National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Elderly (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Implementation (1)
- (-) Medicare (4)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Payment (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Sex Factors (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedFraze TK, Beidler LB, Briggs ADM
Translating evidence into practice: ACOs' use of care plans for patients with complex health needs.
Researchers sought to understand how Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) use care plans to manage patients with complex clinical needs. After conducting semi-structured interviews with Medicare ACOs, they found that ACOs were using care plans for patients with complex needs, but their use of care plans did not always meet the best practices; ACOs were adapting use of care plans to better fit the needs of patients and providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Fraze TK, Beidler LB, Briggs ADM .
Translating evidence into practice: ACOs' use of care plans for patients with complex health needs.
J Gen Intern Med 2021 Jan;36(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06122-4..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Medicare, Health Insurance, Healthcare Delivery
Angraal S, Khera R, Wang Y
Sex and race differences in the utilization and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2014.
The authors sought to evaluate how the use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its outcomes have evolved in different sex and racial subgroups. Using Medicare data, they found that women and black patients had persistently higher CABG mortality than men and white patients, respectively, despite greater declines over the time period. The authors conclude that these findings indicate progress, but further progress is needed.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Angraal S, Khera R, Wang Y .
Sex and race differences in the utilization and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2014.
J Am Heart Assoc 2018 Jul 12;7(14). doi: 10.1161/jaha.118.009014..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Elderly, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Healthcare Utilization, Medicare, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Sex Factors
Eze-Ajoku E, Lavoie M, DeCamp M
Exploring the evidence base behind quality measures.
This study examined the strength of evidence behind quality measures used in Medicare’s 2016 Shared Savings Program. These measures apply to more than 430 accountable care organizations (ACOs). Differences existed in the grading systems used and the evidentiary strength. Based on average ACO performance, performance appeared to be lower in the moderate evidence category (overall average, 61 percent) compared to the high evidence category (overall average, 77 percent).
AHRQ-funded; HS023684.
Citation: Eze-Ajoku E, Lavoie M, DeCamp M .
Exploring the evidence base behind quality measures.
Am J Med Qual 2018 May/Jun;33(3):321-22. doi: 10.1177/1062860617721645.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Medicare, Payment, Provider Performance, Quality Measures
Cook EA, Schneider KM, Robinson J
Field methods in medical record abstraction: assessing the properties of comparative effectiveness estimates.
Comparative effectiveness studies using Medicare claims data are vulnerable to treatment selection biases and supplemental data from a sample of patients has been recommended for examining the magnitude of this bias. The investigators collected medical record data from a subsample of patients to assess the validity of assumptions and to aid in the interpretation of our estimates. In this paper, they sought to describe and document the process used to collect and validate this supplemental information.
AHRQ-funded; HS018381.
Citation: Cook EA, Schneider KM, Robinson J .
Field methods in medical record abstraction: assessing the properties of comparative effectiveness estimates.
BMC Health Serv Res 2014 Sep 15;14:391. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-391..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicare, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies