National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedZeitler EP, Al-Khatib SM, Friedman DJ
Predicting appropriate shocks in patients with heart failure: patient level meta-analysis from SCD-HeFT and MADIT II.
The study authors sought to identify characteristics predictive of appropriate shocks in patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In this meta-analysis of patient level data from Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II and Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, no beta-blocker therapy, and single chamber ICD (vs. dual chamber) were significant predictors of appropriate shocks.
AHRQ-funded; HS018505.
Citation: Zeitler EP, Al-Khatib SM, Friedman DJ .
Predicting appropriate shocks in patients with heart failure: patient level meta-analysis from SCD-HeFT and MADIT II.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017 Nov;28(11):1345-51. doi: 10.1111/jce.13307.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Heart Disease and Health, Medical Devices, Medical Devices, Risk
Spangler EL, Goodney PP, Schanzer A
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients.
The purpose of this study was to compare risk-stratified outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Included in the study group were 11,336 patients who underwent isolated primary CEA and 544 who underwent primary CAS. The researchers found that asymptomatic normal- and high-risk patients do equally well after CEA or CAS. However, normal- and high-risk symptomatic patients have substantially worse outcomes with CAS compared with CEA.
AHRQ-funded; HS021581.
Citation: Spangler EL, Goodney PP, Schanzer A .
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients.
J Vasc Surg 2014 Nov;60(5):1227-31, 31.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.044..
Keywords: Outcomes, Comparative Effectiveness, Risk, Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health