National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (5)
- Decision Making (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Medication (1)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (5)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedBlecker S, Austrian JS, Horwitz LI
Interrupting providers with clinical decision support to improve care for heart failure.
The goal of this study was to develop a clinical decision support (CDS) system to recommend an angiotenson converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor during hospitalization so it could be promoted for continuation at discharge. Patients who were hospitalized with reduced ejection fraction were pseudo-randomized to deliver interruptive or non-interruptive CDS alerts to providers based on the patients’ even or odd medical record number. The utilization rate was higher for interruptive alert versus non-interruptive alert hospitalizations for a sample of 958. This resulted in improved quality of care for heart failure patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS023683.
Citation: Blecker S, Austrian JS, Horwitz LI .
Interrupting providers with clinical decision support to improve care for heart failure.
Int J Med Inform 2019 Nov;131:103956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103956..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Bowen ME, Bhat D, Fish J
Improving performance on preventive health quality measures using clinical decision support to capture care done elsewhere and patient exceptions.
This before-after study was conducted to examine the ability of clinical decision support (CDS) to improve performance on preventive quality measures, capture clinician-reported services completed elsewhere, and patient/medical exceptions and to describe their impact on quality measurement.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Bowen ME, Bhat D, Fish J .
Improving performance on preventive health quality measures using clinical decision support to capture care done elsewhere and patient exceptions.
Am J Med Qual 2018 May/Jun;33(3):237-45. doi: 10.1177/1062860617732830..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Quality Measures
Grout RW, Cheng ER, Carroll AE
A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.
This study examined user acceptance patterns over six years of a continuous computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) integration and updated a long-term, repeated follow-up of user acceptability of a CDSS. It found that favorable opinions of the CDSS were more likely in frequent users, physicians and advanced practitioners, and full-time workers.
AHRQ-funded; HS017939; HS018453; HS020640.
Citation: Grout RW, Cheng ER, Carroll AE .
A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.
Int J Med Inform 2018 Apr;112:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.011.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Provider: Health Personnel, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement
Aldina S, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Hannenberg AA
Factors associated with the use of cognitive aids in operating room crises: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers.
This study examined organizational context and implementation process factors influencing the use of cognitive aids for OR crises. It found that small facility size was associated with a fourfold increase in the odds of a facility reporting more successful implementation. Completing more implementation steps was also significantly associated with more successful implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS024235.
Citation: Aldina S, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Hannenberg AA .
Factors associated with the use of cognitive aids in operating room crises: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers.
Implement Sci 2018 Mar 26;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0739-4.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Hendrix KS, Downs SM, Carroll AE
Pediatricians' responses to printed clinical reminders: does highlighting prompts improve responsiveness?
The authors tested whether selectively highlighting clinical decision support prompts in yellow would improve physicians' responsiveness. They found that highlighting reminder prompts did not increase physicians' responsiveness. They suggested possible explanations and offer alternative strategies to increasing physician responsiveness to prompts.
AHRQ-funded; HS020640; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Hendrix KS, Downs SM, Carroll AE .
Pediatricians' responses to printed clinical reminders: does highlighting prompts improve responsiveness?
Acad Pediatr 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.009.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Children/Adolescents, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Quality Improvement