National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedGephart SM, Newnam K, Weiss A
Feasibility and acceptability of a Neonatal Project ECHO (NeoECHO) as a dissemination and implementation strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis.
Investigators examined the feasibility and acceptability of the care tools bundle NeoECHO to disseminate NEC-Zero education and describe the intentions of internal facilitators and clinicians to initiate quality improvement changes. They found that NeoECHO was an acceptable and feasible way to engage under-resourced NICUs and share NEC-Zero evidence and tools. They recommended more research to examine the impact of NeoECHO on care processes and patient outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022908.
Citation: Gephart SM, Newnam K, Weiss A .
Feasibility and acceptability of a Neonatal Project ECHO (NeoECHO) as a dissemination and implementation strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021 Dec;18(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12529..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Implementation
Groetzinger LM, Rivosecchi RM, McVerry BJ
A quality improvement evaluation of a primary as-needed light sedation protocol in mechanically ventilated adults.
This study assessed outcomes of using a light-sedation protocol as needed compared to the more usual continuous infusion sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in medical intensive care units (ICUs). This retrospective review compared patients who received the as needed sedation protocol to similar patients treated initially with continuous infusion sedation at a 32-bed medical ICU in a large academic center. Over a 2-year period, 254 total mechanically ventilated patients were evaluated. Of the evaluable patients, 114 received the prioritizing as-needed sedation protocol, and 140 received the continuous infusion approach. In the as-needed group, 42% of patients never received continuous infusion sedation. The group also received significantly less opioid, propofol, and benzodiazepine; and experienced less delirium, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and shorter ICU length of stay compared to the continuous infusion sedation group.
AHRQ-funded; HS025455.
Citation: Groetzinger LM, Rivosecchi RM, McVerry BJ .
A quality improvement evaluation of a primary as-needed light sedation protocol in mechanically ventilated adults.
Crit Care Explor 2020 Dec;2(12):e0264. doi: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000264..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Critical Care, Implementation
Anandaiah AM, Stevens JP, Sullivan AM
Implementation of a bundled consent process in the ICU: a single-center experience.
This study examined perceptions of internal medicine residents in the ICU of an urban academic medical center about using a bundled consent process with patients and their families. The bundled consent provides consent for all commonly performed procedures on a single form. It has been advocated as an efficient method, but there is little published literature about its use. Out of 164 internal residents surveyed, 102 completed the survey. The majority (78%) felt it scared or stressed families, and only 26% felt confident that they would obtain valid informed consent.
AHRQ-funded; HS024288.
Citation: Anandaiah AM, Stevens JP, Sullivan AM .
Implementation of a bundled consent process in the ICU: a single-center experience.
Crit Care Med 2019 Oct;47(10):1332-36. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003905..
Keywords: Implementation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Hospitals, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication