the patient but have no potential to harm :
- Pharmacists 62% "Never documented" vs. Technicians 71%.
- Could have harmed patient, but is corrected:
- Pharmacists 9% "Never documented" vs. Technicians 28%.
- Pharmacists had higher Overall Ratings on Patient Safety:
- Pharmacists 88% "Excellent/Very Good" vs. Technicians 82%.
- Reach the patient but have no potential to harm :
Slide 25

Open-ended Comments
- 98 respondents submitted comments (~ 20%).
- Comments coded into themes.
- Most comments were about:
- Staffing.
- Physical space and environment.
- Work pressure and pace.
- Staff training and skills.
Slide 26

Comments
Staffing, work pressure & pace
- Often the pharmacy is short-staffed and the pace is very quick which I feel is conducive to mistakes.
- Pharmacy is placing too much emphasis on sales and customer service, not enough on support, staffing and safety.
Slide 27

Comments
Staffing, work pressure & pace
- No scheduled or unscheduled breaks for pharmacists over a 12 hour period.
- Telling multiple walk-in patients and drive thru customers that they can have their prescriptions in 15 minutes is not in the best interests of the patient or staff.
Slide 28

Comments
Physical space & environment
- Our pharmacy is way too small for the volume of prescriptions we fill.
- When they remodeled our pharmacy they should have made us bigger but we work in a small environment. We are always bumping into each other and tripping over things.
Slide 29

Comments
Staff training & skills
- I think our pharmacy technicians need to receive better training when they are first hired. Sometimes they aren't trained enough which then leads to mistakes.
- We need more time to train: place new employees in slower locations to learn setup and receive better training.
Slide 30

Comments
Patient counseling
- Pharmacists feel strongly about effective consultation with all patients as a tool to prevent errors.
- Patient education is a strength of this pharmacy. Customers are encouraged to ask questions and interact with our staff.
- Overall we do a great job concerning patient safety but there is not enough time for thorough patient counseling. Too understaffed most of the time.
Slide 31

AHRQ Support
- Toolkit materials similar to other SOPS surveys:
- Final Survey.
- User's Guide.
- Microsoft Excel®-based Data Entry and Analysis Tool.
- Pilot study results.
- Plans for a future Comparative Database.
Slide 32

Image: A yellow note with the words "Thank you!" written on it is shown.
joannsorra@westat.com
