National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedDevine EB, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Yanez ND
Effectiveness of a medical vs revascularization intervention for intermittent leg claudication based on patient-reported outcomes.
This study compared the effectiveness of a medical (walking program, smoking cessation counseling, and medications) vs revascularization (endovascular or surgical) intervention for intermittent claudication (IC) in the community, focusing on outcomes of greatest importance to patients. Among patients with IC, those in the revascularization cohort had significantly improved function (Walking Impairment Questionnaire), better health-related quality of life , and fewer symptoms at 12 months compared with those in the medical cohort.
AHRQ-funded; HS020025.
Citation: Devine EB, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Yanez ND .
Effectiveness of a medical vs revascularization intervention for intermittent leg claudication based on patient-reported outcomes.
JAMA Surg 2016 Oct 19;151(10):e162024. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2024.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Life, Treatments
Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
The authors discussed the efficacy and the risks of anti-TNF monotherapy versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive in patients with IBD. They concluded that the addition of an immunosuppressive to anti-TNF therapy improves treatment efficacy for infliximab in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Further, the use of combination therapy appears to add no significant incremental risk for serious infections above that seen with anti-TNF or immunosuppressive monotherapy in most patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS021747.
Citation: Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF .
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
Gut 2014 Dec;63(12):1843-53. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307126.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments
Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E
Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn's disease.
This study compared the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab, the two most commonly used anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). It found that both drugs were of similar effectiveness with respect to surgical rates, hospitalization rates, and the percentage of patients remaining on the drugs after 26 weeks.
AHRQ-funded; HS018517
Citation: Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E .
Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn's disease.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;12(5):811-817.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.010..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments