National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Communication (1)
- Decision Making (5)
- Diabetes (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- (-) Guidelines (8)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Medication (1)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (8)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality of Care (4)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedHoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care
Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care
Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
This study sought to develop and reach consensus on reporting guidelines to improve the quality of publications evaluating patient decision aids (PDAs). The study concluded that the SUNDAE (Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations) Checklist will help ensure that reports of PDA evaluation studies are understandable, transparent and of high quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS .
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):380-88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986..
Keywords: Communication, Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Health Literacy, Patient-Centered Healthcare
McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explored how patient characteristics associated with a high risk-to-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affected decision making by primary care clinicians. The investigators found that primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warranted higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE .
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):192-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141..
Keywords: Diabetes, Elderly, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Decision Making, Medication, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Shaughnessy AF, Vaswani A, Andrews BK
Developing a clinician friendly tool to identify useful clinical practice guidelines: G-TRUST.
The goal of this project was to develop a simple, easy-to-use checklist for clinicians to use to identify trustworthy, relevant, and useful practice guidelines, the Guideline Trustworthiness, Relevance, and Utility Scoring Tool (G-TRUST). They concluded that the 8-item G-TRUST developed by the project is potentially helpful as a tool for clinicians to identify useful guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS022940.
Citation: Shaughnessy AF, Vaswani A, Andrews BK .
Developing a clinician friendly tool to identify useful clinical practice guidelines: G-TRUST.
Ann Fam Med 2017 Sep;15(5):413-18. doi: 10.1370/afm.2119.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Hamilton JG, Lillie SE, Alden DL
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.
This position paper, informed by conference sessions featuring diverse stakeholders held at the 2015 Society of Behavioral Medicine and Society for Medical Decision Making annual meetings, describes key concepts that influence the decision making process itself and that may change what it means to make a good decision: interpersonal factors, structural constraints, affective influences, and values clarification methods.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Hamilton JG, Lillie SE, Alden DL .
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.
J Behav Med 2017 Feb;40(1):52-68. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9785-z.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Nuckols T, Conlon C, Robbins M
Quality of care for work-associated carpal tunnel syndrome.
This study evaluated the quality of care provided to individuals with workers' compensation claims related to carpal tunnel syndrome and identified patient characteristics associated with receiving better care. Overall, 81.6 percent of care adhered to recommended standards. Patients with classic/probable Katz diagrams, positive electrodiagnostic tests, and higher incomes received better care. However, age, sex, and race/ethnicity were not associated with quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS018982.
Citation: Nuckols T, Conlon C, Robbins M .
Quality of care for work-associated carpal tunnel syndrome.
J Occup Environ Med 2017 Jan;59(1):47-53. doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000916.
.
.
Keywords: Guidelines, Quality of Care, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Bierman AS, Tinetti ME
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS
Precision medicine to precision care: managing multimorbidity.
Multimorbidity is the most common condition managed in practice. The authors argue that health-care delivery must be transformed to provide precision care to people with multimorbidity. Accomplishing this transition will require a change in practice, research, and policy from disease-specific to patient-centered models of care delivery.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Bierman AS, Tinetti ME .
Precision medicine to precision care: managing multimorbidity.
Lancet 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2721-23. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32232-2.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Chronic Conditions, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care