National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Antibiotics (1)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (1)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Hospitals (3)
- Medication (1)
- Mortality (2)
- Outcomes (4)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (8)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (8)
- (-) Sepsis (8)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedBolte TB, Swanson MB, Kaldjian AM
Hospitals that report severe sepsis and septic shock bundle compliance have more structured sepsis performance improvement.
This study linked survey data on quality improvement (QI) practices from Iowa hospitals to severe sepsis/septic shock (SEP-1) performance data and mortality. All Iowa hospitals (100%) completed the survey. SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% versus 38%) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans. Increased SEP-1 scores were not associated with sepsis QI practices. A sepsis registry was associated with decreased odds of being in the bottom quartile of sepsis mortality, and presence of a sepsis committee was associated with lower hospital-specific mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS025753.
Citation: Bolte TB, Swanson MB, Kaldjian AM .
Hospitals that report severe sepsis and septic shock bundle compliance have more structured sepsis performance improvement.
J Patient Saf 2022 Dec 1;18(8):e1231-e36. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001062..
Keywords: Sepsis, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care
Paul R, Niedner M, Brilli R
Metric development for the multicenter Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) Collaborative.
A 56 US hospital collaborative, Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO), has developed variables, metrics and a data analysis plan to track quality improvement (QI)-based patient outcomes over time. Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes expands on previous pediatric sepsis QI efforts by improving electronic data capture and uniformity across sites. This paper describes the metric development for the multicenter IPSO Collaborative.
AHRQ-funded; HS025696.
Citation: Paul R, Niedner M, Brilli R .
Metric development for the multicenter Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) Collaborative.
Pediatrics 2021 May;147(5):e2020017889. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-017889..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Sepsis, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Larsen GY, Brilli R, Macias CG
Development of a quality improvement learning collaborative to improve pediatric sepsis outcomes.
Researchers developed a multicenter quality improvement learning collaborative of US children's hospitals. They created a key driver diagram (KDD) with the aim of reducing both the sepsis-attributable mortality and the incidence of hospital-onset sepsis in children. The KDD primary drivers focused on improving the following: treatment of infection; recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis; de-escalation of unnecessary care; engagement of patients and families; and methods to optimize performance. The Children's Hospital Association Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes collaborative aims to improve sepsis outcomes through collaborative learning and reliable implementation of evidence-based interventions.
AHRQ-funded; HS025696.
Citation: Larsen GY, Brilli R, Macias CG .
Development of a quality improvement learning collaborative to improve pediatric sepsis outcomes.
Pediatrics 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1434..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Sepsis, Outcomes, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Education: Continuing Medical Education
Scott HF, Brilli RJ, Paul R
Evaluating pediatric sepsis definitions designed for electronic health record extraction and multicenter quality improvement.
The purpose of this study was to describe the Children's Hospital Association's Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis definitions and to evaluate the definition using a published framework. The investigators concluded that the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated feasibility for large-scale data abstraction. When operationalized, these definitions enabled multicenter identification and data aggregation, indicating practical utility for quality improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS025696.
Citation: Scott HF, Brilli RJ, Paul R .
Evaluating pediatric sepsis definitions designed for electronic health record extraction and multicenter quality improvement.
Crit Care Med 2020 Oct;48(10):e916-e26. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004505..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Sepsis, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Shappell CN, Klompas M, Rhee C
Surveillance strategies for tracking sepsis incidence and outcomes.
Sepsis is a leading cause of death and the target of intense efforts to improve recognition, management and outcomes. Accurate sepsis surveillance is essential to properly interpreting the impact of quality improvement initiatives, making meaningful comparisons across hospitals and geographic regions, and guiding future research and resource investments. In this review, the investigators discuss the advantages and limitations of different sepsis surveillance strategies and consider future directions.
AHRQ-funded; HS025008.
Citation: Shappell CN, Klompas M, Rhee C .
Surveillance strategies for tracking sepsis incidence and outcomes.
J Infect Dis 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S74-s83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa102..
Keywords: Sepsis, Outcomes, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Barbash IJ, Kahn JM
Sepsis quality in safety-net hospitals: an analysis of Medicare's SEP-1 performance measure.
Researchers studied the relationship between hospital safety-net status and performance on Medicare's SEP-1 quality measure. Data from 2827 hospitals were analyzed. They found that existing sepsis policies may harm safety-net hospitals and widen health disparities. They suggest that strategies to promote collaboration among hospitals may be an avenue for sepsis performance improvement in these hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS025455.
Citation: Barbash IJ, Kahn JM .
Sepsis quality in safety-net hospitals: an analysis of Medicare's SEP-1 performance measure.
J Crit Care 2019 Dec;54:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.009.
.
.
Keywords: Sepsis, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement
Weinberger J, Rhee C, Klompas M
A critical analysis of the literature on time-to-antibiotics in suspected sepsis.
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends immediate antibiotics for all patients with suspected sepsis and septic shock, ideally within 1 hour of recognition. An accurate understanding of the precise relationship between time-to-antibiotics and mortality for patients with possible sepsis is therefore critical. In this study, the investigators elaborate on potential sources of bias and try to distill a better understanding of what the true relationship between time-to-antibiotics and mortality may be for patients with suspected sepsis or septic shock.
AHRQ-funded; HS025008.
Citation: Weinberger J, Rhee C, Klompas M .
A critical analysis of the literature on time-to-antibiotics in suspected sepsis.
J Infect Dis 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S110-s18. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa146..
Keywords: Sepsis, Antibiotics, Medication, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Mortality
Austrian JS, Jamin CT, Doty GR
Impact of an emergency department electronic sepsis surveillance system on patient mortality and length of stay.
The goal of this study was to determine if an electronic health record (EHR) based sepsis alert system could improve quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis. A patient-level, interrupted time series study of emergency department patients with severe sepsis or septic shock was conducted, with an intervention introduced at the approximate mid-point--a system of interruptive sepsis alerts triggered by abnormal vital signs or laboratory results. Mean length of stay for patients with sepsis decreased significantly following the introduction of the alert, but the alert system had no effect on mortality or other clinical or process measures. The researchers conclude that a more sophisticated algorithm for sepsis identification is needed to improve outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS023683.
Citation: Austrian JS, Jamin CT, Doty GR .
Impact of an emergency department electronic sepsis surveillance system on patient mortality and length of stay.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018 May;25(5):523-29. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx072..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Mortality, Outcomes, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Sepsis