National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Cancer (7)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (1)
- (-) Decision Making (7)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- (-) Genetics (7)
- Healthcare Costs (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Screening (2)
- Surgery (1)
- Treatments (1)
- Women (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 7 of 7 Research Studies DisplayedGore Moses R, Nieters A, Valentine rKD
Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.
This study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, reliability, and validity of the four-item Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process Scale for use in for hereditary cancer genetic testing decision-making. Participants were patients from a large hereditary cancer genetics practice who responded to an online survey following pre-test genetic counseling; the survey included the SDM Process Scale and the SURE scale. The SDM Process Scale showed feasibility, acceptability, and retest reliability, but not convergent validity with decisional conflict. The authors concluded that their findings provided evidence for use of this scale to measure patient perceptions of SDM in pre-test counseling.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Gore Moses R, Nieters A, Valentine rKD .
Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.
J Genet Couns 2023 Oct; 32(5):957-64. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1704..
Keywords: Decision Making, Cancer, Genetics
Kunst NR, Alarid-Escudero F, Paltiel AD
A value of information analysis of research on the 21-gene assay for breast cancer management.
The authors aimed to quantify the value of conducting further research to reduce decision uncertainty in the use of the 21-gene assay Oncotype DX (21-GA). They found that current evidence strongly supports the use of the 21-GA in intermediate- and high-risk women and recommended that further research focus on low-risk women.
AHRQ-funded; HS023900.
Citation: Kunst NR, Alarid-Escudero F, Paltiel AD .
A value of information analysis of research on the 21-gene assay for breast cancer management.
Value Health 2019 Oct;22(10):1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.004..
Keywords: Genetics, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Decision Making, Research Methodologies
Matsen CB, Lyons S, Goodman MS
Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.
The purpose of this study was to better understand decision role preferences in women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age for return of results of genome sequencing in research and clinical settings. The investigators found that most women in their study preferred to share in decision making and that participants had somewhat different role preferences for clinical and research contexts, with greater preference for active roles in the research context.
AHRQ-funded; HS024784.
Citation: Matsen CB, Lyons S, Goodman MS .
Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.
Patient Educ Couns 2019 Jan;102(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.004..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Decision Making, Genetics, Women
Balentine CJ, Vanness DJ, Schneider DF
Cost-effectiveness of lobectomy versus genetic testing (Afirma(R)) for indeterminate thyroid nodules: considering the costs of surveillance.
This study evaluated whether diagnostic thyroidectomy for indeterminate thyroid nodules would be more cost-effective than genetic testing after including the costs of long-term surveillance. Its base case estimate suggests that diagnostic lobectomy dominates genetic testing as a strategy for ruling out malignancy of indeterminate thyroid nodules.
AHRQ-funded; HS023009.
Citation: Balentine CJ, Vanness DJ, Schneider DF .
Cost-effectiveness of lobectomy versus genetic testing (Afirma(R)) for indeterminate thyroid nodules: considering the costs of surveillance.
Surgery 2018 Jan;163(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.004.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Genetics, Healthcare Costs, Screening, Surgery
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Potosky AL, O'Neill SC, Isaacs C
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.
The authors evaluated the relation between gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy by women treated in a general oncology practice. They found that adjuvant chemotherapy use after GEP testing is generally consistent with the recommended test interpretation for women with a high or low predicted risk of recurrence. Chemotherapy use in the intermediate-risk group increased with Recurrence Score values, and evidence from ongoing randomized trials may help to clarify whether this finding reflects optimal interpretation of GEP test results.
AHRQ-funded; HS022915.
Citation: Potosky AL, O'Neill SC, Isaacs C .
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.
Cancer 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29621.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Treatments, Decision Making, Genetics, Practice Patterns, Women
Gallego CJ, Shirts BH, Bennette CS
Next-generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
The researchers evaluated the cost effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis (CRCP) syndromes in patients referred to cancer genetics clinics. They concluded that the use of an NGS panel that includes genes associated with highly penetrant CRCP syndromes in addition to Lynch syndrome genes as a first-line test is likely to provide meaningful clinical benefits in a cost-effective manner.
AHRQ-funded; HS021686.
Citation: Gallego CJ, Shirts BH, Bennette CS .
Next-generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
J Clin Oncol 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2084-91. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.3665..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Genetics, Healthcare Costs, Screening