National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedChou R, Selph S, Blazina I
Screening for glaucoma in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This evidence report and systematic review updated the 2013 USPSTF final recommendation to assess benefits and harms of screening for primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in adults. After an extensive literature review, 83 studies were included (30 trials and 53 diagnostic accuracy studies). One randomized clinical trial (RCT) found screening of frail elderly persons associated with no difference in vision outcomes vs no screening but with significantly greater falls risk. There was limited direct evidence on glaucoma screening, with no association of benefits.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Chou R, Selph S, Blazina I .
Screening for glaucoma in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 May 24;327(20):1998-2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.6290..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Screening, Eye Disease and Health, Prevention, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Rushkin M
Ocular prophylaxis for gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This evidence report and systematic review was commissioned for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to update the evidence of using prophylactic ocular topic medication for all newborns to prevent gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum (GON) which can cause blindness if not treated immediately. Many articles were screened for inclusion, and of those included the recommendations remained an “A” grade recommendation, which is to apply the topical medication on all newborns due to an increase in syphilis prevalence.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Rushkin M .
Ocular prophylaxis for gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2019 Jan 29;321(4):404-06. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17847..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Eye Disease and Health, Guidelines, Newborns/Infants, Prevention, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Jonas DE, Amick HR, Wallace IF
Vision screening in children aged 6 months to 5 years: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The researchers reviewed the evidence on screening for and treatment of amblyopia, its risk factors, and refractive error in children aged 6 months to 5 years to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. They concluded that studies directly evaluating the effectiveness of screening were limited and do not establish whether vision screening in preschool children is better than no screening.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200015I.
Citation: Jonas DE, Amick HR, Wallace IF .
Vision screening in children aged 6 months to 5 years: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2017 Sep 5;318(9):845-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9900.
.
.
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Eye Disease and Health, Children/Adolescents, Screening, Newborns/Infants
Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C
Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This update of a 2009 systematic review on screening for impaired visual acuity among older adults found that new evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of visual acuity screening tests was limited and consistent with previous findings that screening questions or a visual acuity test was associated with suboptimal accuracy. Direct evidence found no significant difference between vision screening in older adults in primary care settings vs no screening for improving visual acuity or other clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C .
Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2016 Mar 1;315(9):915-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0783.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Evidence-Based Practice, Eye Disease and Health, Primary Care, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)